Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Qandil Has Terms: Kurdish Rebel Leader Discusses Expectation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Qandil Has Terms: Kurdish Rebel Leader Discusses Expectation

    QANDIL HAS TERMS: KURDISH REBEL LEADER DISCUSSES EXPECTATIONS FROM PEACE PROCESS WITH TURKEY

    Taraf, Turkey
    June 1 2013

    Interview by Ceyda Karan with Murat Karayilan on Mt Qandil

    According to Murat Karayilan the most important condition for the
    Kurds to go along with the presidential system is democratization.

    We are in the Qandil Mountains in the region known as the "Medya
    Defense Areas." We are sounding out the region while the PKK [Kurdistan
    People's Congress, KGK] is leaving Turkey in groups.

    Accordingly, together with Kurd journalist colleagues Erdal Er and
    Gunay Aslan we got the opportunity to interview KCK [Assembly of
    Communities of Kurdistan] Executive Council Chairman Murat Karayilan.

    Under the shade of a huge walnut tree in the Qandil Mountains we
    discussed the withdrawal process, the conference for peace and
    democracy, what Karayilan calls "The New Turkey" as well as the
    campaign to have Abdullah Ocalan set free, the AKP's [Justice and
    Development Party] desires for a presidential system plus regional
    developments starting with Syria.

    Common Solution Project For All Component Parts

    Karayilan says: "The Kurd problem is Turkey's problem. All those people
    and circles in Turkey who feel responsible, who favor the peoples
    living together, who favor fraternity and the peoples having equal
    freedom need to consider the solution their duty. That is why our
    leadership suggested four conferences." However, he underscores that
    there is no manipulation on their part concerning the conferences:
    "That is not the case. The groups there, the forces included in the
    conference ran it on their own initiative." He believes the first
    conference "attained a certain level of response."

    "I think that as a first step it was a success, it was positive.

    However, it could have had more scope. It should be expanded and
    continued. For example, I think that by taking a second step it could
    have greater scope and could be an important effort that targets those
    groups that were unable to attend." He says that every group needs
    to clarify their proposals through discussion and come up with a text
    that can be called "the common solution project for all the component
    parts." He continues: "Perhaps at the top there is a process that
    is playing out as these forces clashing. Correct. However, the only
    real way to find a deep-rooted and lasting solution to this problem is
    through social accord. In other words, it is a problem that can only be
    fixed by the inclusion of all social forces with everyone contributing
    as much as they can, showing humility, developing empathy and with
    everybody making a real effort to fix this century-old problem."

    Wise Persons And Conference Not "Rivals"

    So, is there any "rivalry" between the planned conferences and the
    Wise Persons process that the government came up with to sell the
    solution process to the Turkish public? Karayilan said: "There could
    have been rivalry but really all those sides who genuinely favor a
    solution to the problem need to treat these conferences as positive."

    He adds: "Just as we find the Wise Persons activity to be lacking we
    nevertheless see it as something positive. Why? We thought it was
    going to have a much broader function, but it has been shaped with
    a very different format and it is operating differently. All the
    same, it is a good thing, we say. This is because they are trying
    to generate a mindset in favor of the solution. They are trying to
    convince people. This really is a good thing. All we are saying is
    that its scope could have been different. Actually, the other side
    should be thinking like that. So, this is a good activity. Now though,
    a process that includes all the forces of democracy in Turkey, the
    left-wing groups, the Alevi groups, other identities, the Armenians,
    the Assyrians, the Suryanis, in fact all the groups that have been
    kept out of the system until now, can of course develop much better.

    If the other side really is in favor of a solution it really should
    not ignore this."

    The AKP Wants To Do Everything Its Own Way

    Karayilan criticizes the AKP at this point: "The AKP seems to want to
    do everything its own way. It wants to drive everything itself under
    its own influence and its own supervision. If a problem has two sides
    to it then both sides needs to have the initiative. But while the
    AKP is trying to direct the process like this its approach is that of
    treating the other side as a back-up, and this is unacceptable. Nobody
    is anybody's back-up. They need to make it easier for all those
    components that need to play a role to be able to play that role."

    Emphasis On "New Turkey"

    Karayilan emphasizes the "New Turkey" saying: "If we really want to
    develop a process of social accord, we need to include all of this
    society's components like it or not, especially the left-wing ones,
    the social democrat groups and all those groups that have been kept
    out of the system and even harmed by it until now so that we can form
    a new Turkey. I mean, if we really are talking about forming a new
    Turkey what is this new Turkey going to be like? Is it going to take
    shape only with a handful of projects being run by the AKP in its
    line of thought? No. New Turkey is only possible with the powerful,
    initiative-taking and active participation of all social groups and
    the political will that speaks for them. Some people are saying the
    AKP is running the show so we should wait and see what the AKP is going
    to do. That approach is wrong. No. Everybody needs to be included and
    active and influential. I think that would be the correct approach."

