Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genocide Recognition: Continuing a Flawed Political Strategy (Part I

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Genocide Recognition: Continuing a Flawed Political Strategy (Part I

    Genocide Recognition: Continuing a Flawed Political Strategy (Part I)

    http://www.armenianweekly.com/2011/01/13/genocide-recognition-continuing-a-flawed-political-strategy-part-i/
    Thu, Jan 13 2011


    By: Michael Mensoian


    I want to believe that every Armenian hopes for the day when the
    Turkish leadership acknowledges that the uprooting and murder of some
    1.5 million Armenians was a genocide.

    Good men and women, highly motivated and dedicated to Hai Tahd
    (Armenian Cause) and the best interests of the Armenian nation are
    working to achieve this objective. However, on Dec. 22 the latest
    fiasco in this annual drama occurred when the House democrat
    leadership in which our good men and women had placed their trust
    decided to fool the Armenian American community once again.
    Specifically, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrat Leadership
    simply decided, without warning, to pull the rug out from under the
    feet of the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) ostensibly
    because a favorable vote for passage of H.Res.252 (Armenian Genocide
    Resolution) was not likely. Behind the door machinations by the
    Turkish lobby aided by President Obama's refusal to act on his stated
    beliefs on the genocide are the usual suspects. Maybe this is the
    moment when the ARF/ANCA finally realizes that while this annual
    pilgrimage to Capitol Hill may capture the emotional support of the
    Armenian community, it represents an inefficient and ineffective use
    of resources.

    It was interesting to compare the response by the ANCA with the
    obsequiousness of the Armenian Assembly. Rightfully so, the ANCA
    conveyed the anger and disappointment of the Armenian American
    community, whereas the Armenian Assembly issued an immediate press
    release praising Pelosi and her leadership team for providing
    invaluable assistance and guidance during the process. The ANCA had
    every reason to believe that the vote would have been taken under the
    most favorable circumstances possible. An unconfirmed report
    attributed to the Assembly accepted Pelosi's judgment that the vote
    would not favor passage.

    If genocide recognition encompassed all that was represented by Hai
    Tahd, there would be no cause for concern. Or if genocide recognition
    could solve the problems facing the Armenian nation, there still would
    be no cause for concern. Unfortunately neither is so. The Turkish
    leaders in Ankara once again must be savoring their victory and it
    must cause thinking Armenians in the homeland (Armenia, Artsakh, and
    Javakhk) and the diaspora to question how priorities are being
    established and resources are being allocated. Difficult as it may be
    to accept, while passage of a genocide recognition resolution is
    important, it is not so important as to neglect other issues that have
    immediacy and are of greater importance to the future viability of the
    Armenian nation (see `Genocide Recognition: A Misguided Political
    Strategy,' the Armenian Weekly, Oct. 17, 2009).

    For a moment consider what effect passage of the non-binding H.Res.252
    could possibly have. Would it cause the Turkish leadership to recant
    and finally confess to the world and its own citizens, after a 90-year
    policy of denial, that a genocide did occur? Would the average Turkish
    citizen willingly accept the moral, economic, and political burden for
    the crimes some ancestors several generations removed may have
    committed? Would Turkey relent and open its border with Armenia? Would
    it result in Artsakh being recognized as an independent political
    entity? Would Georgia cease its discriminatory policies against the
    Armenians of Javakhk? Other questions could be asked, but the answers
    would all be a resounding no.

    Furthermore, passage of a resolution would not cause Turkey to implode
    for the benefit of Armenians and Hai Tahd. Genocide recognition by
    some two dozen foreign governments has not lessened Turkey's stature
    in the world. Presently it holds one of the rotating seats on the UN
    Security Council. Having said that, should a resolution recognizing
    the Armenian Genocide pass, it would only serve to harden the
    resistance of the Turkish leadership and the average Turkish citizen.
    And why not, when President Obama fails to honor his campaign rhetoric
    recognizing the Armenian Genocide? The president's need to cajole
    Ankara by equating its interests and values with those of the United
    States or elevating Turkey's contribution as more important than ever
    should be more than sufficient reason for the ARF/ANCA to reassess its
    strategy. In addition, many Armenians delude themselves by misreading
    what Turkish academics and others mean when they say that the Turkish
    people must face their past. Facing their past is a purely
    psycho-moral exercise that is unrelated to the political and economic
    ramifications that genocide recognition has for the Armenian people.

    Granted, a resolution recognizing the genocide would be an appropriate
    and significant moral and psychological victory for Armenians. It
    would go a long way in assuaging the emotional scars that Armenians
    have borne these many years, not only for the loss of ancestors they
    never had the opportunity to know, but for the generations forever
    lost to the Armenian nation. However, now is the time to realize that
    following the same flawed strategy year after year will invariably
    yield the same result. Valuable resources in political capital, money,
    individual commitment, and moral support from the Armenian community
    are being diverted from significantly more important objectives facing
    the Armenian nation. We need to look no further than Artsakh where
    some 7,000 of our people sacrificed their lives to liberate these
    historic Armenian lands. They are no less our martyrs than those whose
    lives were taken during the genocide.

    Myopia is a dangerous political affliction. It has allowed genocide
    recognition to be raised to the level of a cause celebre, an apparent
    moral obligation that is given precedence over every other issue.
    While genocide recognition may meet the legitimate expectations of the
    diasporan Armenians, the need to respond to issues whose solution will
    contribute to the viability and security interests of the Armenian
    nation are wanting. There is a failure to see the forest because of
    the trees. Theoretically, a genocide recognition strategy might be
    effective if a critical mass of countries (somewhere in the vicinity
    of 90 or 100 countries) not only supported the Armenian position, but
    also agreed to apply economic sanctions to pressure the Turkish
    leadership to finally accept responsibility. In the world of
    realpolitik this is an unrealistic expectation.

    Next week, Part II will consider the issues that are vital and
    immediate to Armenia's future, but that are being ignored, as well as
    an important opportunity for the ARF to expand its political base in
    Armenia.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X