Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Armenian FM calls Karabakh peace plan "a balanced document"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Armenian FM calls Karabakh peace plan "a balanced document"

    DayAz.org, Azerbaijan
    3 December 2007


    ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER CALLS KARABAKH PEACE PLAN "A BALANCED
    DOCUMENT"


    Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan has called on the sides to
    the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict to make compromises to resolve the
    problem. In an interview with Azerbaijani Day.az website, the
    Armenian minister said that the document, submitted to the
    Azerbaijani and the Armenian presidents in Madrid on the Karabakh
    settlement, requires the political will and determination. The
    minister also believes that the upcoming presidential elections in
    the countries to the conflict should not hinder the negotiations
    process. The minister also urged the parties to work towards
    confidence-building measures to accelerate a settlement. The
    following is the text of interview in Day.az headlined "Vardan
    Oskanyan: `Whoever becomes a new president of Armenia, he will
    continue former line in the Karabakh negotiations process'"

    3 December: Day.az interview with Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan
    Oskanyan

    The US co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, Matthew Bryza, has said that
    the most ever optimum draft agreement on the Nagornyy Karabakh
    settlement is on the negotiating table. To what extent, is it a
    comprise and how acceptable is it for both sides to the conflict?

    "Realities of the past and the present"

    [Oskanyan] We need to make compromises because it is impossible to
    achieve results with the current positions. We have to understand
    that compromises are necessary for a document which is to be endorsed
    by the sides. The extent of the compromises will depend on the
    realities of the past and the present.

    All should be realistic with regard to what can be achieved and what
    cannot be. And based on the realities, the sides should show
    determination and the political will to make the necessary
    compromises for the achievement of peace in our region.

    [Correspondent] Can we say that the upcoming 2008 [presidential]
    elections in Armenia and Azerbaijan will retard the negotiations
    process?

    [Oskanyan] As you see, we are continuing the work on the resolution
    of the problem. True, the elections are to be held but we do not link
    the negotiations to the election. We are continuing our work and the
    co-chairmen pay visits to the region.

    [Correspondent] When do you expect their next visit to the region?

    [Oskanyan] They themselves say they will visit at the end of December
    or in mid-January next year. Thus, we are continuing the process. We
    shall certainly focus on the election, but anyway we shall be
    involved in the negotiations process.

    [Correspondent] Can a change of president in Armenia influence the
    negotiations and lead to a revision of the already achieved
    agreement?

    [Oskanyan] I hope not. This is the reason why the co-chairmen are
    making attempts to inform the world and everybody in Armenia of the
    document which envisages key principles of a settlement.

    "Balanced document"

    Therefore, no matter who is elected, we shall continue the
    negotiations on the basis of this document since it envisages huge
    work done by us. We consider it a solid document comprising all the
    issues; this is an objective and balanced document. Of course, it
    cannot completely make happy everyone as it is a compromise document.
    The proposals there reject maximum demands of the sides.

    So, this is a balanced document. Certainly, we are working to improve
    it. There are a number of issues which need to be agreed, but its
    basis, in my view, is solid. If we could continue our work on the
    basis of this document, no matter who is elected president in Armenia
    and later Azerbaijan, this would mean that the work done over these
    two years was not in vain.

    [Correspondent] Recently the Armenian media quoted Armenian Prime
    Minister Sarah Sargsyan as saying that the religious factor was on
    the basis of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict. This caused a wave of
    protest in Azerbaijan. Later on this statement was rejected by the
    prime minister himself. Could you shed light on the position of
    Armenia with regard to this issue?

    [Oskanyan] Actually, this statement was taken out of context. We have
    always said that this is not a religious conflict; this is the issue
    of self-determination of the Karabakh people. This statement was
    certainly taken out of context. I do not think the prime minister
    could express such an idea.

    Kosovo precedent

    [Correspondent] Do you think the Karabakh settlement depends on the
    Kosovo precedent?

    [Oskanyan] We have always spoken about differences between conflicts
    and each of them has its own ways of settlement. However, as a whole,
    precedents are important. We shall come across them no matter we like
    it or not. But we do not link the resolution of the Kosovo problem to
    the Karabakh one. In our example, Karabakh has its normal course of
    negotiations. Karabakh has itself chosen the way of regarding its
    future based on self-determination, therefore, irrespective of what
    happens in Kosovo, we shall continue the negotiations on the basis of
    the existing principles.

    On the other hand, we cannot but take into consideration the Kosovo
    precedent. If Kosovo acquires independence, no-one can say us that
    nobody else can get independence because freedom has no quota.

    [Correspondent] What kind of self-determination can we speak about
    when it was achieved unilaterally after Azerbaijanis were driven out
    of Nagornyy Karabakh and Armenia?

    [Oskanyan] May be you were very young at that time and do not
    remember the things that happened in Sumqayit and Baku; Armenians
    were expelled from Azerbaijan and it caused a proper reaction in
    Armenia. There were pogroms and ethnic cleansing in Azerbaijan. It
    left a trace in the minds and hearts of Armenians. Therefore, we are
    insisting on confidence-building measures between the sides. If we do
    not resolve the conflict, then next generations will have to do this.

    We are concerned that mutual enmity between our peoples will deepen
    due to the propaganda of hostility in Azerbaijan which is not the
    case in Armenia.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X