Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Book Review: Young Turks, old family ways

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Review: Young Turks, old family ways

    amNewYork, New York
    Jan 21 2007

    Young Turks, old family ways
    East meets West, and the personal clashes with the political, in Elif
    Shafak's whirling novel

    BY DONNA SEAMAN
    SPECIAL TO NEWSDAY


    January 21, 2007

    THE BASTARD OF ISTANBUL, by Elif Shafak. Viking, 370 pp., $24.95.

    Elif Shafak's provocatively titled second novel, "The Bastard of
    Istanbul," begins on a crowded street in the Turkish metropolis
    during a rainstorm as an increasingly enraged woman hurries over
    broken cobblestones in very high heels. With her lavender miniskirt,
    nose ring, long unruly hair, propensity for swearing and zero
    patience with the lustful eyeballing of men and the censorious
    glances of other women, it's clear that this is a gal Islamic
    conservatives would find more than objectionable. Zeliha is 19 and
    single; she smokes; she purports to be an atheist; and she's on her
    way to the gynecologist for an abortion.




    A somewhat subdued Zeliha returns home to her all-female (except for
    the cat) household just in time for dinner. Food is a constant in
    this womanly tale. Each chapter title is the name of a food or spice,
    and food is presented as nourishment for the soul as well as the
    body, and a source of familial cohesion and cultural pride. As Zeliha
    takes her seat, still pregnant, Shafak circles the groaning table,
    briskly covering a remarkable amount of family and Turkish history as
    she introduces each eccentric character.

    There's Zeliha's enigmatic grandmother, Petite Ma, and Zeliha's
    mother, Gulsum, who "could have been Ivan the Terrible in another
    life." For oldest daughter Banu, food is a vocation. Cevriye is a
    very proper history teacher. Feride the bizarre has been diagnosed
    with assorted mental maladies, and is forever changing her hair color
    and style. The Kazanci family does include a son, Mustafa, once as
    coddled as a king. But he has been hustled off to college in the
    United States in the hope that he will escape the family curse. It
    seems that Kazanci men have always "died young and unexpectedly."
    Shafak is lavish in her descriptions and backstories as conversation
    among the women gets underway, but what isn't said looms large. Why
    is her family indifferent to Zeliha's pregnancy? Who is the father?

    The scene shifts from Istanbul, a mesh of the old and the new, to a
    shiny Arizona supermarket, where Shafak presents another harried and
    aggravated woman. Rose's marriage has failed, leaving her craving
    fattening foods and sweet revenge. Blond, plump and a bit ditzy, Rose
    was married briefly to Barsam, an Armenian, whose extended family
    "was another country where people bore a surname she couldn't spell
    and secrets she couldn't decipher." Now Rose is alone with her baby
    girl, Armanoush, and furious with her meddling ex-in-laws. After she
    runs into handsome and seemingly shy Mustafa in front of the garbanzo
    beans, she thinks: Wouldn't it drive the Tchakhmakhchians crazy if
    she dated a Turk?

    Sure enough, Barsam's family gathers in San Francisco around their
    laden table, utterly distraught, and determined to "rescue" Armanoush
    from Rose and her new Turkish boyfriend (soon to be second husband).
    Barsam's uncle launches into an impassioned speech about how
    Armanoush is the "grandchild of genocide survivors who lost all their
    relatives at the hands of Turkish butchers in 1915."

    It is this passage that landed Shafak in court in Istanbul, accused
    of the crime of denigrating Turkey by using the word "genocide" in
    reference to the forced removal and deaths of more than 1 million
    Armenians. The charge of "insulting Turkishness" has been leveled
    against other Turkish writers, most famously the 2006 Nobel laureate
    Orhan Pamuk, who has spoken publicly about the same taboo subject.
    His case was dropped on a technicality. Shafak faced a possible
    sentence of three years in prison. Pregnant during the trial, she was
    in the hospital with her newborn when she was acquitted.

