Tweet
IRAN NOT WORKING TOWARD BUILDING BOMB SINCE 2003, U.S. INTELLIGENCE SAYS
PanARMENIAN.Net
04.12.2007 13:53 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A new assessment by U.S. intelligence agencies
concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and
that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two
years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be explosive in the
middle of tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to
halt its nuclear energy program, and in the middle of a presidential
campaign during which a possible military strike against Iran's
nuclear program has been discussed.
The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the
consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran's
ultimate intentions about gaining a nuclear weapon remain unclear, but
that Iran's "decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather
than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and
military costs."
"Some combination of threats of intensified international scrutiny and
pressures, along with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security,
prestige and goals for regional influence in other ways, might -
if perceived by Iran's leaders as credible - prompt Tehran to extend
the current halt to its nuclear weapons program," the estimate states.
The new report comes out a little more than five years after a deeply
flawed National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iraq possessed
chemical and biological weapons programs and was determined to restart
its nuclear program. The report led to congressional authorization
for a military invasion of Iraq, although most of the intelligence
estimate's conclusions turned out to be wrong.
The new estimate does say that Iran's ultimate goal is still to
develop nuclear weapons. It concludes that if Iran were to end the
freeze of its weapons program, it would still be at least two years
before Tehran had enough highly enriched uranium to produce a nuclear
bomb. But it says it is "very unlikely" that Iran could produce enough
of the material by then.
Instead, the estimate concludes that it is more likely Iran could
have a bomb by early to the middle of the next decade. The report
says that the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research
judges that Iran is unlikely to achieve this goal before 2013 "because
of foreseeable technical and programmatic problems."
The new assessment upends a judgment made about Iran's nuclear
capabilities in 2005. At the time, intelligence agencies assessed with
"high confidence" that Iran was determined to have nuclear weapons
and concluded that Iraq had a secret nuclear weapons program.
Since then, officials said they had obtained new information leading
them to conclude that international pressure, including tough economic
sanctions, had been successful in bringing about a halt to Iran's
secret program.
"We felt that we needed to scrub all the assessments and sources
to make sure we weren't misleading ourselves," said one senior
intelligence official during a telephone interview, speaking on
condition of anonymity.
In a separate statement accompanying the estimate, the deputy
director of national intelligence, Donald Kerr, said that, given
the new conclusions, it was important to release the report publicly
"to ensure that an accurate presentation is available."
It was not immediately clear whether the report would help or hinder
the U.S. push to tighten sanctions against Iran, which have been
supported by Britain, France and Germany - the three countries leading
negotiations with Iran.
While it seems to blunt the sense of urgency over Iranian nuclear
progress and intentions, it also underscored the apparent effectiveness
of precisely the sort of sanctions the United States wants.
Indeed, the administration sought to make the sanctions argument
on Monday.
"The estimate offers grounds for hope that the problem can be solved
diplomatically without the use of force, as the administration has
been trying to do," Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser,
said in a statement.
"And it suggests that the president has the right strategy:
intensified international pressure along with a willingness to
negotiate a solution that serves Iranian interests while ensuring
that the world will never have to face a nuclear-armed Iran," he said.
"For that strategy to succeed, the international community has to
turn up the pressure on Iran with diplomatic isolation, United Nations
sanctions, and with other financial pressure, and Iran has to decide
if it wants to negotiate a solution."
The report seemed certain to raise new questions about the intelligence
the administration relies on, particularly in making the case for
military action.
It gave new ammunition to those Democrats worried that the
administration might contemplate a military strike against Iranian
nuclear facilities.
But Hadley said that the new analysis "confirms that we were right
to be worried about Iran seeking to develop nuclear weapons," and
concludes that the risk of that happening "remains a very serious
problem."
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the international Atomic
Energy Agency, had reported last month that Iran was now operating
3,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges, capable of producing fissile
material for nuclear weapons.
But his report said that IAEA inspectors in Iran had been unable
to determine whether the Iranian program sought only to generate
electricity or also to build weapons, the AP reports.
