Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Palin, legislators make new effort against [Sudanese] genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Palin, legislators make new effort against [Sudanese] genocide

    Palin, legislators make new effort against genocide

    Presidential campaign brought new attention to Darfur divestment

    Sunday, February 01, 2009

    Last fall's contentious presidential campaign may give a boost to a
    bill that failed last legislative session despite bipartisan support.

    Members of the Legislature wanted to take a stand against genocide in
    Darfur by banning state investments in companies that support the
    government of Sudan. An effort to do that failed last year after top
    state investment managers balked at the restriction and some
    Republican legislators stopped a divestment bill in committee.

    This year the effort is back, with the bill's sponsors thinking the
    high-profile issue will have more success.

    "It should be fundamental that we don't support regimes such as this,"
    said Rep. Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, who is a sponsor of one of the
    divestment bills this year.

    Opponents, however, say divestment will be complicated and potentially
    costly to implement, and will do little or nothing to stop investment
    in Sudan. For a time last year, those opponents included the Palin
    administration.

    In Palin's vice-presidential debate with Democrat Joe Biden, Palin
    boasted of her support for divestment of Alaskan money from
    Sudan. Democratic Rep. Les Gara of Anchorage was quick to point out it
    was opposition from Permanent Fund and state Treasury Division
    managers that caused it to fail in the last Legislature, despite Palin
    announcing her support too late in the session for it to pass.

    This session, five divestment bills have already been introduced,
    including from Palin.

    "This is unprecedented, where we have a recognized genocide that's
    being labeled as such while its happening," said Pat Galvin,
    Commissioner of the Department of Revenue, which manages billions in
    retirement and other government funds. He also serves as a trustee of
    the Alaska Permanent Fund, which manages another $28 billion.

    Concerns among lawmakers surround the effectiveness of divestment as a
    tactic, fearing that it will having little effect on the Sudanese
    government.

    State Rep. Peggy Wilson, R-Wrangell, worried that Alaska's divestment
    efforts might be easily avoided by companies doing business in Sudan.

    "They're going to get around it and do it anyway," she said, adding
    that she supports the intent, but feared unethical businesses know how
    to avoid such laws.

    "They dissolve one (limited liability company) and make another one
    and come in as another name," she said.

    Gara maintained that it would work, and it was important for the state
    to take any action it could.

    "We don't want to make money off genocide, we don't want money that's
    tainted," he said.

    The opponents don't dispute that, but doubt the usefulness of the
    bills.

    "It's just impossible for me to come up with a way to do what we want
    to do, which is divest from Darfur," said Rep. Carl Gatto, R-Palmer,
    often a Palin ally on other issues.

    Direct investments in Sudan are already against U.S. law, but the
    divestment effort aims to target foreign companies supporting Sudan's
    oil industry, such as PetroChina. Alaska holds about $14 million in
    stock in that company.

    The Sudanese military uses oil profits to fund its campaigns in
    Darfur.

    "There are a small handful of these companies operating in Sudan,"
    Gara said.


    State officials are developing cost estimates for
    divestment. Divestment supporters last year said estimates were
    unrealistically high, but state officials say the process of
    monitoring multiple money managers would be cumbersome.


    Exemptions in the bills would likely be made for mutual fund-type
    investments and stock index funds.

    "We want one of these bills to move forward, and frankly we don't care
    which one it is," Gara said.

    Lynn agreed, and several legislators said they all may choose to back
    the Palin bill.

    _juneauempire.com_ (mailto:[email protected])

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X