Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkish Attitude: A Chronology

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkish Attitude: A Chronology

    Turkish Attitude: A Chronology

    http://asbarez.com/117891/turkish-attitude-a-chronology/
    Tuesday, December 31st, 2013

    BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

    The past year has been rife with intriguing developments on our
    Turkish (non-Azeri) front. So I realized it would probably be good to
    put those often-positive-seeming events in some context.

    Some 1,000 years ago, Turks arrived in Asia Minor - Anatolia and the
    Armenian Plateau. That's when our interaction with them began. These
    marauding horsemen proceeded to establish rival domains which fought
    one another until Turkish statehood was consolidated in the form of
    the Ottoman Empire after the fall of Byzantium in 1453. All along
    those five centuries, the natives (Armenians and others living further
    west) were being trampled figuratively, and probably even literally,
    under the hooves of these newcomers to our homeland.

    But despite what might have been expected, and as happened in most
    other empires, the onset of the Ottoman era brought no real relief, at
    least in the form of personal safety and economic revival, to the
    subjects of this new state. Periodic massacres continued, naturally
    aimed at Armenians, and others, who had to be tamed and controlled.

    After Ottoman expansion was halted at the gates of Vienna in 1683, the
    slow decay of the empire began. One aspect of the self-consumption
    that plagued the vast lands ruled from Constantinople was the corrupt,
    expropriative, system of tax-farming that fell heaviest on the
    peasantry, meaning Armenians. Someone would buy, from the government,
    the taxation of a certain area. As long as the Sultan got his
    predetermined amount, that person was free to extract as much money
    from the subjects of `his' area as he wanted and could. This resulted
    in families losing their lands and and/or having to send sons to the
    cities to work to pay the exorbitant taxes. The political benefit of
    this was the slow removal of `undesirable' populations (Armenians)
    from their homelands, allowing settlement there by Turks and other
    Moslems who were being forced out of the periphery of the empire. This
    gradual ethnic cleansing suited the purposes of the Turkish rulers.

    But this was not the totality of the ongoing repression. Armenians,
    second-class citizens under sharia law as implemented in the Ottoman
    Empire, despite being a `people of the book' and therefore deserving
    of Islamic protection, the loyal millet, and the financial backbone of
    the empire, were subject to constant persecution. Whether it was
    having their tongues cut out for speaking Armenian (as my grandmother
    had learned from her father), being forced to convert to Islam, or
    having no recourse in the country's courts because of their `infidel'
    status.

    Those four-and-a-half centuries of de-Armenianization of the
    population of the Armenian plateau paved the way for the 1915-23
    period Genocide, definitive expropriation, and establishment of a
    supposedly mono-national-Turkish state on the ruins of the occupied
    Western portion of the Armenians' homeland.

    But the Genocide wasn't enough for the murderous Young Turks
    ideological heirs, Ataturk and his Turkish-chauvinist minions. See
    `Depriving Anatolian Armenians of Education' in the current issue of
    `The Armenian Weekly' in which the story is told of how Armenians were
    kept under- or un-educated in the post 1923 time frame. This was
    nothing but a continuation of the forced removal of Armenians from our
    homeland. But of course, this subtle pressure wasn't enough. During
    the Kurdish uprising of 1937-38 in Dersim, the more traditional and
    murderous Turkish techniques reappeared. As had happened for
    centuries, many Armenians had `become' Kurds during the Genocide. A
    significant number of those were in Dersim. As the rebellion was
    quelled, Kurds were promised leniency if they ratted-out those hidden
    Armenians. Once their identity was revealed, they were killed, and the
    Kurds who exposed them were also penalized for harboring them!

    And with this, we can perhaps accept that the Turks' bloody ways of
    eliminating Armenians from `their' (the Turks') country ended and we
    transitioned to more `civilized' processes of conducting anti-Armenian
    campaigns. This might be when the real hatred of Armenians started to
    wane since... there were no significant numbers of evident Armenians
    left to hate. All that was left was the `Armenian' as an evil
    caricature, which is what we must contend with even today. Most, who
    had not been killed, exiled, or scared away, were concentrated in
    Bolis.

