No announcement yet.

Profile of next US ambassador to Armenia - news agency

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Profile of next US ambassador to Armenia - news agency

    Profile of next US ambassador to Armenia - news agency

    Mediamax news agency, Yerevan
    10 May 04

    Prior to his taking up the appointment as US Ambassador to Armenia,
    John Evans is profiled as a diplomat experienced in Russian and NATO
    affairs but the news agency questions his ability in dealing with
    a previous regional conflict. It notes that he was one of the first
    diplomats to chart Vladimir Putin's rise. Following are excerpts from
    a report by the Armenian news agency Mediamax; subheadings inserted

    On 6 May, the President of the United States George Bush nominated
    to the Senate the candidacy of the new US Ambassador Extraordinary
    and Plenipotentiary to Armenia - Director of the State Department's
    Office of Russian Affairs, John Marshall Evans. Despite the fact that
    Evans's official appointment, most likely, will take place in several
    months we decided to present some facts from his biography.

    Previous posts

    John Evans is a graduate of Yale College and Columbia University. He
    has served in US diplomatic missions in Iran (1971-74), Czechoslovakia
    (1975-78), the Soviet Union (Moscow, 1981-83), at NATO Headquarters,
    1983-86). In the State Department, he has served as a special assistant
    to Secretaries Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie in different years.

    In the mid-nineties, John Evans John Evans held the posts of Deputy
    Head of the US Diplomatic Mission in Czech Republic and US Consul
    General in Saint Petersburg. In 1997-1999, he headed the OSCE Mission
    to Moldova. After returning to Washington, John Evans became Director
    of the Office of Analysis for Russia and Eurasia in the Bureau of
    Intelligence and Research. For the last few years John Evans has been
    Director of the State Department's Office of Russian Affairs. The
    diplomat's spouse, Donna Evans, is the executive director of the
    World Affairs Council in Washington [D.C.]

    Judging by the record of service, John Evans is a more experienced
    diplomat than the current US Ambassador to Armenia John Ordway, who
    will soon head the US diplomatic mission in Kazakhstan. At the same
    time, if we compare the biographies of the two diplomats it becomes
    clear that they have much in common - Ordway, like Evans worked in the
    US diplomatic missions in Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union and NATO,
    and before his appointment for the post of US Ambassador to Armenia
    he was Deputy Head of the US Diplomatic Mission in Moscow.

    Ambassadors with a "Russian past"

    Yerevan's opposition newspaper Haykakan Zhamanak [Armenian Times]
    asserts that Washington sends ambassadors with a "Russian past"
    to Yerevan as it "considers Armenia to be Russia's vassal."

    "The fact that a diplomat specialized in Russia will take the post
    of the US ambassador to Armenia testifies to the fact that Armenia
    is perceived not as a separate geopolitical unit but as Russia's
    vassal. In order to work in Armenia the foreign diplomats should be
    familiar with Russia," Haykakan Zhamanak wrote on 6 May.

    We can agree with the newspaper's one opinion only - the US Ambassador
    to Armenia should really be familiar with Russia. But this does not
    mean that by appointing John Evans the United States "gave up on
    Armenia" which they think to be "Russia's patrimony."

    In our opinion the appointment of John Evans, on the contrary,
    proves the United States' growing interest towards Armenia. For the
    last two years, Armenia and the USA have moved forward considerably
    in their relations. The military cooperation between the two states,
    which seemed unreal several years ago, has not only become a reality
    but is also developing consecutively. Armenia-NATO relations,
    the main inspirer of which is the United States, also develop
    intensively. Armenia has already stated its intention to sign
    Individual Partnership Action Plan with NATO, and the Alliance's
    leadership does not hide that NATO's policy in relation to the South
    Caucasus will be formulated and voiced at the forthcoming NATO Summit
    in Istanbul in June.

    Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
    Ambassador Elizabeth Jones said in mid- April [2004] that "Armenia has
    taken big steps to enhance its security relationship with the United
    States and NATO in the past six months". "We have strongly encouraged
    the Armenian government to permit closer military cooperation with the
    US and look forward to a positive response from Yerevan," Jones said.

    Thus, there is every reason to suppose that one of the priority
    directions in John Evans's work will become the development of
    US-Armenian military cooperation and the provision of further close
    relations between Armenia and NATO. It is natural that the diplomat
    will need his acquaintance with Russia while solving these questions.

    Early familiarity with Vladimir Putin

    An interesting nuance - John Evans is one of those few American
    diplomats who was personally familiar with Vladimir Putin at the time
    when few people could have expected the former KGB Colonel to become
    President of the Russian Federation. Putin and Evans got acquainted
    in Saint Petersburg: Russia's future President was Deputy Mayor at
    that time and was in charge of foreign economic ties, and the future
    US Ambassador to Armenia was Consul General of the United States in
    Saint Petersburg.

    Delivering a lecture on the situation in Russia in Mississippi
    University in February 2002, John Evans said that he attentively
    followed Putin's career. Speaking about Russian leader's policy, he
    noted that Putin subordinated Russian Foreign Policy to economic goals
    and for that reason he was tilting more to the West than to the East,
    especially after 11 September 2001.

    However, Evans's favourable attitude towards Vladimir Putin did
    not prevent him from making a number of harsh-worded statements in
    relation to Russia in the autumn of 2002, the reason of which was the
    flight of Russian military planes over Georgia's territory. Evans's
    statement could hardly be called diplomatic: "we have some doubts
    that the Russian highest civil government controls its armed forces."

    John Evans also said: "Due to the opportunities of collecting
    information created by the USA during the Cold War, Washington at
    once learned what happened to Kursk submarine on 12 August [2000]
    and we immediately shared this information with the Russian side
    but your military leadership did not disclose the truth for two
    years." "Part of Russian high military officialdom continuously lies
    to the country's leadership," he said.

    Solving conflicts

    On the post of the US ambassador to Armenia, John Evans will have to
    engage in solving the Nagorno Karabakh conflict as well. As at the
    end of the nineties he headed the OSCE mission to Moldova, which was
    actively involved in settling the conflict in the Dniester region,
    we can assume that Evans possesses certain experience in this sphere.

    Despite the fact that Evans left Moldova in 1999 he did not set aside
    the Dniester region conflict. In any case, he discussed the Dniester
    region conflict with the Chairman of International Committee of the
    Federation Council Mikhail Margelov last November. Evans said in
    particular that the memorandum suggested by Russia for settling the
    situation in the Dniester region and the fact that both Moldova and
    the region spoke for its adoption "gives hope for an earlier peaceful
    settlement of the problems in the region."

    In spite of the fact that after this statement by John Evans the
    Russian newspapers published articles headed "The USA approve of
    the Russian plan" several days later the Russian initiative failed
    as official Kishinev refused to sign the document suggested by
    Russia, which had already been coordinated with Dniester region
    authorities. Moscow was so irritated that Russian Foreign Minister
    Igor Ivanov openly accused the United States, which was not informed
    about the coming signing of the peace plan, for the failure of the
    Russian peace initiative. Nobody explained the reason that made John
    Evans support the Russian peace initiative several days before.

    We can only hope that such "incidents" will not happen in the process
    of Nagorno Karabakh settlement, the fate of which depends of Russia
    and USA's coordinated actions in many respects.