    Gulen Community Should Come Along Too

    We ask who the other groups were whose participation was hoped for:
    "Does this include political Islamists, the Gulen Community and the
    business world?" Karayilan's answer was interesting: "Included of
    course, why not? They can come along. This problem is all of Turkey's
    problem, not just the problem of the left. This first formation in a
    way shaped the left's perspective. Common ground was formed. It can
    now grow and become broader. There could be effort to this end. For
    example, with a second step you could work to include even more diverse
    groups. This would produce an even more refined solution project,
    one that everybody could take charge of."

    On The Contrary, We Understand The Process Better Than Anyone

    We ask about the government's criticism of Karayilan in particular
    Yalcin Akdogan's comment of "he misunderstands the process." Karayilan
    appears reluctant to engage in polemics. He says he does not want to
    create more problems for the process. However, he does stress: if we
    really had misunderstood the process we would not be at this point
    now. I can say that he has got it all wrong, that we understand the
    process very well indeed and that we have tried to read the spirit
    of the times correctly."

    What The CHP And MHP Are Taking Advantage Of Karayilan finds fault
    with the way the CHP [Republican People's Party] is criticizing the
    government saying, "The process is not transparent." "The AKP has yet
    to present its own solution project. Actually, the process is more
    transparent than the previous one, more transparent than Oslo. But
    not entirely. The reason for this is that the AKP has not clearly
    presented the public with the government's or the state's perspective
    on a solution or its project. That is why some groups are asking what
    is going on. Furthermore, those who are opposed to the process are
    taking advantage of this and adopting an even more critical approach.

    In fact, some part of the CHP and the MHP [Nationalist Action Party]
    are exploiting this. Yet, if what is wanted is presented clearly there
    is nothing here that the Turkish people will be offended by. We are
    not talking about Turkey breaking up but about a project that will
    cements Turkey's voluntary and lasting unity. We think it is wrong
    to portray giving the Kurds their rights, which are universal and
    natural rights, as being an under-the-table deal. I mean, I think
    that should this be explained to the public in a more courageous
    fashion it would provide an answer to those types of criticism."

    Let Everything Be Discussed Openly

    We ask Karayilan about criticism to the effect that in Turkey the
    people learn about developments from him and not from the government:
    "We actually share our opinions with the public as much as our means
    will allow. There is nothing off limits for us but there is this:
    Let us say there is something that has been discussed and debated by
    both sides. We would naturally never fully disclose anything in a
    way that would disturb the other side. That would not be nice. But
    it is our wish that the projects be discussed openly. That is the
    right thing to do."

    Karayilan's New Turkey

    So, does the "New Turkey" that Karayilan talks about rest on the
    nation-state model? Karayilan first counts the Kurd problems and
    the democratization of Turkey as inseparable parts: "New Turkey
    should be a democratic country. It should a pluralist, egalitarian
    and libertarian country. We think that the Kurd problem can only be
    given a permanent solution on this basis. Turkey as a true democracy
    means a solution for the Kurd problem."

    Afterwards, he stresses self-rule and argues with the French example
    that the central state structures are weak now: "The world's first
    centrist nation-state was founded in France in 1789. After that, many
    countries took France as their example when carrying out bourgeois
    national democratic revolutions. Turkey also took France as its
    example. But for example when the President of France passed away what
    did Mitterand say? He said just as there was a need for centralization
    in the founding of France back then, so there is just as much need
    for decentralization in France's development today. And the island
    of Corsica today is almost exemplary. It has its own parliament and
    education in its own language. It has everything. This is happening
    in France."

    According to Karayilan, this means "being a model" and not "break-up."

    France is not breaking up. It is a country that is taken as a model. A
    model country for centralization, a single language, a single nation
    etc. Today, though, it is developing local governance because it is
    not possible for democratization to develop without first developing
    the approach and the understanding of local government and developing
    the means by which society can govern itself locally and be included.

    Furthermore, social life is so rich now that it is difficult to govern
    from a single center. This means that the economic structure that
    has taken shape, in particular the level of science and technology
    in this day and age, the improvements in the electro-technical field
    and in the field of telecommunication; all these things have effected
    radical changes in social life. Therefore, it has become difficult
    to govern even one village or town from a single center. There is a
    trend towards decentralization because people are seeing this."

