Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Armenians Must Be Apostolic"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Armenians Must Be Apostolic"

    "ARMENIANS MUST BE APOSTOLIC"
    Siranuysh Papyan

    13:20 10/01/2013
    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/interview/view/28600

    Last year the ECtHR passed a judgment on the case Khachatryan and
    others v. Armenia, as a result 17 members of the organization of
    Jehovah's Witnesses will receive compensation for moral damage. In
    your opinion, what has this decision changed in the internal life
    and policy of Armenia?

    I think the decisions of the European institutions lead to very little
    change in our foreign and domestic policy. The European institutions
    use the authorities for propaganda and their answering steps have
    propaganda purposes. Perhaps there is some progress in this sphere
    but it is not irreversible. Those decisions would be essential if the
    Armenian elite adopted European values but it has a mostly anti-Western
    balance. Hence, violations of human rights will not end.

    The word sect is not a legal term, and the punishment provided for it
    is not set out in the law. Why do some countries, including Armenia,
    use this word and punish for it, including by court decisions?

    The countries all over the world are increasingly using religion
    for political ends, not only Islamic countries but also Christian
    countries. Armenia and Russia are examples. In the early 5th
    century Byzantium passed a law which equalized being a sect member
    to high treason. This theocratic principle is deeply planted in the
    consciousness of part of the Armenian elite. The principle of oligopoly
    works - monopoly against freedom. However, both political and religious
    persecution create an atmosphere of fear, which strengthens the elite.

    Everyone who criticizes the Apostolic church undergoes criticism. Do
    you think criticism splits the nation or are these backed by political
    interests?

    I also hear words of criticism but I get along with them. They
    are backed by some social perceptions, namely an Armenian must be
    apostolic, conservative, adore stewed cow legs and dolmades and so on.

    The key word in this sentence is must, which means there are invisible
    mechanisms of coercion, limitation of freedom. Diversity is considered
    a vice. This is barrack thinking.

    Under the two ex-presidents the Armenian Apostolic Church did not
    have such a huge role. The ruling party highlights religion both
    during the elections and when the president addresses international
    organizations. What is the reason? Are the president and his followers
    believers or are they using the church and faith?

    The RPA believes in conservative ideas, and religion has an important
    place among these values. However, religion has a limited role in
    their understanding - preach people obedience to the government. The
    church sets a good model because it never criticizes the government.

    Faith has no place. The Armenian Apostolic Church places loyalty
    to itself and to the public administration higher than faith. It is
    clear why the RPA commends the Church.

    There are people in Armenia who preach nationalism and their views
    are pagan. They claim that the Armenians did not use to be Christian
    by origin but do not undergo violence or encounter problems for their
    views. Does it mean that the followers of the Apostolic Church agree
    subconsciously with pagans?

    The Armenian word for pagan has the same root as the word ethnicity.

    Its first meaning is not tribe but place. Pagan is the worship of local
    gods. One cannot be Christian by origin, origin is from the pagan
    word stock. One becomes Christian due to spiritual transformation,
    conversion. The Armenian Apostolic Church has declared itself a
    national church which can be viewed as a deviation from orthodox
    faith. It also means that it has adopted a lot of local religious
    faiths which also can be viewed as a deviation from the Christian
    faith. As to right fundamentalists, including pagans, they undergo
    criticism by the left wing. Therefore, they are indulgent to them.

    In your opinion, to what extent does religion affect geopolitics? The
    EU decisions and behavior are those of a union of Christian countries.

    It is thought that the age of secularization has ended, and the age of
    desecularization has started, in other words, religion is increasingly
    having an important role in political, social and cultural sphere of
    life. The main reason was the collapse of the socialist camp. The new
    religious congregations occupy the place of left labor parties. They
    give the poor a feeling of hope and solidarity, fill in the existential
    gap, they bring meaning into their life.

    What role do atheists have in the world, in Armenia and in politics?

    Atheism had an important role in the past two centuries. Its success
    was due to the popularity of the scientific outlook. Now science does
    not bring outlook, it is a laboratory which supplies consumer goods
    to people. Modern capitalism does not encourage cognitive curiosity,
    hence the influence of science and other religious trends diminishes.

    In Armenia politics is highly nationalistic and conservative. Hence,
    the opposition of Armenia-based and foreign Armenian studies.

    Unfortunately, textbooks preach nationalism rather than objectivism.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X