PanARMENIAN.Net
04.12.2007 13:53 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A new assessment by U.S. intelligence agencies
concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and
that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two
years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be explosive in the
middle of tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to
halt its nuclear energy program, and in the middle of a presidential
campaign during which a possible military strike against Iran's
nuclear program has been discussed.
The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the
consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran's
ultimate intentions about gaining a nuclear weapon remain unclear, but
that Iran's "decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather
than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and
military costs."
"Some combination of threats of intensified international scrutiny and
pressures, along with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security,
prestige and goals for regional influence in other ways, might -
if perceived by Iran's leaders as credible - prompt Tehran to extend
the current halt to its nuclear weapons program," the estimate states.
The new report comes out a little more than five years after a deeply
flawed National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iraq possessed
chemical and biological weapons programs and was determined to restart
its nuclear program. The report led to congressional authorization
for a military invasion of Iraq, although most of the intelligence
estimate's conclusions turned out to be wrong.
The new estimate does say that Iran's ultimate goal is still to
develop nuclear weapons. It concludes that if Iran were to end the
freeze of its weapons program, it would still be at least two years
before Tehran had enough highly enriched uranium to produce a nuclear
bomb. But it says it is "very unlikely" that Iran could produce enough
of the material by then.
Instead, the estimate concludes that it is more likely Iran could
have a bomb by early to the middle of the next decade. The report
says that the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research
judges that Iran is unlikely to achieve this goal before 2013 "because
of foreseeable technical and programmatic problems."
The new assessment upends a judgment made about Iran's nuclear
capabilities in 2005. At the time, intelligence agencies assessed with
"high confidence" that Iran was determined to have nuclear weapons
and concluded that Iraq had a secret nuclear weapons program.
Since then, officials said they had obtained new information leading
them to conclude that international pressure, including tough economic
sanctions, had been successful in bringing about a halt to Iran's
secret program.
"We felt that we needed to scrub all the assessments and sources
to make sure we weren't misleading ourselves," said one senior
intelligence official during a telephone interview, speaking on
condition of anonymity.
In a separate statement accompanying the estimate, the deputy
director of national intelligence, Donald Kerr, said that, given
the new conclusions, it was important to release the report publicly
"to ensure that an accurate presentation is available."
It was not immediately clear whether the report would help or hinder
the U.S. push to tighten sanctions against Iran, which have been
supported by Britain, France and Germany - the three countries leading
negotiations with Iran.
While it seems to blunt the sense of urgency over Iranian nuclear
progress and intentions, it also underscored the apparent effectiveness
of precisely the sort of sanctions the United States wants.
Indeed, the administration sought to make the sanctions argument
on Monday.
"The estimate offers grounds for hope that the problem can be solved
diplomatically without the use of force, as the administration has
been trying to do," Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser,
said in a statement.
"And it suggests that the president has the right strategy:
intensified international pressure along with a willingness to
negotiate a solution that serves Iranian interests while ensuring
that the world will never have to face a nuclear-armed Iran," he said.
"For that strategy to succeed, the international community has to
turn up the pressure on Iran with diplomatic isolation, United Nations
sanctions, and with other financial pressure, and Iran has to decide
if it wants to negotiate a solution."
The report seemed certain to raise new questions about the intelligence
the administration relies on, particularly in making the case for
military action.
It gave new ammunition to those Democrats worried that the
administration might contemplate a military strike against Iranian
nuclear facilities.
But Hadley said that the new analysis "confirms that we were right
to be worried about Iran seeking to develop nuclear weapons," and
concludes that the risk of that happening "remains a very serious
problem."
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the international Atomic
Energy Agency, had reported last month that Iran was now operating
3,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges, capable of producing fissile
material for nuclear weapons.
But his report said that IAEA inspectors in Iran had been unable
to determine whether the Iranian program sought only to generate
electricity or also to build weapons, the AP reports.