    The 1930s also witnessed the beginning of the out-of-country external
    propaganda campaign that Turkey has waged unabated, and in fact,
    escalated, against Armenians and Armenian interests, to this day. Its
    ambassador to the United States prevented the making of Forty Days of
    Musa Dagh into a film

    In keeping with its more `civilized' approach, but still manifesting
    hatred towards Armenians and other non-Turkish, non-Moslem minorities,
    and still lusting after Armenians' and others' un-expropriated
    possessions, in 1942, Varlik Vergisi - the wealth tax - was enacted as a
    means of stealing Armenian's post-Genocide holdings. Obviously, this
    was just another way of driving Armenians out. While abolished just
    two years later, Varlik Vergisi just confirmed Ankara's unstated
    policy towards Armenians. They were to be driven out. Those of our
    compatriots who remained under Turkish rule suffered the same ignominy
    as in the pre-Genocide period. Properties were stolen, Armenians
    schools were kept under destructive state scrutiny, and Armenian life
    was generally squeezed to make things uncomfortable. This led to a
    steady trickling exodus from Bolis, but the community there was
    replenished, ironically, with those of our compatriots who were even
    worse off in the `interior' of Turkey, i.e. Turkish-occupied Western
    Armenia.

    Meanwhile, the external front was heating up. As Armenians in the
    Diaspora came to be organized and set on the path of post-Genocide
    economic recovery, we were also becoming more active politically and
    diplomatically, demanding the 3-Rs - recognition, reparations, return
    of lands. Naturally, this led to Turkey responding. An excellent
    example is the 1971-85 saga of UN Economic and Social Council's
    Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of
    Minorities effort to prepare a report about genocide. Inescapably, the
    Armenian example had a significant place in it, which led to an
    ultimately unsuccessful Turkish effort to exclude it.

    Starting in 1975, a roughly decade long string of attacks on Turkish
    diplomats commenced. Unsurprisingly, this elicited a response from the
    Turkish government. But this response did not just consist of the one
    commonly comes to mind, i.e. Turks calling Armenians murderers and
    trying to cover up their crimes. In 1978, the Turkish government
    quietly reached out to the leadership of the ARF to meet and come to
    some arrangement. The ARF immediately involved the Hnchags and
    Ramgavars and met with the Turks. Not much came of it since all that
    was proffered was some form of recognition. But, we'll never know
    since the third of Turkey's four coups cut the process short. Perhaps
    this marked the very beginning of Turkey's `split personality'
    regarding Armenians and Armenian issues.

    The 1980s witnessed unabated anti-Armenian Turkish government and
    probably even societal attitudes. Examples abound. On a very
    impactfully personal level, the first time I encountered a living
    human being who unabashedly denied the Genocide was in 1980 when then
    Turkish Foreign Minister Ilter Turkmen spoke at the University of
    Pennsylvania's law school. There was the 1982 conference about
    genocide that ultimately was held in Tel Aviv, with the Israeli
    government withdrawing its sponsorship after tremendous Turkish
    pressure, in which the Armenian Genocide was addressed. Turkey's
    efforts on the academic front really took off, with the poster-child
    of denialism becoming UCLA's Stanford Shaw. In 1982, the beginnings of
    what is now New York's Turkish parade began under the guise of
    celebrating `Children's Day' which falls, oh-so-conveniently, on April
    23 in Turkey. Also in the summer of 1982, a trip to occupied Armenian
    territories by a small group of Diasporan Armenians (including future
    Armenian foreign minister and almost-president Raffi Hovannisian)
    ended badly with inappropriate searches conducted of their persons by
    Turkish authorities who confiscated most of the photographs they had
    taken.

    But something must have been changing in Turkish society. The
    repressive regime installed by Ataturk was starting to come apart.
    Plus, the assassinations of the Turkish diplomats and the Genocide
    related publicity and activity in parliamentary and diplomatic
    settions had to trigger some thinking Turks to inquire what the
    hullabaloo was all about.

    In 1988 Armen Aroyan started taking groups of Armenians to visit their
    ancestral homes and homeland. He has continued since then. This could
    not have happened without the knowledge and tacit acceptance of the
    Turkish authorities. His were not the first, or only, trips. I already
    mentioned one. Another is the one that Moushegh Kheteyan (Mitch
    Kehetian) had been on 1965, the same year as my grandmother visited
    Giligia and elsewhere in what's called Turkey. This is evidence of
    something shifting.

