Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Threat of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation from Turkey

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Threat of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation from Turkey

    http://www.cnp.ca/issues/turkey-nuclear-background .html

    Nuclear Awareness Project
    Media Backgrounder
    June 1998

    [email protected]

    The Threat of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation from Turkey
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    The dark underside of nuclear power has always been its potential for
    nuclear weapons proliferation, either through the reprocessing of spent fuel
    to produce plutonium - - an inevitable byproduct of reactor operation - - or
    through the transfer of sensitive nuclear information, technology and
    materials.

    Canadian nuclear cooperation with India and Pakistan provides a chilling
    example of how the transfer of so-called "civilian" nuclear technology can
    contribute directly and indirectly to the development of nuclear weapons.
    Canada provided the technology at the foundation of the Indian and Pakistani
    nuclear programs and continues to provide vital information and assistance
    to maintain those programs through the CANDU Owners Group (COG).

    The Turkish Electricity Generation and Transmission Company (TEAS - - a
    state-owned utility) is expected to soon make a long-awaited announcement
    about the winner of a bidding process to build a nuclear power station at
    Akkuyu Bay on the Mediterranean. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) is
    bidding to sell two 700 MW CANDU reactors to Turkey at a cost of about $4
    billion (CDN). It is bidding against a German/French consortium (Nuclear
    Power International - NPI - is a cooperative venture between Siemens/KWU and
    the French national nuclear company Framatome). The third consortium bidding
    is a partnership of Westinghouse and Mitsubishi.

    Three items providing background on the possible nuclear weapons
    proliferation threat from nuclear power development in Turkey follow.

    The first item is an article from the Turkish daily newspaper "Radical" on
    June 1, 1998. The article is entitled Pakistan's offer for cooperation.
    Radical is a major daily paper of an intellectual nature (it is NOT
    particularly left-wing, as the name might suggest). We have investigated the
    report and have confidence in its reliability. The reported offer from
    Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to Turkish President Suleyman Demirel
    took place on May 11, 1998 - - the day after India exploded its first three
    nuclear bombs on May 10.

    The second item is a report on a former Turkish NATO General making a thinly
    veiled statement in support of a nuclear weapons program for Turkey. This
    report indicates that there is at least some support in the Turkish military
    for nuclear weapons development. Although Turkey is a nominal democracy,
    nobody has any doubts that the military really runs the country. For
    example, it was the military that forced the government of Necmettin Erbakan
    to step down in June 1997, and replaced it with the government of Mesut
    Yilmaz.

    The third item is an excerpt from a report called "The CANDU Syndrome" that
    I wrote in 1997. It provides some historical background with evidence of
    Turkey being used to ship nuclear weapons technology to Pakistan; and an
    attempt to purchase a reactor from Argentina, likely for plutonium
    production. The purchase was stopped by pressure from the USA.

    It is very likely that nuclear-armed confrontation is in the future of the
    middle east if nuclear development is allowed to continue unchecked. Israel
    already has a well developed nuclear weapons program. Iran has two reactors
    under construction by the German company KWU, with two more to be built
    there by China. Iraq's nuclear program was destroyed only during the Gulf
    War.

    For more information, please refer to "The CANDU Syndrome" on www.ccnr.org,
    or www.cnp.ca, or contact:

    Dave Martin
    Nuclear Awareness Project
    Box 104
    Uxbridge, Ontario
    Canada
    L9P 1M6

    tel/fax 905-852-0571
    E-mail: [email protected]



    --------------------------------------------------------------


    1.
    Radical
    June 1, 1998

    Pakistan's offer for cooperation

    It is declared that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has offered Turkey
    cooperation for Nuclear Weapons. Being surrounded by countries with nuclear
    programs pushes Turkey to take the necessary measures even while it
    continues disarmament efforts.

    By Deniz Zeyrek

    Ankara -- India and Pakistan's nuclear tests, which sparked international
    opposition, have resulted in action in Turkey, which is surrounded by
    countries with nuclear programs, including Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel, and
    the former USSR. Turkey is anxious about the latest developments. On the
    other hand, according to the information received, Pakistan Prime Minister
    Nawaz Sharif has said to Turkey `Let's work together on nuclear weapons'. It
    is reported that Nawaz Sharif made this offer personally to [Turkish]
    President Suleyman Demirel and to the Minister with him.

