Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

European Court Faults Yerevan In Landmark Ruling

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • European Court Faults Yerevan In Landmark Ruling

    EUROPEAN COURT FAULTS YEREVAN IN LANDMARK RULING
    By Ruzanna Stepanian

    Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
    Jan 11 2007

    In a first-ever ruling relating to Armenia, the European Court of
    Human Rights on Thursday declared illegal the arrest of an Armenian
    opposition activist who helped to organize an anti-government
    demonstration more than four years ago.

    The landmark judgment will raise fresh questions about the legality
    of hundreds of similar arrests that have accompanied the Armenian
    government's controversial crackdowns on the opposition in recent
    years.

    The plaintiff, Armen Mkrtchian, was detained by the police along
    with several other members of the radical opposition Hanrapetutyun
    (Republic) party after actively participating in an unsanctioned
    rally in Yerevan on May 14, 2002. He was released after being fined
    a largely symbolic 500 drams ($1.5) under Armenia's Soviet-era
    Administrative Code.

    Mkrtchian took his case to the Strasbourg-based court in November
    2002, arguing that the Armenian authorities can not sanction anyone
    for attending street protests in the absence of a law regulating the
    constitutionally guaranteed freedom of assembly.

    Armenia enacted such a law only in 2004. Until then, the Armenian
    government invoked Soviet-era regulations that required government
    permission for the holding of rallies and other public gatherings.

    Mkrtchian and his lawyer insist that those can not have a legal force
    in modern-day Armenia.

    A panel of seven European Court judges, among them Armenian Alvina
    Gyulumian, unanimously accepted the 35-year-old oppositionist's
    arguments, ruling that his brief detention violated a key article of
    the European Convention on Human Rights which takes precedence over
    all Armenian laws and government directives. Yerevan signed up to
    the convention when it joined the Council of Europe in January 2001.

    The Strasbourg court cited a lack of "domestic provision which clearly
    stated whether the former USSR laws remained or did not remain in force
    on the territory of Armenia." Its did not impose any penalties on the
    Armenian state, saying that the "finding of a violation constituted
    in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage
    sustained by the applicant."

    Mkrtchian, who did not seek any material compensation, said he is fully
    satisfied with the ruling. "The main purpose of my application was
    to show our judges and rulers that they must honor their obligations
    to the Council of Europe," he told RFE/RL. "They will now be more
    vigilant. I have kind of cleared the way for similar legal challenges
    against illegalities committed in our country."

    The Armenian Justice Ministry, which fought the government's corner in
    Strasbourg, declined comment. A spokeswoman said Justice Minister David
    Harutiunian is too "busy" to immediately react to the development.

    The Armenian authorities used the Administrative Code to arrest
    hundreds of opposition supporters and activists during the presidential
    elections of February-March 2003 and the April-May 2004 opposition
    campaign of street protests against President Robert Kocharian. Many
    of them were sentenced to between five and fifteen days' imprisonment
    in closed overnight trials condemned by local and Western human
    rights groups.

    The Council of Europe has repeatedly criticized the practice of
    so-called "administrative detentions," leading the authorities in
    Yerevan to abolish it last year.
Working...
X