Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ADL's Curious Indifference Ends On Armenian Genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ADL's Curious Indifference Ends On Armenian Genocide

    ADL'S CURIOUS INDIFFERENCE ENDS ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
    By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Staff

    Boston Globe, MA
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opin ion/editorials/articles/2007/08/21/truth_and_the_a rmenian_genocide/?p1=MEWell_Pos3
    Aug 21 2007

    Truth and the Armenian genocide

    Was there an Armenian genocide during World War I?

    While it was happening, no one called the slaughter of Armenian
    Christians by Ottoman Turks "genocide." No one could: The word wouldn't
    be coined for another 30 years. But those who made it their business
    to tell the world what the Turks were doing found other terms to
    describe the state-sponsored mass murder of the Armenians.

    In its extensive reporting on the atrocities, The New York Times
    described them as "systematic", "deliberate," "organized by
    government," and a "campaign of extermination." A Sept. 25, 1915,
    headline warned: "Extinction Menaces Armenia." What the Turks were
    embarked upon, said one official in the story that followed, was
    "nothing more or less than the annihilation of a whole people."

    Foreign diplomats, too, realized that they were observing genocide
    avant la lettre. American consular reports leaked to the Times
    indicated "that the Turk has undertaken a war of extermination on
    Armenians, especially those of the Gregorian Church, to which about
    90 percent of the Armenians belong." In July, US Ambassador Henry
    Morgenthau cabled Washington that "race murder" was underway - a
    "systematic attempt to uproot peaceful Armenian populations and ...

    to bring destruction and destitution upon them." These were not random
    outbreaks of violence, Morgenthau stressed, but a nationwide slaughter
    "directed from Constantinople."

    Another US diplomat, Consul Leslie Davis, described in grisly detail
    the "reign of terror" he saw in Harput, and the corpses of "thousands
    and thousands" of Armenians murdered near Lake Goeljuk.

    The mass deportations ordered by the Turks, in which hundreds of
    thousands of Armenians were crammed into freight cars and shipped
    hundreds of miles to die in the desert or at the hands of killing
    squads, were far worse than a straightforward massacre, he wrote.

    "In a massacre many escape, but a wholesale deportation of this kind
    in this country means a longer and perhaps even more dreadful death
    for nearly everyone."

    Other eyewitnesses, including American missionaries, provided
    stomach-clenching descriptions of the "terrible tortures" mentioned by
    Morgenthau. Women and girls were stripped naked and raped, then forced
    to march naked through blistering heat. Many victims were crucified
    on wooden crosses; as they writhed in agony, the Turks would taunt
    them: "Now let your Christ come and help you!" Reuters reported that
    "in one village, 1,000 men, women, and children are reported to have
    been locked in a wooden building and burned to death." In another,
    "several scores of men and women were tied together by chains and
    thrown into Lake Van."

    Talaat Pasha, the Turkish interior minister who presided over the
    liquidation of the Armenians, made no bones about his objective.

    "The Government ... has decided to destroy complete all the indicated
    persons" - the Armenians - "living in Turkey," he wrote to authorities
    in Aleppo. "An end must be put to their existence ...

    and no regard must be paid to either age or sex, or to conscientious
    scruples."

    Was there an Armenian genocide during World War I? The Turkish
    government today denies it, but the historical record, chronicled
    in works like Peter Balakian's powerful 2003 study, "The Burning
    Tigris," is overwhelming. Yet the Turks are abetted in their
    denial and distortion by many who know better, including the
    Clinton administration and both Bush administrations, and prominent
    ex-congressmen-turned-lobbyists, including Republican Bob Livingston
    and Democrats Dick Gephardt and Stephen Solarz.

    Particularly deplorable has been the longtime reluctance of some
    leading Jewish organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League,
    the American Jewish Committee, and the American Israel Public Affairs
    Committee, to call the first genocide of the 20th century by its
    proper name. When Andrew Tarsy, the New England director of the
    ADL, came out last week in support of a congressional resolution
    recognizing the Armenian genocide, he was promptly fired by the
    national organization. Shaken by the uproar that followed, the ADL
    finally backed down. The murder of a million Armenians at the hands
    of the Ottoman Turks in 1915, it acknowledged yesterday, was "indeed
    tantamount to genocide."

    Now the other organizations should follow suit. Their unwillingness
    to acknowledge that the Turks committed genocide stems from the
    fear that doing so may worsen the plight of Turkey's beleaguered
    Jewish community, or may endanger the crucial military and economic
    relationship Israel has forged with Turkey. Those are honorable
    concerns. But they cannot justify keeping silent about a most
    dishonorable assault on the truth. Genocide denial must be intolerable
    to everyone, but above all to those for whom "never again" is such a
    sacred principle. And at a time when jihadist violence from Darfur to
    Ground Zero has spilled so much innocent blood, dissimulation about
    the jihad of 1915 can only aid our enemies.

    The Armenian genocide is an incontestable fact of history. Shame on
    anyone who refuses to say so.
Working...
X