    According to the information we received, during the May 11-12 Economic
    Cooperation Organisation (ECO) Summit at Almati, Kazakhstan, President
    Suleyman Demirel met with Nawaz Sharif. During the discussions Demirel put
    the India-Pakistan conflict onto the agenda. Nawaz Sharif explained that a
    large part of the conflict was caused by India's nuclear tests, and said
    that Pakistan is also conducting nuclear research for defense purposes.

    Foreign threats

    Border disagreements between Pakistan and India, and their declaration of
    themselves as nuclear states, prompted Turkey to put nuclear weapons on the
    agenda as a national security issue. The record of Turkey's neighbours on
    nuclear and chemical weapons, also led Ankara to undertake an initiative in
    this direction. One cabinet member spoke about the anxiety of Turkey because
    of the danger with which it is confronted, and said: "We must also acquire
    these technologies in the next ten years. The necessary investments are
    unavoidable."

    Because the efforts of the UN Security Council and the international
    campaign for the reduction of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons could
    fail, Turkey's defense plans were put onto the political agenda of the
    Government. Some of the members of the government continue to insist that
    these initiatives should be taken, and they defend the use of nuclear
    technology for military purposes. Ankara, however, is demanding that a
    "regional forum" should be constituted and that nuclear and chemical weapons
    should be removed from the arsenals of countries in the region. [Turkish]
    Foreign Minister Ismail Cem forwarded this proposal to all countries of the
    region except Israel. Turkey also continues efforts for conventional
    disarmament and is trying to revive the Agreement for the Reduction of
    European Conventional Forces. However, the lack of response >from countries
    in the region, and the failure of disarmament efforts, leads Turkey to take
    the necessary measures.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    2.
    On May 18, 1998, the Turkish TV news channel NTV re-broadcast a program
    called "Pasaport" which was originally broadcast from Ankara on May 17,
    interviewing the retired Turkish Lieutenant-General Erdogan Oznal, who was
    formerly in charge of the Balikesir Nato Air Base. He was responsible for
    NATO fighter/bomber aircraft in Turkey armed with nuclear warheads during
    the cold-war.

    The moderator reported on the recent nuclear weapons tests in India and
    Pakistan, and asked the General what his feelings were while he was in
    charge at the Balekesir Base, waiting for a possible command to launch and
    fire nuclear weapons. He spoke cooly about waiting over the years for the
    possible command.

    General Oznal described the nuclear threats around Turkey's borders, such as
    Israel and Iran, which have their own nuclear programs. General Oznal
    repeatedly emphasized the nuclear threat from Israel, India, Pakistan and
    Iran, and said: "TURKEY MUST NOW DEVELOP ITS OWN NUCLEAR POLICY". It is
    clear that Oznal was referring to the development of a nuclear weapons
    program.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    3.
    Turkey and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation

    This is an excerpt from "The CANDU Syndrome: Canada's Bid to Export Nuclear
    Reactors to Turkey", by David H. Martin, September 1997. The entire report
    is posted on the web page of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear
    Responsibility, www.ccnr.org

    Turkey ratified the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
    on April 17, 1980, and the safeguards agreement went into force on September
    1, 1981.[1] At the controversial "Extension Conference" of the NPT in April
    1995, the five nuclear weapons states sought, and despite strong opposition,
    obtained indefinite extension of the treaty. Turkey demonstrated its loyalty
    to the international nuclear status quo by supporting the "indefinite and
    unconditional extension" of the treaty.[2]

    Despite Turkey's observation of the non-proliferation proprieties, there
    have been past concerns about alleged nuclear proliferation connections with
    Pakistan. Signing the NPT does not necessarily mean much. Article X of the
    NPT allows any party to withdraw with only three months notice if
    "extraordinary events... have jeopardized the supreme interests of its
    country".[3] Alternately, states such as Iraq and the Peoples Republic of
    China have simply ignored the strictures of the Treaty, despite their
    continued adherence. Pakistan has actively pursued nuclear weapons
    capability for many years, and has refused to sign the NPT. Pakistan is in
    an unofficial sub-continental nuclear arms race with India - and both
    countries are considered undeclared nuclear weapons states. Connections with
    such states may have serious implications - Chinese nuclear dealings with
    Pakistan have been the main cause of an American nuclear trade boycott of
    China.

