Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Opp. Activist Accuses Russia, France of Pro-Armenian Stand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Opp. Activist Accuses Russia, France of Pro-Armenian Stand

    AZERI OPPOSITION ACTIVIST ACCUSES RUSSIA, FRANCE OF PRO-ARMENIAN STAND

    Yeni Musavat, Baku
    29 Jan 05


    Text of Kanan report by Azerbaijani newspaper Yeni Musavat on 29
    January headlined "The mediators are trying to dodge responsibility"
    and subheaded "Qabil Huseynli: 'Great powers have complicated the
    conception to resolve the problem'"

    The French co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Bernard Fassier, made
    an interesting statement during his familiarization visit to Baku. The
    French diplomat said that the resolution of the conflict depends on
    the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia. Noting that the Minsk Group
    can only give support to the sides in building dialogue and peace,
    Fassier said on the question of the liberation of Azerbaijan's
    occupied territories in 2005: "The presidents, not the co-chairman,
    can order the pull-out of troops from those territories." Like some of
    his colleagues, the diplomat also gave a hint that concessions are
    expected from Azerbaijan.

    The French diplomat's statement is not the first one of this
    kind. Russian co-chairman Yuriy Merzlyakov has also made similar
    statements recently. The resolution passed by the Parliamentary
    Assembly of the Council of Europe on Nagornyy Karabakh several days
    ago stressed that the resolution of the conflict by and large depends
    on the parties.

    Can Fassier's statement be regarded as a sign that the Minsk Group is
    disavowing its responsibility? A deputy leader of the Musavat party,
    Qabil Huseynli, told us that the French and Russian representatives
    put forward the proposals, which contradict Azerbaijan's interests,
    under a strange scenario.

    "First, Russia makes a proposal, then France starts supporting it. The
    fact that the Russian diplomat insists on Nagornyy Karabakh being
    recognized as a party (to negotiations) is clearly indicative of that
    country's pro-Armenian position, whereas the new French co-chairman
    says that the resolution of the problem depends on the parties."

    The countries which are directly interested in deadlocking the
    Karabakh conflict are trying to insure themselves by making such
    statements, he said.

    "Today, the great powers have complicated the resolution of the
    problem so much, allowed so many double standards and made so many
    ideological and political mistakes that finding a solution has become
    even more difficult. These countries refuse to accept the notions of
    the occupier and of the country under occupation despite this being
    the ABC of any conflict. Today, they do not want to accept the fact
    that Azerbaijani territories were occupied by the Armenian armed
    forces and the entity called Nagornyy Karabakh functions as part of
    Armenia and under the influence of its authorities. They are still
    saying that there is no separatist regime, but a national liberation
    movement in Karabakh. They are openly saying that the Nagornyy
    Karabakh conflict cannot be compared with Dniester, Abkhaz and other
    conflicts. In other words, there are enough double standards in their
    approach. In this case, there must be a mistake in the very approach
    to a solution to the problem. Those states have intentionally made
    mistakes in their approach to the problem. Now they are saying that
    the parties themselves should find a common language."

    The expert regards the statement by the new co-chairman as a call for
    Azerbaijan to make concessions.

    "Armenia does not accept any concessions and faces no pressure, while
    Azerbaijan is being persuaded to make concessions over the launch of
    some projects and pressure. France and Russia have not recognized
    Armenia as an occupying country so far. They stress the importance of
    self-determination of nations when it comes to Azerbaijan, but when it
    comes to other states they underline the importance of territorial
    integrity. This insincerity brings the problem to deadlock."

    It is not right to implicate the OSCE Minsk Group, because the
    co-chairing countries have the ultimate responsibility, he said.

    "We need to look at the policy of the countries in the group. The
    French co-chairman implements the instructions of his state. France
    and its nationalist president Jacques Chirac blatantly support the
    Armenians and Russia backs Armenia with which it has a strategic
    cooperation treaty in every possible way. In other words, these
    countries have made so many mistakes testifying to their pro-Armenian
    position that these statements sound hypocritical."
Working...
X