Tweet
Armenian Assembly of America News
1334 G Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (202) 393-3434
Fax: (202) 638-4904
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://armenianassembly.tumblr.com/
The Murder of Memory
By Samantha Testa
April 30, 2014
This time next year will mark the 100 year anniversary of the death of 1.5
million Armenians during the genocide that began in 1915. To this day,
however, Turkey has gone to great lengths to deny that genocide occurred
and that denial is coming at a high cost. This denial has created ongoing
tension not only between Turkey and Armenia, but between Turkey and other
nations as well.
The Armenians cannot move on from their past until they feel
they have been given the recognition they deserve. ``History' declared
Turkish writer Sechuk Tezgul, `is waiting for that honest Turkish leader...
who will apologize to the Armenian
people...''[i]An
apology for genocide may be hard to make, but it is necessary. It
enables Turkish society to question why this happened and to avoid doing it
again in the future.
Turkey has gone to great lengths to cover up evidence that they intentionally
killed the Armenians. Turkish author, Orhan Pamuk, was charged by law
enforcement for referring to what happened to the Armenians as genocide.
Pamuk was charged under the Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which
states that anyone who denigrates Turkishness is a criminal. This law,
which helps cover up the genocide, is a violation of human rights in the
eyes of the European Union (EU). Essentially, Article 301 and the Turkish
government's use of it to stifle discussion of the Armenian Genocide is
costing Turkey a place in the EU.
Genocide denial is costing Turkey a lot more than just the EU, it is
keeping alive hostile feelings between Armenians and Turks. In 2007, a
Turkish citizen of Armenian ancestry who worked as the editor-in-chief of a
Turkish-Armenian magazine, Hrant Dink, was murdered. Just two years prior
to his death, Dink was arrested and charged under Article 301 for openly
discussing the Armenian genocide. When he turned up dead shortly
thereafter, it was not hard for people to deduce that his death was related
to his statements about the
genocide.[ii]The
government may not have physically executed his death, but they did
inspire the act that killed him. The law promotes Turkish nationalism, so
it is no surprise that a patriotic Turk came forward and murdered an
Armenian for speaking out against Turkey.
Turkey has not only internal problems, but international ones as well. In
2007, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee passed a bill that would
formally recognize the events from 1914-1918 as genocide. Turkey's
immediate response was to withdraw their ambassador and to threaten to deny
the U.S. access to the NATO airbase in Turkey. At the time the U.S. was
heavily involved in that area of the world, so efforts to bring the bill to
the House floor for a vote were suspended due to pressure put on the U.S.
by Turkey.[iii]
Genocide denial is also dangerous because it puts Turkey in the position to
commit genocide again. `Studies ... prove that the single best predictor of
future genocide is denial of a past genocide coupled with impunity for its
perpetrators... Genocide deniers are three times more likely to commit
genocide again.'[iv]Who
is to say they will not go after the Armenians or the Kurds, like they
have in the past?
Turkey claims that what happened to Armenians occurred in the context of
war. For a mass killing to be defined genocide the intent to exterminate
the race or group in one way or another must be there and Turkey claims
that this was not their intent. They were simply acting in self-defense.
However, numerous scholars and other historians have found overwhelming
evidence that what the Turkish government did was premeditated and not out
of defense, but out of desire to exterminate the Armenian people. Is the
nature of war so different that it becomes acceptable to intentionally
murder over one million innocent men, women and children? Today, many Turks
believe that this is the case and that is why they did not commit genocide.
According to Jay Winter, war and genocide very much go hand in hand. Thus,
Turkey's `cover of war' argument cannot stand. =80=9C... A substantial part of a
long-established and prosperous civilian community with identifiable
religious and cultural beliefs had been wiped out; these people were
sentenced to death because of who they
were.'[v]That
is the nature of genocide, the extermination of an entire race. The
Turkish government nearly wiped the Armenians and their culture completely
off the planet, and that was no accident. That is not necessary to win a
war, not ever.