    The first allegation of a Turkey/Pakistan nuclear connection was in 1981.
    The current Turkish ambassador to Canada, Omer Ersun (then Chief of Policy
    Planning at the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the military
    junta) has confirmed that the US administration protested a $30,000 shipment
    of "inverters" from a Turkish textiles firm to Pakistan, allegedly for use
    in the Pakistani uranium enrichment program.[4]

    Relations between Turkey and Pakistan became increasingly close after the
    military coup in Turkey on September 12, 1980. The respective military
    leaders of Turkey and Pakistan, President/General Kenan Evren, and
    President/General Zia ul-Haq exchanged a series of official visits that only
    ended with Zia's 1988 death in a plane crash. In the early 1980s, Greek
    Prime Minister Papandreou charged that "Pakistan expected Turkey to act as a
    transshipper of material for a nuclear bomb and would reciprocate by proudly
    sharing the nuclear bomb technology with Turkey".[5]

    It has also been reported that Canada withdrew its bid to supply CANDU
    reactors to Turkey in the mid-1980s, partly "in response to pressure from
    Western countries which [are] concerned that Turkey may build a nuclear bomb
    based on CANDU technology".[6]

    Concerns about Turkey's potential involvement in nuclear weapons
    proliferation have continued in the 1990s. As noted above, international
    pressure was required in 1990-91 to force an end to joint plans by Argentina
    and Turkey to build the CAREM-25, a 25 MW reactor in their respective
    countries. As noted above, Yalcin Sanalan, a former Director of TAEA stated
    that the CAREM- 25 was "...too small for electricity generation and too big
    for research or training, however, very suitable for plutonium
    production"[7] Furthermore, in 1992, Senator John Glenn and other US
    congressmen accused Turkey of supplying sensitive technology to Pakistan in
    order to aid in that country's acquisition of uranium enrichment
    technology.[8]

    In 1995, a Greek foreign ministry official, Thanos Dokos repeated concerns
    about "nuclear cooperation between Ankara and Islamabad... and reports that
    Turkey might try to acquire nuclear weapons material and technology and
    recruit nuclear scientists from the Muslim republics of the former Soviet
    Union."[9]

    It has been suggested that the American government does not have serious
    concerns about the nuclear proliferation potential of Turkey.[10] However,
    the potential for nuclear weapons proliferation through the sale of CANDU
    reactors to Turkey remains a valid concern. It can be assumed that the
    American government is pleased with the ouster of Erbakan's Islamist
    Refahyol government, and its replacement by the more pro-western government
    of Mesut Yilmaz in June 1997. However, two issues must be raised in
    response. One is that Erbakan may be returned to power in the near future if
    the military allows a democratic election to take place. Second, continued
    military domination of Turkey should not really give any reassurance. As
    noted above, the military has also had strong ties to Pakistan, and may
    favour the creation of `Islamic' nuclear weapons.

    Notes

    1. United Nations, The United Nations and Nuclear Non-Proliferation, UN
    Department of Public Information, 1995, Document 46, p. 183.

    2. Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 33.

    3. United Nations, ibid., p. 62.

    4. Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 35.

    5. "Turkey's role in Pakistan's nuclear program", Worldwide Report, March
    20, 1987, pp. 14. Cited in: Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 35.

    6. "Canadian firm drops bid to build nuclear plant", Nuclear Developments,
    February 25, 1988, p. 39. Cited in: Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 36.

    7. Cited in: Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 38.

    8. Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 39.

    9. Thanos Dokos in "Greece", in Harald Muller, ed., Nuclear Export Controls
    in Europe, Brussels, European Interuniversity Press, 1995, p. 208. Cited in:
    Kibaroglu, ibid., p. 39.

    10. Mark Hibbs, ibid., September 4, 1997, p. 8.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nuclear Awareness Project
    P.O. Box 104
    Uxbridge, Ontario
    Canada
    L9P 1M6

    Tel/Fax 905-852-0571
    E-mail: [email protected]

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X