Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BEIRUT: In A Danger Zone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BEIRUT: In A Danger Zone

    IN A DANGER ZONE

    Monday Morning, Lebanon
    July 30 2007

    The opposition is to have candidates in both by-elections, in Beirut
    and the Metn, to elect two new MPs to replace the martyrs Walid Eido
    and Pierre Amin Gemayel. The confrontation in Beirut will not be of
    large scope since MP Saad Hariri, leader of the majority and the
    unquestioned leader of Beirut's Sunnite community, is backing the
    candidacy of Amin Itani for the Sunnite seat.

    But the battle in the North Metn will be a stern test for all
    concerned. It will show to what extent the two sides, the majority
    and the opposition, have influence on the Christian scene.

    Sources close to MP General Michel Aoun say he has, or believes he is
    sure of, some 8,000 votes from the local Armenian community, provided
    by the Tashnak Party, and about 10,000, provided by MP Michel Murr.

    This, the sources say, gives him a minimum of 18,000 votes, to which
    will be combined votes from members of the Syrian Social National
    Party and Aoun's own Free Patriotic Movement. These votes, the general
    believes, will carry the election for him. Officials of the Tashnak
    Party have said their backing for Aoun is clear, and Michel Murr says
    his support for the general is "unshakeable".

    Traditionally, Murr has also run on the list of the Kataeb Party, and
    his record of cooperation with the Gemayel family is a long one. But
    some observers say Aoun has persuaded him to depart from his past line.

    This may be true. On the other hand, Murr is working for the future,
    not only for this election, and any misstep might affect his future
    position. For this reason, many observers believe that he will not
    come down fully on one side or the other, but will try to maintain
    equidistance from both, without declaring his stand openly.

    If Aoun's candidate wins the election, that will be represent a serious
    reverse for the March 14 Forces. It would bolster the opposition,
    helping it in its local and external negotiations regarding the
    presidential election and other important issues. It would also
    give credence to the general's repeated assertions that, despite his
    alliance with Hezballah, he is still the most popular politician in
    the Christian community.

    But if the Aoun candidate loses to Amin Gemayel, candidate of
    the majority, it would be clear that his standing in the Christian
    community is waning from its high point two years ago. This would have
    unforeseeable consequences for his alliance with Hezballah and other
    opposition parties, which might begin thinking of backing someone
    else as a plausible presidential candidate, one who is not close to
    the opposition but who at least does not represent the majority. Aoun
    would then not be elected president, and Hezballah would understand
    that it could not rely on Aounist MPs to help it obtain a majority in
    the legislature. In a word, many things would change on the political
    landscape.

    No new president?

    The result of the Metn by-election will be a key indicator of sentiment
    on the Christian scene and give an idea of how the situation may
    develop in regard to the presidential vote.

    Among opposition circles, a list of five names of presidential
    candidates acceptable to external forces supporting the opposition,
    in the hope that an agreement can be reached with the majority on one
    of them. Interestingly, the list does not include the name of General
    Aoun, who therefore is not the opposition's one and only candidate.

    Opposition sources say that Aoun is being kept "in reserve", that his
    "card should not be burned at this early stage".

    The March 8 Forces know that Christian public opinion, not least the
    patriarch, wants a president to be elected; otherwise there would
    be an unacceptable vacuum, and the opposition hopes that Christian
    opinion can be persuaded to accept a neutral personality who has no
    links with the March 14 Forces.

    Another option being canvassed by the opposition is to have an
    "interim" president elected for two years only, in the hope that
    at the end of his two-year term, the situation will have improved
    sufficiently to make possible the election of a successor who would
    serve the full six-year term. The difficulty here is that there is
    nothing about a two-year presidential term in the Constitution, which
    would have to be amended. But this would be seen as giving legitimacy
    to the amendment of 2004 that made possible the extension of President
    Emile Lahoud's term by three years and that led to UN Resolution 1559,
    which was imposed as a punishment for the extension.

    The majority is preparing a counterstrike against these opposition
    scenarios, but the country is in a danger zone. The possibility that
    no new president will be elected in september, and that the country
    will be without a head of state for an indefinite period, is a very
    real one.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X