After all this time, Armenia still wants to mend its relationship with
Turkey. They will never be able to form a real relationship with Turkey,
however, until Turkey gives them the recognition they deserve. The Armenian
people need closure, they need peace, and most importantly they need to
know that this will never happen again.
As mentioned before, a leader can come to power in Turkey who will admit
what his ancestors did and attempt to create a healthy relationship with
Armenia. Another possible solution is that other world powers could put
pressure on Turkey to admit to the genocide, because it is the right thing
to do. When U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau was in Turkey during the
genocide he spoke with leader Talaat Pasha. Talaat asked him, `Why
are you
so interested in the Armenians anyway? You are a Jew, these people are
Christians..' to which Morgenthau replied: `You don't seem to realize that
I am not here as a Jew but as the American Ambassador.....I do not appeal to
you in the name of any race or religion, but merely as a human
being..'[vi]This
life should not be about politics, it should be about the shared human
experience. Air space and naval bases should not be more important than
human rights. Once the world believes this, the Armenians will get the
justice they deserve.
Samantha Testa is a Sophomore at Villanova University School of Business
in Villanova, Pennsylvania. This article is summarized from an academic
paper that was submitted for the course `The Nature of Genocide.'
------------------------------
[i]
Jones,
Adam. Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.
115. Print.
[ii]
"Turkish-Armenian
Writer Shot Dead." BBC News. BBC, 19 Jan. 2007. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
[iii]
"Turkey
Recalls Ambassador to U.S. Over Armenian Genocide Bill." Fox News. FOX
News Network, 11 Oct. 2007. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
[iv]
Stanton,
Gregory. "The Cost of Denial." Genocide Watch. Genocide Watch, n.d. Web.
18 Apr. 2014.
[v]
Winter,
Jay. "Under Cover of War." The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in
Historical Perspective. By Robert Gellately and Ben Kiernan. New York:
Cambridge UP, 2003. 189-213. Print.
[vi]
Morgenthau,
Henry. Ambassador Morgenthau's Story. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page,
1918. 333-34. Print.
Available online at: http://bit.ly/1fR4v5R
1334 G Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (202) 393-3434
Fax: (202) 638-4904
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://armenianassembly.tumblr.com/
The Murder of Memory
By Samantha Testa
April 30, 2014
This time next year will mark the 100 year anniversary of the death of 1.5
million Armenians during the genocide that began in 1915. To this day,
however, Turkey has gone to great lengths to deny that genocide occurred
and that denial is coming at a high cost. This denial has created ongoing
tension not only between Turkey and Armenia, but between Turkey and other
nations as well.
The Armenians cannot move on from their past until they feel
they have been given the recognition they deserve. ``History' declared
Turkish writer Sechuk Tezgul, `is waiting for that honest Turkish leader...
who will apologize to the Armenian
people...''[i]An
apology for genocide may be hard to make, but it is necessary. It
enables Turkish society to question why this happened and to avoid doing it
again in the future.
Turkey has gone to great lengths to cover up evidence that they intentionally
killed the Armenians. Turkish author, Orhan Pamuk, was charged by law
enforcement for referring to what happened to the Armenians as genocide.
Pamuk was charged under the Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which
states that anyone who denigrates Turkishness is a criminal. This law,
which helps cover up the genocide, is a violation of human rights in the
eyes of the European Union (EU). Essentially, Article 301 and the Turkish
government's use of it to stifle discussion of the Armenian Genocide is
costing Turkey a place in the EU.
Genocide denial is costing Turkey a lot more than just the EU, it is
keeping alive hostile feelings between Armenians and Turks. In 2007, a
Turkish citizen of Armenian ancestry who worked as the editor-in-chief of a
Turkish-Armenian magazine, Hrant Dink, was murdered. Just two years prior
to his death, Dink was arrested and charged under Article 301 for openly
discussing the Armenian genocide. When he turned up dead shortly
thereafter, it was not hard for people to deduce that his death was related
to his statements about the
genocide.[ii]The
government may not have physically executed his death, but they did
inspire the act that killed him. The law promotes Turkish nationalism, so
it is no surprise that a patriotic Turk came forward and murdered an
Armenian for speaking out against Turkey.
