Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

`They Brought Ramil Safarov, So What...?'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • `They Brought Ramil Safarov, So What...?'

    `They Brought Ramil Safarov, So What...?'

    March 29 2013


    According to Rauf Mirgadirov, a political analyst of Zerkalo, `it
    doesn't yield anything, besides a show and flag-wavers' chants.' * Mr.
    Mirgadirov, the position of the Azeri government on the issue of the
    Stepanakert airport is rather negative, whereas there are land
    communications between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh; besides, this
    issue seems to be a new excuse for stalemating the Karabakh
    negotiating process. Why does this issue receive such a response? * I
    think that the issue has a few aspects. First of all, let us consider
    it from the legal perspective, and in this sense, Azerbaijan's
    position is very strong. Many people don't take into account that air
    communications are regulated by international treaties, every
    international flight must get an international confirmation. So the
    issue could have been solved theoretically, if Azerbaijan's and
    Armenia's respective institutions had been able to agree, but in that
    case, Armenia doesn't want it, since it considers Nagorno-Karabakh as
    an independent state and thinks that this issue is exceptionally
    between Armenia and Karabakh. However, both Armenia and Azerbaijan are
    parties to international treaties, and this issue is regulated in that
    area. Azerbaijan uses that in the legal field, and I think that it
    does the right thing. The other aspect of the issue is why such an
    issue arises when the sides assert that they are interested in the
    settlement of the conflict. Moreover, the sides take steps that
    escalate the conflict - for example, Safarov's extradition, the issue
    of the airport. If the Safarov case is more explicit, and from the
    short-term perspective, both sides are offered an opportunity of
    exploiting that event for advertising, then the airport issue may
    escalate the situation from the long-term perspective - for example,
    in order to prevent any flight, according to the domino principle,
    military operations may resume with unpredictable consequences. The
    governments of both sides of the conflict realize that the peoples are
    tired of this conflict. Therefore, some ostentatious steps are needed
    that `we can take this step,' `we can do this too....' They brought
    Ramil Safarov, so what...? What does Azerbaijan gain...? It yields
    nothing, besides a show and flag-wavers' support and chants. The same
    thing applies to the issue of the airport; what will Armenia gain...? I
    think given the sum of money spent on it, it won't yield much benefit,
    unless the conflict is settled. Suppose there are two flights a week
    from Armenia; no serious, self-respecting air company will make
    flights to Karabakh, because big air companies make flights to Baku
    and will not wish to lose the Azeri market due to making flights to
    Karabakh, moreover, destinations in Azerbaijan are not confined to
    Baku alone, there are other Azeri cities as well. So saying that it is
    of humanitarian importance, when there are no internal flights in
    Armenia, I think it is not so; it is also a merely ostentatious step,
    in order to show to society that some step is taken to put into effect
    the idea of Nagorno-Karabakh's independence. These are just
    ostentatious steps taken both by Armenia and by Azerbaijan. * Akram
    Aylisli, an Azeri writer, was pressured by both governmental and
    non-governmental organizations in Azerbaijan after his novel `Stone
    Dreams' had been published in Druzhba Narodov, a Russian monthly. Mr.
    Mirgadirov, what is the reason for such an intolerant attitude of
    Azeri society, in your opinion? * Let me answer with a question; how
    will they treat you, if you state now that you recognize the `Khojalu
    genocide'...? What response will there be...? This issue also has
    different aspects. That novel is a political work; it was the author's
    message sent to the Armenian and Azeri societies. However, neither
    Armenian nor Azeri society, I should say intellectuals, took note of
    that message. We approach the most important issue here; are the
    societies ready to listen to this or that message or call...? This is
    the important issue. Akram Aylisli had the right to that message, and
    I defended him, I wrote that it was absurd what was going on in Azeri
    society - burning books etc. However, it is obvious that there was no
    serious debate on the purpose of that novel, and the messages were not
    successful; there was no response from the Armenian side, and Azeri
    society responded to that accordingly? * What is the situation in
    Azerbaijan? We know that there were protests; there is discontent. Is
    that only social discontent or also political? Is there danger of
    losing power in Azerbaijan? * There is a political system in Armenia -
    no matter good or bad - with its rules of the game, whereas in
    Azerbaijan, the political system is destroyed. Formally, there are
    opposition parties that criticize, but they are at the level of
    enthusiasts' club; they gather, talk, and leave. Basically, they have
    no influence on the political system; the government has destroyed
    that, and this is the worst case, because it is not possible to
    predict anything in such a situation. There are manifestations of
    discontent, there are protests. But when will potential energy turn
    into actions...? It is energy of the mob's self-organization; those are
    discontent groups, which are out of the political system? As in the
    Arab world, it was the mob's revolution, not that of the political
    system; it was just that the discontent was ripe, and suddenly, there
    were explosions for different reasons. No one can predict where it
    will happen and from what it will start in Azerbaijan. There may be an
    explosion in five years, in two months, or in two days. The society in
    Azerbaijan has awoken; the society is tired of such stability. It is
    stability for them; it is stability created by them, for them [he
    means the government]. How long can this last...? Generally, when
    serious problems arise both in our country and in your country, the
    governments start to talk about stability and the Nagorno-Karabakh
    issue. Well, the most stable condition is in the crematorium and in
    the grave; let's turn the country into a grave, and everything will be
    very stable.... However, it cannot be so; people get tired. How long can
    the same people be in power? Everyone wants to live well. Yes, the
    discontent in Azerbaijan is of social nature, but in Baku, for
    example, there is discontent with the fact that soldiers die under
    peaceful conditions. The youth take to the streets; so this is a
    political problem related to the commander-in-chief, the president.
    EMMA GABRIELYAN Aravot Daily

    Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/03/29/153281/

    © 1998 - 2013 Aravot - News from Armenia

Working...
X