    In 1990, the Turkish Historical Society, the seat of official Genocide
    denialism, held its 11th Congress of Turkish History, in Ankara, at
    which included 16 papers on Armenian topics were presented. One of
    those was by Levon Marashlian who was the first of us to dare to
    venture into that lion's den and present reality to a denial-addled
    Turkish society. This was not an easy step to take. I remember both
    Levon, and Armen Aroyan, were viewed with some consternation for their
    activities. It was also in the 1990s that the partially, selectively,
    opened Ottoman archives started being researched by people who were
    not Turkish government lackeys. Meanwhile, more Turkish scholars were
    looking into Armenian issues and deciding to escape the denialism of
    their society. More evidence of shifting...

    Yet all along, formal Turkish policy remained unchanged. Whether it
    was opposing passage of commemorative resolutions in the House or
    Senate of the U.S. Congress and legislatures around the world or
    pressuring (in 1995) Argentina's President Menem to veto a law
    recognizing the Armenian Genocide, the Turks kept battling truth and
    simple reality on every `battlefield' imaginable - not just
    legislatures and presidents, but all diplomatic venues, the media, and
    academia. Yet something had to be brewing.

    Then came 2002 and what I'll call the `AKP shift' when the Adalet ve
    Kalkinma Partisi (Justice and Development party) was elected to
    power. Our compatriots in Bolis indicated this was an overall
    positive. Things started to loosen up internally and Turkish civil
    society seemed to commence a very early, and fragile, spring bloom,
    despite the Islamic/religious basis of this new ruling party. Now,
    more activists INSIDE Turkey were coming around to truth. In 2005, at
    Bilgi University in Bolis, a conference somewhat grandiosely titled
    `Ottoman Armenians During the Decline of the Empire: Issues of
    Scientific Responsibility and Democracy' was held after two previous
    attempts to convene it were blocked. The murder of Hrant Dink turned
    thousands of Turks out onto the streets claiming `we are all
    Armenians'. Things really seemed to be improving or changing, at least
    on the non-governmental side of life in Turkey. This decade seemed to
    deepen, enshrine, and confirm the split personality I noted earlier.
    Turks want to know the truth, still, they simultaneously can't handle
    the truth because it involves admitting monstrous acts by their close
    relatives. The government wants to be rid of the `Armenian problem'
    but hasn't the political will and a society prepared to handle the
    ramifications.

    Yet, during the same first decade of this century, we had the 2005
    disclosure by Sibel Edmonds of what can only be described as the
    bribery of Dennis Hastert, the Speaker of the House of
    Representatives, by Turks so he would block passage of a resolution
    commemorating the Armenian Genocide, which he did. In the same year,
    we had Dogu Perincek going to Switzerland to pick a fight over the
    ability to deny the Genocide despite Swiss law. This led to his being
    found guilty and a series of appeals which just days ago absolved him
    of wrongdoing because his freedom of expression had allegedly been
    abridged since the Armenian Genocide is not a `fact' in the same way
    the Holocaust is, according to five of the seven judges of the
    European Court of Human Rights which heard the latest appeal. Of
    course there is the 2007 murder of Hrant Dink by a 17-year old. What
    does that age say about where Turks' minds are when it comes to
    Armenians? The murder happened on the cusp of Turkish government and
    society interface - a boundary still murky, as who exactly organized
    the murder remains hidden and the subject of ongoing court cases. Of
    course the infamous 2008/9 Armenia-Turkey protocols are an outstanding
    example of Turkish government duplicity and commitment to evading
    responsibility for the Genocide and expropriation of Armenian land and
    property.

    Moving to the current decade, the reopening 2010 Soorp Khach on Lake
    Van's Akhtamar Island aroused both hope and suspicion. It is now
    formally a museum, with extremely limited rights of use by the
    Armenian community as a church, absent a cross on the dome, and with
    what some argued was inappropriate material used in the renovation.
    But 2010 also witnessed a failed attempt to put a monument of Ataturk
    in a public place in Buenos Aires. Interestingly there's a similar
    process afoot in the Los Angeles basin's City of Carson even a now. A
    fundraiser for it was held just two weeks ago! What purpose does
    erecting a statue of a mass-murderer serve?

