Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Moving Force Of Colored Revolutions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Moving Force Of Colored Revolutions

    THE MOVING FORCE OF COLORED REVOLUTIONS
    Karen Nahapetyan

    Hayots Ashkhar Daily
    02 Sep 2008
    Armenia

    Many of us have most probably noticed that the moving force of the
    native liberation movement is far not Armenian Pan National Movement,
    or "Hanrapetutyun" or the People's Party of Armenia, but rather the
    non-governmental organizations, the so-called public organizations. It
    is by the help of the before mentioned organizations that all the
    protest functions are usually organized.

    It is one of the modern revolutionary technologies. The experience
    of the recent years has displayed the privileges of the public
    organizations over the classical political parties. Flexibility,
    destabilization, activities of various directions, high level of
    dynamism and many other peculiarities of those organizations make
    the counteraction of the law enforcers and the public services rather
    difficult.

    There are lots of social-political organizations in our reality. They
    are civil-public institutions, structures of the self-organization
    of the citizens in different spheres of life and activity.

    Meanwhile, there are many other public organizations, which are engaged
    exclusively in political activity, moreover, it is for that very
    purpose that they are established, by the help of foreign grants. And
    this evidently goes beyond the frameworks of the civil society.

    In our view it is high time to give assessment to the activity of
    the =0 D so-called civil institutions with political trend, which
    completely changes the concept of the civil society.

    Today the difference between the civil public organizations and the
    political processes is intentionally eradicated; this should have long
    ago become a matter of analyses. Whereas the public organizations
    usually appear with the role of a judge that can take decisions
    regarding the political organization of society and the activity of
    the state institutions.

    But if the parties - the classical participants of the political
    processes have to regularly prove their own authority, by their
    participation during the elections and show the level of the public
    support by the votes gained (that is to say their right to introduce
    their ideas to the society), then the public organizations engaged
    in politics think they don't have to prove their right to give
    lessons on politics. They simply have a claim on the position of the
    prosecutor. Do they have the right?

    The funding and the establishment of similar public organizations
    is the component of the organization of any colored revolution. For
    example before "the revolution of tulips" in Kirgizistan, around 5-8
    thousand similar organizations were established in this country by
    foreign grants. By the number of the public organizations Kigizistan
    was a champion in CIS. It was really ridiculous; almost each village
    had its own public organization.

    By establishing the se organizations the foreign funds were trying
    to emphasize their importance. Should we mention that by increasing
    the number of the public organizations they were far not trying to
    establish civil society and democracy in this country?

    Though how can we even speak about democracy? Democracy, in the 21st
    century, has become a matter of political blackmail, interference in
    the internal affairs of sovereign states and false speculations. It
    has become a tool by the help of which they realize all the before
    mentioned, in which the public organizations established by the
    foreign grants serve as a moving force.

    At the end we must underscore that the era of new colored revolutions
    continue in the post-soviet countries. Of course they fail more and
    more, because people are no more optimistic towards them. Our neighbor
    Georgia is a bright example of what has been said.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X