Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Against Its Own Society

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Against Its Own Society

    AGAINST ITS OWN SOCIETY

    DeFacto Agency
    2008-09-29
    Armenia

    Sergey Nasibian

    Chairman of the NKR CEC Sergey Nasibian's answers to the mass media
    questions Question: The Azerbaijani mass media state that on October
    15 the most boring presidential elections are going to be held
    in the whole history of Azerbaijan. In your opinion, what are the
    reasons for such statements?Answer: Many people, both in Azerbaijan
    and outside the country, understand that the forthcoming elections
    can not be free and just, that the candidates are not provided with
    equal conditions. And it is not surprising for a republic, where the
    son inherits the power from father.

    The elections will indeed be one-man-for-one-seat, as there
    is no a competent, authority-independent civil society in
    Azerbaijan. Unfortunately, the international observers, who do not
    want to fix serious deviations from the democratic norms in Azerbaijan,
    and who, as a rule, get away with phrases like "everything has passed
    within the law", "certain shortcomings have occurred", "these elections
    are better than last year's", etc., unwittingly contribute to this.

    Question: According to you, how can the actual boycott of the elections
    by the Azeri opposition be explained? According to the Azeri mass
    media, one can not feel pre-election activity either among candidates,
    or the electorate.

    Answer: To my mind, it does not seem strange. Everything proceeds
    from the predetermination of the election results. And all the
    symptoms of this are obvious. For instance, even the candidates are
    selectively given money for their pre-election campaign; high-ranking
    officials of the republic, who by law have no right to take part in
    the agitation campaign, participated in the agitation meetings of
    "Yeni Azerbaijan" dominant party; technical equipment and domestic
    appliances of one of the opposition parties have even been stolen... It
    is no coincidence, that some oppositional parties have already signed
    a joint statement on recognizing the presidential elections illegal,
    essentially, because of the fact that the government did not consider
    their requests concerning the free expression of their will in media
    and guaranteeing publications in electronic media.

    At the same time, the boycott of presidential elections by the
    Azeri opposition makes their results doubly predictable. British
    non-governmental organization LINKS has particularly noted this. In its
    report on the pre-election situation in Azerbaijan it mentions that the
    decision of the majority of the Azeri opposition leaves little doubt
    in the "victory" of the candidate from the dominant party Ilham Aliyev.

    Question: On the threshold of presidential elections, the Azeri
    mass media also demonstrates noticeable passiveness in covering the
    pre-election processes. How can you explain this?

    Answer: Perhaps this can be explained by the fact, that the
    governmental newspapers are oriented only to covering the dominant
    party's candidate campaign, while the opposition's newspapers criticize
    the government and do not cover the elections. As a rule, independent
    editions that give a full-fledged coverage of the elections are
    apparently very few in Azerbaijan.

    They confess in Azerbaijan, that a society with legal culture, skills
    of political activity, experience of competitiveness and a dialogue
    with the state, and even institutions, capable of expressing moods
    of this or that group of citizens has not been established in the
    country yet.

    Question: According to you, what consequences will these "boring"
    elections in Azerbaijan have on the region, and particularly, what
    influence will they have on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement?

    Answer: First of all, the non-democratic elections are directed
    against the Azerbaijani society, which will be thrown back again for
    at least 5 years in advancing the democratic processes and creating
    a true democratic society.

    It is also understandable that as a result of such elections the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement process will not win either. Ã~@
    just and overall solution to the problem may be connected mostly
    with the democratization of the societies of conflicting sides and
    the maturity of the civil society.

    --Boundary_(ID_L1A1HIsHmpEpbwBHuIPOhA)--
Working...
X