Turkey has not only internal problems, but international ones as well. In
2007, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee passed a bill that would
formally recognize the events from 1914-1918 as genocide. Turkey's
immediate response was to withdraw their ambassador and to threaten to deny
the U.S. access to the NATO airbase in Turkey. At the time the U.S. was
heavily involved in that area of the world, so efforts to bring the bill to
the House floor for a vote were suspended due to pressure put on the U.S.
by Turkey.[iii]
Genocide denial is also dangerous because it puts Turkey in the position to
commit genocide again. `Studies ... prove that the single best predictor of
future genocide is denial of a past genocide coupled with impunity for its
perpetrators... Genocide deniers are three times more likely to commit
genocide again.'[iv]Who
is to say they will not go after the Armenians or the Kurds, like they
have in the past?
Turkey claims that what happened to Armenians occurred in the context of
war. For a mass killing to be defined genocide the intent to exterminate
the race or group in one way or another must be there and Turkey claims
that this was not their intent. They were simply acting in self-defense.
However, numerous scholars and other historians have found overwhelming
evidence that what the Turkish government did was premeditated and not out
of defense, but out of desire to exterminate the Armenian people. Is the
nature of war so different that it becomes acceptable to intentionally
murder over one million innocent men, women and children? Today, many Turks
believe that this is the case and that is why they did not commit genocide.
According to Jay Winter, war and genocide very much go hand in hand. Thus,
Turkey's `cover of war' argument cannot stand. =80=9C... A substantial part of a
long-established and prosperous civilian community with identifiable
religious and cultural beliefs had been wiped out; these people were
sentenced to death because of who they
were.'[v]That
is the nature of genocide, the extermination of an entire race. The
Turkish government nearly wiped the Armenians and their culture completely
off the planet, and that was no accident. That is not necessary to win a
war, not ever.
After all this time, Armenia still wants to mend its relationship with
Turkey. They will never be able to form a real relationship with Turkey,
however, until Turkey gives them the recognition they deserve. The Armenian
people need closure, they need peace, and most importantly they need to
know that this will never happen again.
As mentioned before, a leader can come to power in Turkey who will admit
what his ancestors did and attempt to create a healthy relationship with
Armenia. Another possible solution is that other world powers could put
pressure on Turkey to admit to the genocide, because it is the right thing
to do. When U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau was in Turkey during the
genocide he spoke with leader Talaat Pasha. Talaat asked him, `Why
are you
so interested in the Armenians anyway? You are a Jew, these people are
Christians..' to which Morgenthau replied: `You don't seem to realize that
I am not here as a Jew but as the American Ambassador.....I do not appeal to
you in the name of any race or religion, but merely as a human
being..'[vi]This
life should not be about politics, it should be about the shared human
experience. Air space and naval bases should not be more important than
human rights. Once the world believes this, the Armenians will get the
justice they deserve.
Samantha Testa is a Sophomore at Villanova University School of Business
in Villanova, Pennsylvania. This article is summarized from an academic
paper that was submitted for the course `The Nature of Genocide.'
------------------------------
[i]
Jones,
Adam. Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.
115. Print.
[ii]
"Turkish-Armenian
Writer Shot Dead." BBC News. BBC, 19 Jan. 2007. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
[iii]
"Turkey
Recalls Ambassador to U.S. Over Armenian Genocide Bill." Fox News. FOX
News Network, 11 Oct. 2007. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
[iv]
Stanton,
Gregory. "The Cost of Denial." Genocide Watch. Genocide Watch, n.d. Web.
18 Apr. 2014.
[v]
Winter,
Jay. "Under Cover of War." The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in
Historical Perspective. By Robert Gellately and Ben Kiernan. New York:
Cambridge UP, 2003. 189-213. Print.
[vi]
Morgenthau,
Henry. Ambassador Morgenthau's Story. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page,
1918. 333-34. Print.
Available online at: http://bit.ly/1fR4v5R