    2011 witnessed the removal by the central government of a
    Turkish-Armenian friendship monument that had been erected by local
    authorities in Kars. A French attempt to pass a law criminalizing
    Genocide denial was thwarted, at least in part due to Turkish
    pressure. Yet in 2012, the Soorp Giragos church of Dikranagerd was
    reopened and returned to the Armenian Patriarchate by the local
    authorities, this time by Kurds, who have been making ever stronger
    overtures of friendship to Armenians. Just weeks ago, a conference was
    held in Bolis about crypto-Armenians, eliciting some heart-wrenching
    discussions. Yet we learn from Asbarez that, simultaneously, the
    `Turkish Government Targets Academics Studying Genocide'.

    Need any more evidence of the confusing, split personality of Turkey,
    its society, and the humans composing it? This situation makes it very
    difficult and risky for Armenians to engage, but engage we must, and
    we are. Research about the Hamshentzees has been going on for a number
    of years. These are Armenians who were Islamicized over two centuries
    ago, yet still retain bits and pieces of Western Armenian in their
    rapidly disappearing local dialect. Obviously, the Turkish government
    knows of this and allows it, much like the tours of Western Armenia.
    Yet this is the same government that destroys Armenian monuments,
    actively in the past and through neglect in the present.

    While some scholars, intellectuals, and sectors of civil society are
    soul searching and reaching out to Armenians, trying to find a way to
    make progress, other parts of Turkish society are busy spouting
    anti-Armenian hate. One example is attributing Armenian origins or
    connections to the Kurdish movement which has led to much loss of life
    and fear in Turkey over the past three decades. There are the ongoing
    efforts to block Armenian Genocide resolutions/proclamations and
    school curricula implemented by governments outside Turkey. Now, this
    is increasingly taken on by the non-governmental Gulen movement. It is
    the same religious sector of Turkish society which helped bring the
    AKP to power a decade ago leading to the `opening' in Turkish society
    we've been witnessing. And, in what might be the height of cynicism,
    Turks are reaching out to Native Americans, themselves victims of
    Genocide, in what can only be explained as a way of deflecting the
    charge of genocide that attaches so strongly to Turkey.

    All of this is the cauldron of confusion that constitutes Turkish
    society. This doesn't even include the anti-Armenian activity of
    Azerbaijan's government, a parallel track to Turkey's efforts, both
    aimed at delegitimizing our rightful claims for restorative justice.

    But the confusion, the lack of clarity, and the absence of a societal
    consensus in Turkey regarding Armenians and Armenian issues cannot
    last forever. At some point, some force, governmental or otherwise,
    will succeed in forging a consensus. The more we push and engage, the
    better that outcome is likely to be. But I cannot imagine an outcome
    that I would describe as being `good' for at least another generation.
    In fact, we may end up seeing a few cycles of split
    personality/confusion/new consensus before Turkey finally escapes its
    self-built trap of denial.

    The first of these cycles, the one we're in now, may well come to a
    close in 2015 with the 100th anniversary of the Genocide. The outcome
    might be the offer of immediate citizenship in Turkey and the right to
    return for all descendents of Genocide survivors. Turkey's government
    could announce this without ever using the word Genocide, just
    `descendents of former inhabitants' might be its formulation. What an
    ingenious trap! And it's very possible since I hear that this idea, of
    granting citizenship, is often broached in casual discussions by Turks
    with connections to officialdom. Turkey could trumpet its
    `magnanimity' while calculating that very few Armenians are going to
    take up its offer. And, even if many or most did, what would that
    change? Anyone returning would be under the government's thumb. What
    would we return to? Would our ancestral lands be handed back over to
    us or would we have to buy homes? What rights would we have? What
    guarantees of representation, of personal safety?

    Let's keep pushing, engaging, educating, watching, and optimizing
    every opportunity that presents when it comes to Turkey and Armenian
    rights, but always with extreme discernment and caution.

Working...
X