Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Glendale ANC Voices Concern On Officers' Discrimination Suit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Glendale ANC Voices Concern On Officers' Discrimination Suit

    GLENDALE ANC VOICES CONCERN ON OFFICERS' DISCRIMINATION SUIT

    Asbarez
    Feb 3rd, 2010

    GLENDALE, CA-Leaders and activists from the Armenian National Committee
    of Glendale on Tuesday attended a session of the Glendale City
    council where they voiced concern over the city police department's
    discrimination and harassment of five Armenian police officers. Below
    is the statement they read to the five-person city council.

    On January 20, 2010, four current and one former sworn officers of
    the Glendale Police Department Filed a Federal Civil Rights lawsuit
    in Federal Court alleging Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation
    on the basis of National Origin and Ancestry. The allegations made in
    the complaint are both disturbing and appalling. Even if a fraction of
    these allegations in the complaint are established in a court of law,
    the City of Glendale has a long way to go on the way to becoming the
    city that we all envision and deserve.

    The Armenian National Committee of Glendale is gravely concerned about
    the statement made by the City Attorney, Mr. Scott Howard, immediately
    following the filing of the Complaint. According to the Glendale News
    Press article of January 25, 2010, City Attorney Scott Howard stated,
    "There are many allegations in the complaint, which are absolutely,
    utterly false." We would expect that the City Attorney's office at
    the very least, conduct a preliminary investigation before opining
    about the merits of serious allegations such as those contained in
    the complaint.

    The Glendale Police Department has a track record of lawsuits stemming
    from discrimination and improper conduct by its officers, many of
    which have resulted in settlements or jury verdicts against the City,
    and even punitive damages against individual police officers. The 2009
    jury verdict and $1.58 million judgment, including attorney fees,
    in the Ovasapian v. City of Glendale case, is the latest example in
    this now long list of cases resulting in adverse court decisions.

    The City's inability and unwillingness to conduct meaningful and
    objective investigations into the merits of such complaints and
    police misconduct in the past, have resulted in many millions of
    dollars which Glendale residents have been forced to bear.

    In fact, even after an adverse judgment in the Ovasapian case, the
    City Council, during public session, made a statement absolving the
    Police Officers and the Department of any wrong doing and assuming
    the $150,000 punitive damages award against the individual officers.

    Despite the finding of malice by the Federal Court and jury, the
    Glendale City Council released the following statement during its
    October 27, 2009 meeting "We recognize that this was a very unfortunate
    incident, however... we find that the officers acted in good faith,
    without actual malice and an apparent best interest of the city of
    Glendale." In effect, the City Council condoned the wrongful acts
    of these police officers. Not surprisingly, both officers are named
    defendants in the current law suit.

    In the months to come, the judicial process will be guided by a
    Federal District Court Judge and the outcome decided by a jury. In the
    meantime, It is very important that officials of the City of Glendale
    and the Glendale Police Department refrain from drawing conclusions
    about this lawsuit, until there is a full investigation and due
    process. It is also very important that as the judicial process runs
    its course, the police officers presenting these charges be shielded
    from any direct or indirect workplace harassment or retaliation. The
    Armenian National Committee of Glendale will be closely monitoring
    this case with the expectation that there will be full transparency
    in the investigation, and the confidence that the judicial system
    will reveal the facts and lead to an ultimate fair outcome.
Working...
X