Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Cutting The Gordions Knot - Are The Questions Since 1915 Goi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Cutting The Gordions Knot - Are The Questions Since 1915 Goi

    CUTTING THE GORDIONS KNOT - ARE THE QUESTIONS SINCE 1915 GOING TO BE ANSWERED?
    By Irem Guney, JTW

    Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
    Feb 12 2007

    The assassination of the Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink has
    stimulated the debates about the minority rights in Turkey as well
    as the questions about facing the history regarding the year 1915.

    The recent news about the mass grave in Nusaybin, a town in the
    southeast region of Turkey, deepened the discussions not only between
    Armenians and Turks but also between the international community
    whose majority asks for the recognition of the "genocide" and the
    Turkish people who mostly perceive the happenings as a tragedy for
    both nations during the First World War and refer to the incidences
    as the displacement of Armenians.

    The genocide researcher Prof. David Gaunt from Sodertorns University
    argued that these graves in Nusaybin town belong to Armenians and
    Suryanis and took up the topic to the Swedish Parlament. Following
    this, Prof. Yusuf Halacoðlu, the head of the Turkish Historical Society
    addressed to Mr. Gaunt and other academics who are researching in this
    field, in that he suggested cooperated field work on the graveyards and
    to open up them together. Mr. Gaunt responded to this affirmatively
    whereas his conditions such as absolute freedom in his work, the
    allowance to interview those who have a knowledge about the graves,
    and the entrance to other mass graves around Mardin were also accepted
    by the Turkish Historical Society that is also willing to cover the
    expenses and needs of the researchers who will start their work in
    March. This project is going to be the first of his kind regarding
    the international cooperation, says Mr. Halacoðlu.

    Prof. Yusuf Halacoðlu also commented on the assassination of the
    Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink and referred to it as an important
    loss for Turkish society. Currently, the Turkish Historical Society
    expects the final reply from Mr. Gaunt and his colleagues who, in
    Halacoðlu's view, should apologise if the outcomes would show that
    the graves belong to neither Armenians nor Suryanis but Turkish
    people. Halacoðlu finally stated that they would apologise if the
    researches support the hypothesis of Prof. Gaunt.

    The importance of this cooperation does not only lie in its
    international character but also in its possible outcomes. The lack
    of a mass grave is one of the mostly claimed points of the Turkish
    side against the Armenian arguments. In this view, there must be a
    mass grave for Armenians in the Eastern Turkey or in former Ottoman
    Syria's territories who were displaced in 1915 if one is talking about
    genocide. In Turkish point of view, the hypothesis that most of the
    Armenians were killed on their way is also not very plausible since
    nevertheless there would have been a mass grave for so many people.

    In the last 20 years, there had been some field work on the graveyards
    led by the Turkish Historical Society and some universities like
    Erzurum Ataturk University. However, in these projects there was no
    Armenian researchers who refused the appeal of the Turkish Historical
    Society regarding the cooperation.

    Another crucial point in the research for the possible Armenian graves
    is with respect to the route of the displacement. The significant
    amount of Armenians who were directed to Syria-a province of the
    Ottoman Empire at that time- should, in Turkish point of view, indicate
    to the possibility of mass graves in Syria if there had been the
    genocide against Armenian people. Yet despite its possibility there
    has not been any opening up works in this region which, in Turkish
    perspective, strengthens the position that Armenians want to reach
    conclusions that are based on subjectivity.

    The expected cooperation in Mardin would probably reveal important
    results for both of the parties. On the other hand, one should not
    expect a quick resolution after the research on the mass grave. As the
    experience until today has demonstrated, no matter what the current
    debates are, there is one certain point in the whole debate about
    what happened in 1915. That it will continue for a long time.

    --Boundary_(ID_QMK0CmwVxnds7euEWaUuNA)--
Working...
X