Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Media Allowed To Use Kurdish Language But Still Forbidden To Discuss

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Media Allowed To Use Kurdish Language But Still Forbidden To Discuss

    MEDIA ALLOWED TO USE KURDISH LANGUAGE BUT STILL FORBIDDEN TO DISCUSS KURDISH ISSUES FREELY

    AZG DAILY
    26-11-2009

    Turkey

    Reporters Without Borders hails the lifting of the last restrictions
    on the use of the Kurdish language by the Turkish news media. "This
    is an important and symbolically-charged step but its impact will
    be very limited as long as the media cannot tackle Kurdish issues
    without risking prosecution," the press freedom organisation said.

    The government gazette published a directive on 13 November
    indefinitely lifting all remaining restrictions on the broadcast
    media's use of minority languages. Use of Kurdish had been allowed in
    the print media and the national public TV station TRT 6 since January
    2004, but privately-owned radio stations were limited to five hours
    of Kurdish programming a week while privately-owned TV stations were
    limited to four hours.

    Furthermore, all Kurdish-language TV programmes had to be subtitled
    in Turkish, which made live broadcasts impossible. As a result, only
    TV stations offered any Kurdish programmes, the local station Gun TV
    and, in the past two months, the satellite TV station Su TV.

    "What is the point of broadcasting in Kurdish if coverage of Kurdish
    issues from an independent or activist viewpoint is banned in
    practice," Reporters Without Borders said. "The lifting of language
    restrictions must not be allowed to eclipse the fact that the media
    are still the victims of intimidation and self-censorship when they
    try to tackle sensitive issues."

    The press freedom organisation added: "There will be no real progress
    for free expression in Turkey until the repressive legislation has
    been repealed and the media are finally allowed to tackle the subjects
    that the Turkish state has declared off limits."

    More than 15 journalists are currently being prosecuted under
    Anti-Terrorist Law No. 3713 and criminal code article 216 (on inciting
    hatred) just for referring to the demands of the outlawed Kongra-Gel,
    also known as the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), or for quoting its
    leaders, even in an article that criticises them.

    The Turkish legislative arsenal - including criminal code article
    301, under which "insults to the Turkish nation" are punishable by
    up to two years in prison - imposes considerable restrictions on
    democratic debate by defining the limits that cannot be crossed as
    regards such subjects as the armed forces, police, judicial system,
    torture, secularism and the republic's founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

    And in practice this legislative arsenal allows many local judges
    and prosecutors to resist the government's declared policy of making
    Turkish society more open.

    Around 20 charges of "PKK propaganda," condoning criminal activity and
    membership of an illegal organisation have been brought against Vedat
    Kursun, the editor of the only Kurdish-language newspaper, Azadiya
    Welat. Although he has been detained since January, the first hearing
    in his trial was not held until 10 September. And he will continue to
    be detained until the next hearing, which has been set for 2 December.

    His lawyer, Servet Ozen, told Reporters Without Borders, "he is in
    prison for comments that his newspaper was the first to make, but
    which are now being debated in all the Turkish media."

    Pro-Kurdish publications are even silenced online. Access to the
    website of the daily newspaper Gunluk was blocked on 18 November.

    Gunluk itself, like the weekly Ozgur Ortam, has repeatedly been closed
    temporarily under the Anti-Terrorist Law, while Gunluk's owner, its
    editor and one of its journalists are all currently facing possible
    sentences of 7½ years in prison.

    The newspaper Demokratik Acilim was closed in September, just a
    few weeks after it had been launched to replace Gunluk, which was
    itself closed at the time. On 20 October, the European Court of
    Human Rights ordered the Turkish government to pay several hundred
    thousand euros in damages to 26 journalists working for four other
    pro-Kurdish newspapers that had been closed - Ulkede Ozgur Gundem,
    Gundem, Guncel and Gercek Demokrasi.

    Even media that show little sign of sympathising with Kurdish autonomy
    demands are exposed to repression. Hasan Cakkalkurt, the editor of the
    "Kemalist" daily Milliyet, and one of his journalists, Namik Durukan,
    are facing possible 7½-year jail sentences and fines of 9,000 euros
    for reprinting a local news agency interview with a PKK leader. The
    next hearing in their trial is set for 26 January.

    Hulya Avsar, a famous singer, and Milliyet journalist Devrim Sevimay
    are being prosecuted on charges of inciting hatred because Avsar,
    who has Turkish and Kurdish parents, said in an interview that the
    government's policy of openness should not "under-estimate or ignore
    the rights of the Kurds" and that it would be "hard to convince the
    terrorists of the separatist PKK to lay down their arms."

    Aside from Kurdish issues, it is still very difficult for Turkish
    journalists to criticise the behaviour of the judicial system, armed
    forces or police. Haci Bogatekin, the editor of the fortnightly Gerger
    Firat, was sentenced in absentia by a local court on 18 November to
    26 months and seven days in prison under criminal code article 125
    for allegedly libelling the former prosecutor and police chief of
    the southeastern district of Gerger by accusing them of harassing
    his newspaper and colluding with Islamists.

    Worn out by a legal battle that has dragged on for more than a year,
    Bogatekin did not attend the final hearing for health reasons. He
    wrote a letter of apology to the court, but the court ignored it on the
    grounds that it was not sent by recorded delivery, rsf.org reported.
Working...
X