    Presidential System Will Make Life Hard

    In his interview with veteran journalist Hasan Cemal, Karayilan
    said that the parliamentary system had already failed to introduce
    democracy and so there was no harm in debating the "presidential
    system." Reminding him that within the PKK there was a powerful
    leadership structure in which Ocalan was practically a "living legend,"
    we ask Karayilan whether or not "the way of thinking in Turkey was
    conducive to a presidential system in which all the mechanisms of
    democratic control would function fully, or whether it might lead to
    an authoritarian administration." Karayilan says: "For one thing,
    the problem is without doubt one of mindset. I mean, it is not
    possible to create a social superstructure without a change in the
    way of thinking." He says the KCK system was created to develop local
    administration not central. You can feel his concern at having his
    comments on the presidential system interpreted as them being ready to
    reach an agreement with the AKP. Karayilan says: "The Kurd problem is
    one that is forcing a solution in a very urgent fashion. We think that
    discussing the solution to this problem together with the question of
    whether the system in Turkey should be parliamentary or presidential
    all within the same context might create further problems. That is
    not our preference. But while Turkey is being restructured it is best
    not to look out of one window only. I mean, you need to discuss the
    alternatives. That is what we meant by saying, 'We are not necessarily
    opposed to a presidential system.' What we are in favor of actually
    is this: The Kurd problem needs to be treated separately. That is true.

    Turkey's system problem needs to be discussed within the context of
    democratization. But placing them both in the same basket and making
    that basket heavier might make it harder to achieve a solution. That
    is what worries us."

    Opposed To Turkish-Style Presidency

    According to Karayilan, the Kurds have some terms for accepting a
    "presidential system": "What matters to us is democratization. I mean,
    under any Turkish-style or Middle East-style presidential system in
    which just one group has any say; there is no way such a system can
    bring democracy or Turkey or be any use at all. We would never go
    along with it. We are saying it would be correct to look for a system
    that will bring democracy to Turkey and that if really has legal
    underpinnings and local government and if initiatives are shared; if
    it will bring maturity to the foundation for democratization and not
    a tyrant, then yes it can be debated. In this respect, we are saying
    that too much debate and putting this ahead of everything else will
    cause a log-jam. Our proposal: do not lead with this."

    What Does Second Stage Expect?

    Karayilan boasts that they have fulfilled to a significant degree their
    responsibilities for the solution and that they will continue to do
    so. "Look, there is the ceasefire, the release of captive soldiers,
    and the most important decision of all, to decide to withdraw and put
    that decision into practice. In this respect, a huge distance has been
    covered in terms of developing the climate for democratic debate and
    preparing the grounds needed for new steps to be taken. This first
    stage is coming to an end particularly with the fast current that is
    going to take place in the month ahead. It is over, really." According
    to Karayilan, the second stage needs to begin already: "The second
    stage is all about the legal and constitutional topics pertaining to
    fixing the Kurd problem. As a result, it is a period where the state
    and the government need to do more of what needs to be done. We have
    said this on many occasions. We expect this. We now expect the steps
    that need to be taken to be put on the agenda."

    First Expectations Of Second Stage: The release Of prisoners, The
    KCK Trials

    We ask Karayilan about his expectations of the "second stage," which
    he says will begin next month. "The ball is now in the government's
    court. There are things that need to be done first. The government
    is forcing itself to wait, but for what we cannot say. There was that
    trip the United States and back. Most recently there was that period
    of trying to determine or direct developments in the region." He
    says that before the constitution is changed there needs to be an
    "annual clean up" and that the government has no more excuses left
    not to take the democratization steps that it is going to take. He
    lists his expectations.

    He talks about the inmates in prison who have contracted fatal
    illnesses: "They number in their dozens. I do not know for sure, but
    close to 100. Normally, in any democratic and humanist county they
    would be released because they are near the end of their lives or
    they cannot make it under prison conditions. There have been times in
    Turkey when sick prisoners are released on presidential orders. But
    some sick prisoners are not released because they are Kurds. There
    is discrimination. This discrimination needs to be over now. People
    are dying in prison because they are Kurds. So, I think these kinds
    of humanitarian steps ought to have been proposed by now."

    One other expectation the PKK has is for the trials relating to the
    KCK remand prisoners to be dropped: "Again, a process has begun that
    will take guns out of the equation entirely in the Kurd problem. This
    was started by Leader Apo [Ocalan] and we are committed to seeing it
    through. What happens then? Politics happens. Should that not require
    politicians in prison to be released? Everybody knows that none of the
    KCK prisoners have done anything illegal in their lives, not so much
    as carry a knife. They are only inside because they were in politics.

    Examples like this could have been a road cleaning. Again, at the heart
    of the, in inverted commas, Counterterrorism Law is martial law in
    Kurdistan. It is legislation for martial law. So, seeing that we want
    to launch a new era should this not be done away with? It should be,
    of course. The government could do this without breaking a sweat.

    If it were to do this, this would give us confidence and give our
    society confidence too. We would take even more courageous steps."

    Tomorrow: "Let Nobody Think we are Lowering our Sails"

    [Translated from Turkish]

Working...
X