    Shafak is an outspoken political scientist and activist as well as a
    writer. An expert in gender issues and Turkish history and politics,
    and fascinated by mysticism, she secured every major Turkish literary
    award before she turned 30. Shafak's first English-language novel,
    "The Saint of Incipient Insanities" (2004), was critically acclaimed.
    Her second, a saucy, witty, dramatic and affecting tale in the spirit
    of novels by Amy Tan, Julia Alvarez and Bharati Mukherjee, should
    prove irresistible to readers.

    Jump forward 19 years. Petite Ma is succumbing to Alzheimer's. Feride
    is still crazy, Gulsum still stern, Cevriye still teaching. But Banu
    has become a famous clairvoyant and fortune teller thanks to an
    invisible djinni on each shoulder - one good, Mrs. Sweet; one bad,
    Mr. Bitter. Zehila, still sexy and audacious, is now the proprietor
    of a fashionable tattoo parlor. Her 19-year-old daughter, Asya, is
    just as mouthy and independent as her mother, and simmering with
    pent-up rage about her status as bastard, the mystery of her father's
    identity, and way too much mothering from all the women in the house.
    A die-hard Johnny Cash fan with nihilistic fantasies, she has found a
    secret sanctuary, the Café Kundera, where she hangs out with
    dissident artists and intellectuals, including a cartoonist who has
    just been indicted for the second time for "insulting the prime
    minister in his cartoons."

    Meanwhile, college student Armanoush, disconcertingly beautiful and
    seriously bookish (Kundera is her favorite author), is torn between
    her dizzy if well-meaning mother (she has little to say about her
    quiet Turkish stepfather) and her Armenian father and his warm and
    meddlesome extended family. Increasingly curious about her Armenian
    heritage and enraged about what her grandmother and others suffered,
    she has found refuge in Café Constantinopolis, a cyber cafe
    frequented by grandchildren of the Armenian diaspora and others
    forced out of Istanbul. Determined to trace her roots and come to
    terms with Turkish atrocities, she travels to Istanbul without
    telling either parent. Her stepfather's family welcomes her
    enthusiastically (except for skeptical Asya), then listens in
    bewilderment to her tale about the fate of her Armenian relatives.
    Initially puzzled by the Kazancis' response, Armanoush soon realizes
    that "they had seen no connection between themselves and the
    perpetrators of the crimes. She, as an Armenian, embodied the spirits
    of her people generations and generations earlier, whereas the
    average Turk had no such notion of continuity with his or her
    ancestors. The Armenians and the Turks lived in different time
    frames." Indeed, as Cevriye sees it, the Ottoman Empire is a
    completely separate country from the modern Turkish Republic.

    Armanoush and Asya are useful, and compelling, mirror images. Unlike
    Armanoush, Asya is scornful of history. Without knowing who her
    father is, how can she reflect on her heritage? Like Turkey itself,
    she is denied the truth about the past, and therefore lacks a sense
    of continuity or connection. Shafak tries to be subtle with this sort
    of explication, but she is so intent on illuminating the tragedy of
    the Armenian genocide and the injustice and psychic harm wrought by
    its denial that she does slip into soapbox mode now and then. Because
    of her skill and intensity, however, such authorial intervention,
    common in the great 19th century novels, doesn't detract from the
    reader's appreciation for her complex characters and many-faceted
    plot. And Shafak is careful to balance the gravity of her
    truth-telling mission with humor, until the shocking revelations and
    resolutions of the concluding chapters.

    Shafak's charming, smart and profoundly involving spinning top of a
    novel dramatizes the inescapability of guilt and punishment, and the
    inextricable entwinement of Armenians and Turks, East and West, past
    and present, the personal and the political. By aligning the
    "compulsory amnesia" surrounding the crimes in one family with
    Turkey's refusal to confront past crimes against humanity, Shafak
    makes the case for truth, reconciliation and remembrance. She also
    tells a grandly empathic and spellbinding story.

    Donna Seaman is an associate editor for Booklist, and host of the
    radio program "Open Books" in Chicago.
Working...
X