Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ISTANBUL: Getting rid of a bandit state

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ISTANBUL: Getting rid of a bandit state

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Jan 3 2012


    Getting rid of a bandit state

    ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ


    The state has committed grave crimes in Turkey; in every case, it has
    also managed to involve society in these crimes.

    In order to achieve this, it has sometimes jointly committed these
    offenses, taking measures to ensure that the collaborators have
    benefited from the outcomes of the criminal acts. For instance, the
    offenses committed against non-Muslims in Turkey follow this pattern.
    Some groups have become rich by their crimes in Turkey.

    Another way the state involves society while committing these crimes
    is by ensuring that the people who talk about them feel guilty. One is
    given the impression that it would be a betrayal to the country to
    discuss state crimes.

    We should note that former Prime Minister Mesut Yılmaz said that the
    forest fires in Greece were plotted by the Turkish state. This
    statement raised fury in Greece but it is not discussed in Turkey --
    why? It is because we feel guilty. If we discuss this issue
    thoroughly, Turkey may face hardships and have to pay compensation.
    Besides, the fires were committed as a form of retaliation.

    The argument is that we punished Greece because they hosted PKK
    militants in their camps. However, Greece hosted these militants
    because of other crimes that Turkey had committed previously. Torture
    and mistreatment was widespread in Turkey in the 1990s. Villages were
    evacuated and burned down and people were abducted and executed. For
    this reason Turkey's requests for the extradition of the PKK militants
    were rejected by European states. And Greece, without fearing of
    international reaction or condemnation, was able to extend support to
    the PKK.

    In an attempt to address its poor human rights record, Turkey set fire
    to Greek forests. Now we are expected to ignore this fact just because
    it is possible that our country may be hurt.

    Is it not also the case with the Armenian issue? Do they not imply
    that Turkey would have to pay compensation and reparations if we
    thoroughly discuss the past? For this reason are we citizens not
    expected to remain silent about the problem? And it is for the same
    reason that those who seem to be open to discussing the Dersim
    massacre of 1938 prefer silence when it comes to the Armenian issue.
    Do they not accuse those who ask for an open discussion on the
    Armenian issue of siding with the Armenians?

    I personally believe that the cost of getting rid of the bandit state
    and creating a state governed by the rule of law is immeasurable. If
    we have to pay a big price on the road to becoming a state governed by
    the rule of law, I claim that we should pay that price. My family
    never benefited from the looting of non-Muslim properties. If I have
    committed a sin because I lived in a Greek house that we rented when I
    was little, may God forgive me and my family. If Turkey is ready to
    pay reparations, I am also ready to pay extra taxes to replace the
    money made by those who became rich when non-Muslim properties were
    looted.

    They are playing with our minds with different methods. They ask who
    should pay reparations to Muslims who were expelled from the Balkans.
    If Turkey is confident enough to compensate the non-Muslims it
    expelled or deported from this country, it should be able to help the
    Muslims who were expelled from the Balkans, in their cause to remedy
    the wrongs of the past.

    Because it cannot discuss its own injustices, Turkey is also unable to
    speak out about the injustices committed by others. And for this
    reason, it can only use the French genocide in Algeria as a trump
    card. Turkish politicians made reference to the genocide in Algeria
    just because the French mentioned the Armenian genocide; otherwise,
    they do not have a principled stance or claim to action on this
    matter.

    In recent years there have been some promising developments to get rid
    of this traditional approach. The most important one is undoubtedly
    the Ergenekon investigation, which focuses on the illegal activities
    of the deep state. However, this investigation did not turn into a
    process of purification, where serious human rights violations could
    be addressed. In addition this investigation also raised some
    redundant questions during the case. Second, contradictorily to the
    arguments of some, freedom of expression has been considerably
    expanded in Turkey. For instance, it would not have been possible for
    me to write some of the columns I have recently published in Turkish
    and English five years ago. The initial reaction and objection would
    have come from the newspapers owners and editors-in-chief. Even if
    they did publish my columns, I would have received thousands of death
    threats and I would have been prosecuted in court. The threats I
    received because of the columns I have written in recent times are
    negligible by Turkey's prevailing standards. In the past the media
    would have launched a witch hunt and a number of legal suits against
    me would have followed.

    All in all, there is a long way to travel. But it is impossible to
    ignore the fact that Turkey has made progress over the last decade.
    This is my assessment of last year.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X