Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia: Using Amnesties To Avoid Judicial Reform?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia: Using Amnesties To Avoid Judicial Reform?

    ARMENIA: USING AMNESTIES TO AVOID JUDICIAL REFORM?

    EurasiaNet.org
    Nov 1 2013

    November 1, 2013 - 4:39pm, by Gayane Abrahamyan

    The Armenian government's recent amnesty of several hundred prisoners
    has more to do with politics than a desire to reform the country's
    justice system, human-rights activists contend. Authorities in Yerevan
    concede the existence of problems, but assert change is coming.

    Under an amnesty announced by President Serzh Sargsyan at the end of
    September, several hundred people were released from jail. Among them
    was opposition Armenian National Congress activist Tigran Arakelian,
    dubbed Armenia's "last political prisoner." Arakelian spent over two
    years in jail waiting for trial after being charged with allegedly
    breaking a police officer's nose during a 2011 scuffle in Yerevan.

    Human rights activists welcomed the releases as a way, however small,
    to take pressure off what they claim are Armenia's overpopulated
    prisons. At the same time, they characterized the amnesty as "a
    political tool." Authorities publically tied the amnesty to the 22nd
    anniversary of Armenia's declaration of independence,

    Three times over the past five years, Armenia has declared a
    prisoner-amnesty, measures proposed by President Serzh Sargsyan and
    approved by parliament, which is controlled by Sargsyan's Republican
    Party of Armenia.

    Government critics saw the first two, in 2009 and 2011 as needed to
    reduce social tension connected to the post-election confrontation in
    2008 in Yerevan. This time, as well, the government needs the "veil
    of a benefactor" to conceal popular disgruntlement over the way that
    justice is administered in Armenia, according to Avetik Ishkhanian,
    leader of the Armenian Helsinki Committee.

    Among the recent cases that have called into question whether justice
    is blind, include the release of Tigran Khachatrian, son of Suren
    Khachatrian, a former powerful governor and Sargsyan ally, on charges
    of murder and illegal-weapons-ownership; the lack of suspects for
    violent attacks on activists opposing Armenia joining the Eurasian
    Union; and prison sentences of up to 2.5 years (later canceled by
    the amnesty) handed down to three young men convicted, on spurious
    evidence, of burning a hay-cart.

    "There seems to be an attempt at playing human," Ishkhanian commented,
    drily, referring to the amnesty.

    Arman Musinian, a representative of the Armenian National Congress,
    claims the amnesty says nothing about the government's "change of
    heart" about the way that justice is administered. Just the opposite;
    the amnesty is another example of the government, not the courts,
    being the final arbiter of justice. "This is simply the authorities'
    message, saying 'We can murder and stay unpunished, and you will go
    to prison for having done no wrong if we do not pardon you because
    the courts are subordinate to us,'" Musinian alleged.

    Senior government officials declined to discuss the amnesty with
    EurasiaNet.org.

    During the parliamentary debate about the measure, Justice Minister
    Hrair Tovmasian urged the opposition not "to politicize" the amnesty,
    adding that its purpose is "humanitarian" rather than "to fix judicial
    errors."

    Arman Danielian, director of the Civil Society Institute, a human
    rights organization, has a long list of such "judicial errors."

    Even after a large-scale amnesty, he argued, "in a year, the prisons
    get overpopulated again, because conviction is used for the smallest of
    crimes, posting bail is practically never used, alternative punishment
    is not applied, neither are pardons."

    Deputy Justice Minister Grigor Muradian, who is overseeing reforms
    of the justice system, claims change is in the works. A large-scale,
    four-year reform program, launched in 2012, will include the adoption
    of a completely new Criminal Code, offender rehabilitation projects,
    and the new practice of suspended sentences. The package, if fully
    implemented, will result in "a truly fair justice system, of an
    absolutely different quality than now," Muradian asserted.

    The problem, he said, is that no one believes this makeover will be
    implemented. Indeed, some human-rights activists scoffed that they've
    heard such promises before.

    "There is almost 80-percent distrust among people toward the justice
    system, and it is rather challenging to implement a program when it
    is not trusted, or is believed to be doomed," Muradian said in an
    interview with EurasiaNet.org.

    There is ample reason for skepticism when it comes to the courts,
    Ishkhanian said, pointing out that since 1991 Armenia has carried out
    multiple rounds of judicial reform. But the reforms have routinely
    failed, Ishkhanian added, because "judges are appointed and removed
    by the ... president, implying direct subordination to one person,
    while corruption remains the decisive factor" in rulings.

    For all of the government's promised reforms, they do not address a
    larger issue, asserted Danielian, the civil society activist. "The
    mentality we have inherited from Soviet times still exists," he said.

    "[Judges] cannot imagine that when dealing with non-dangerous crimes,
    they can apply nominal sentences, fines. All of it is now provided
    for by law; however, it is never applied in practice."

    "Changing the legislation means little, because the implementers
    [of the law] do not change," Danielian continued.

    Meanwhile, some beneficiaries of a presidential amnesty don't
    necessarily feel that the government's action was "humanitarian."

    "I do not accept their amnesty. Who is pardoning me? The kind grandpa
    who acquits a murderer?" scoffed Arakelian. He was referring to
    59-year-old President Sargsyan and the decision to release of Tigran
    Khachatrian from prison.

    "It is me who has to yet pardon them," Arakelian said

    Deputy Justice Minister Muradian declined to address the September 21
    amnesty, but does not deny that harmful traditions challenge Armenia's
    justice system. "We do have traditions that need to be broken and
    overcome; changing the public perception of these [traditions] may
    take decades," he said. "Proper" reforms can speed up the process,
    he went on.

    Government critics are keeping their expectations low. Said Musinian;
    "Arakelian is free now, but the fight against injustice is going to
    be fiercer than before."

    Editor's note: Gayane Abrahamyan is a freelance reporter and editor
    in Yerevan.

Working...
X