Tweet
SHANT HARUTYUNYAN HAS REACHED THE PENULTIMATE STAGE OF THE REVOLUTION
November 1 2013
Chairman of Tseghakron party, Shant Harutyunyan, still two years ago
had decided that he was going to carry out a revolution in Armenia in
2013. It was this decision that led him to the Liberty Square for a
timeless hunger strike. As to how he views the revolution with a hunger
strike, Mr. Harutyunyan does not explain, "Should I have come with a
poster, they would have said how he views carrying out a revolution
with a poster, should I have come with flags, they would have said how
he views carrying out a revolution with flags. What is significant? "
According to him, one cannot carry out a revolution, but it could be
one of us to start. To our question whether he intends to gather the
revolutionaries around him, he said, "I have no intention. I think that
the situation in Armenia is such that everyone understands that without
a radical change, which is called a revolution, the country can not
be regulated. There are many people who want to change values in the
country, making major changes; it is likely that they will come out to
the streets, as well. I realize that I'm not Tork Angegh, and I can not
carry out revolution alone, but I have come out of the fight." As to
what actions has he developed to carry out the revolution he wanted,
Shant Harutyunyan did not want to mention. He has not thought about
how to make a revolution if nobody joins him. "I have no problem
with gathering people around me. I've come out for the revolution,
I know that my fight is right. If I do not do this righteous step,
I would discredit myself. This is simply necessary. Why shouldn't
I come out to fight, to sacrifice the truth, why should I reach
consensus with fabrication?" To our question that he went on hunger
strike against the fabrication during the presidential elections,
did it change the situation, what the sit-in strike will change,
Mr. Harutyunyan said, "Why do you remember it... I, as a citizen,
have kept my active civic position, although I had not considered
the hunger strike at the presidential elections as a tool of fight to
save the country. I have considered the revolution as the only tool
to save the country." He believes that his sit-in strike will change
the situation I the country only "When the public consciousness is
changed. It depends on the atmosphere of the country.
If this is the situation, nothing will change. If you can activate
the feelings of a layer, for which there are other values: life in
truth, civic consciousness, then the situation will change. But
if all have put up with the lies, have become adaptable, even if
hundreds of thousands of political power get out to the street,
nothing will change." Shant Harutyunyan believes that his commenced
fight is penultimate stage of the revolution, and at the last stage,
"The victory can be corroborated only by the change of the power."
Arpine SIMONYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/11/01/162291/
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
November 1 2013
Chairman of Tseghakron party, Shant Harutyunyan, still two years ago
had decided that he was going to carry out a revolution in Armenia in
2013. It was this decision that led him to the Liberty Square for a
timeless hunger strike. As to how he views the revolution with a hunger
strike, Mr. Harutyunyan does not explain, "Should I have come with a
poster, they would have said how he views carrying out a revolution
with a poster, should I have come with flags, they would have said how
he views carrying out a revolution with flags. What is significant? "
According to him, one cannot carry out a revolution, but it could be
one of us to start. To our question whether he intends to gather the
revolutionaries around him, he said, "I have no intention. I think that
the situation in Armenia is such that everyone understands that without
a radical change, which is called a revolution, the country can not
be regulated. There are many people who want to change values in the
country, making major changes; it is likely that they will come out to
the streets, as well. I realize that I'm not Tork Angegh, and I can not
carry out revolution alone, but I have come out of the fight." As to
what actions has he developed to carry out the revolution he wanted,
Shant Harutyunyan did not want to mention. He has not thought about
how to make a revolution if nobody joins him. "I have no problem
with gathering people around me. I've come out for the revolution,
I know that my fight is right. If I do not do this righteous step,
I would discredit myself. This is simply necessary. Why shouldn't
I come out to fight, to sacrifice the truth, why should I reach
consensus with fabrication?" To our question that he went on hunger
strike against the fabrication during the presidential elections,
did it change the situation, what the sit-in strike will change,
Mr. Harutyunyan said, "Why do you remember it... I, as a citizen,
have kept my active civic position, although I had not considered
the hunger strike at the presidential elections as a tool of fight to
save the country. I have considered the revolution as the only tool
to save the country." He believes that his sit-in strike will change
the situation I the country only "When the public consciousness is
changed. It depends on the atmosphere of the country.
If this is the situation, nothing will change. If you can activate
the feelings of a layer, for which there are other values: life in
truth, civic consciousness, then the situation will change. But
if all have put up with the lies, have become adaptable, even if
hundreds of thousands of political power get out to the street,
nothing will change." Shant Harutyunyan believes that his commenced
fight is penultimate stage of the revolution, and at the last stage,
"The victory can be corroborated only by the change of the power."
Arpine SIMONYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/11/01/162291/
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress