Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Caucasus powder keg

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Caucasus powder keg

    Azerbaijan: Caucasus powder keg

    The Halifax Chronicle Herald, Nova Scotia (Canada)
    July 30 2006

    Strategic country on the East-West fault line sets its sights on
    better ties with the West as it prepares for new oil wealth and fresh
    conflicts with neighbours

    By SCOTT TAYLOR Special to The NovaScotian

    'WE WERE engaged in heavy fighting with Armenian troops near my home
    village of Lachin when a mortar shell hit my friend's trench. When I
    got to him I saw that his belly had been ripped open by the shrapnel
    and he was screaming in mortal pain. He died in my arms as I tried
    to stuff his intestines back inside him."

    At this point the storyteller suddenly goes silent as he relives the
    horror of that experience, which occurred nearly 14 years ago. Now
    37, Gurhan Iliyev was just a 23-year-old sergeant in the Azerbaijan
    civil defence force when war erupted with Armenia in 1992. With
    the international media focused at that time on the break-up of the
    former Yugoslavia and the genocide in Rwanda, this border dispute in
    the Caucasus region got very little news coverage in North America.

    Yet it was a brutal clash spanning 24 months that left 30,000 dead
    (mostly civilians), 100,000 wounded and nearly one million people
    forced from their homes. Armenia and Azerbaijan were both former
    republics of the Soviet Union and were formally granted (along with
    Georgia) their independence in May 1992. All three republics were
    allocated the same amount of Soviet military material to form their
    own independent armies.

    Within the recognized borders of Azerbaijan there is a mountainous
    region known as Nagorno-Karabakh where a sizeable Armenian minority
    resided. Taking advantage of Azerbaijan's post-independence political
    disorder, the Armenian army entered the territory in 1992.

    "We fought back, but our local defence battalion was short of heavy
    weaponry - we had only two trucks and 650 men," said Iliyev. "The
    Armenians were well equipped and they were assisted by the Russian 366
    Motorized Rifle Regiment. As a result, we took enormous casualties."

    After completely securing the region, the Armenians continued to push
    into Azerbaijan. Ethnic Azeris were forcibly removed from the newly
    occupied territories.

    Having successfully ousted his political rivals, then-president Heydar
    Aliyev was able to solidify his leadership of Azerbaijan in 1993 and
    ordered creation of a formal army to deal with the crisis situation
    in Nagorno-Karabakh. Within 12 months the Azeris had managed to train
    and field six full infantry brigades, and their deployment to the
    front reversed the Armenian advances.

    "In one offensive in the south we were able to recapture 12 villages
    occupied by the Armenians," said Maj.-Gen. Ramiz Najafov, one of the
    key architects of the fledgling Azerbaijani army. "While in the north
    we were able to destroy an entire Armenian regiment in just three
    days of heavy fighting."

    The campaign became a stalemate, and a ceasefire was signed in 1994.

    After the ceasefire, Armenian forces fortified their positions in the
    occupied Azerbaijani territories; the Azeris built trenches around
    the disputed region and the root causes for the conflict remained
    unresolved. What had been a little-regarded war would soon become an
    almost completely forgotten, but still simmering, flashpoint.

    My discussion with Gurhan Iliyev took place at a pleasant outdoor
    restaurant close to the train station in Saatly, southern Azerbaijan.
    In the company of two other Canadian journalists and escorted by
    officials from the foreign ministry, we had been brought to the city
    to observe firsthand the ongoing plight of the nearly 800,000 Azeris
    who were forcibly displaced during the 1992-94 war.

    Across the tracks from this restaurant is a four-kilometre stretch
    of railway boxcars, which serve as temporary homes for some 2,000
    Azeri internally displaced persons.

    There is minimal privacy because on average, two families share a
    single boxcar. Even after 14 years of continuous residence, there
    are few comforts.

    "Every (displaced person) is entitled to a monthly ration, which
    includes flour, rice, sugar and oil," said Senan Huseynov, the
    Azerbaijani director for refugees. "On top of that they receive an
    allowance of 30,000 manats ($8 Cdn) per month to purchase meat and
    other foodstuffs."

    As well the Saatly boxcar compound we visited a camp of crudely
    constructed mud brick houses, home to about 10,000. The standard
    layout for these shelters is three tiny rooms totalling 240 square
    feet of space and housing up to seven people. The luckiest of the
    refugees are now being relocated into custom-built compounds complete
    with community centres and medical clinics.

    These new housing developments are still intended to be temporary.
    The displaced Azeris remain in virtual limbo - pawns in a political
    process that has been bogged down for 12 years.

    When the 1994 ceasefire was first brokered, the Organization of
    Security and Co-operation in Europe established the Minsk Group to
    oversee and monitor the agreements. To date the United Nations has
    passed a total of four resolutions calling upon the Armenians to
    withdraw their military from the occupied territories as a first step
    to resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh situation.

    That was supposed to be followed by the resettlement of the displaced
    people into their former homes.

    With no threat of any international military force being deployed to
    enforce these resolutions, the Armenians have refused to pull back
    their forces.

    Fact-finding missions and the security organization continually
    report that the Armenians continue to destroy Azeri infrastructure
    while building their own facilities inside the occupied territories
    in flagrant violation of the ceasefire.

    One of the main roadblocks to settling this crisis is that both
    Azerbaijan and Armenia refuse to budge on a referendum on the
    future state of Nagorno-Karabakh. The Armenians want any decision on
    self-determination to be limited to people who live in the region. If
    Azeris are returned to the area before such a vote, the Armenians
    would still represent about a 3:1 majority in Nagorno-Karabakh. The
    Azerbaijani position is that any such referendum must be decided
    by all 8.5 million residents of the country, which would certainly
    reject any separation of the territory.

    Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov recently conceded that Azerbaijan
    would grant Karabakh the "highest level of autonomy in exchange for an
    immediate withdrawal." But the Minsk Group has grown frustrated with
    the lack of any real progress. In a statement released earlier this
    month, U.S. co-chairman Matthew Bryza chided both the Armenian and
    Azerbaijani presidents for their failure to make any concessions.
    In response to the OSCE report, the Azerbaijani president said
    he remains "committed to peace, but he cannot accept the current
    situation."

    To up the political ante, Azerbaijan has embarked on a massive
    military build-up.

    "By next year we will have doubled our defence budget up to a total
    of $1.2 billion (U.S.)," said Maj.-Gen. Najafov. "We will be spending
    the equivalent of the entire Armenian federal budget just on defence."

    While such a build-up would certainly change the regional strategic
    balance, international observers say this posturing is a long way
    from resulting in war. "Most of the money being spent is to increase
    their own salaries, not to add to their tactical capability," said
    one Baku diplomat.

    "They are not out purchasing attack helicopters right now, but if
    they start to do that we'll know they're serious about settling this
    by forceful means."

    That is not to say that the international community takes the
    Nagorno-Karabakh situation lightly. The same diplomat summarized the
    crisis as being mistakenly identified as a frozen conflict. "There
    are tens of thousands of soldiers equipped with tanks manning trenches
    and occasionally shooting at each other," he said.

    "When people are being killed, it is difficult to say the conflict
    is frozen."

    Next week: A new oil pipeline has raised the stakes, and Azerbaijan
    struggles to westernize. Scott Taylor is a columnist for The Chronicle
    Herald and editor in chief of the military affairs magazine Esprit de
    Corps. First of a two-part series by The Chronicle Herald's military
    affairs columnist.

    http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScoti an/518912.html
Working...
X