Tweet
TURKEY: JOURNALIST'S DEATH PUTS FOCUS ON NATIONALISM
Yigal Schleifer 1/22/07
EurasiaNet, NY
Jan 22 2007
The murder of a prominent and outspoken ethnic Armenian journalist has
sent shock waves throughout Turkey, raising questions about whether
a recent nationalist upsurge has taken a violent turn. The killing
threatens to pose a serious challenge to the government's already
embattled democratization and political reform efforts.
The journalist, Hrant Dink, was the editor of the bilingual
Turkish-Armenian weekly newspaper Agos and a vocal critic of Turkey's
treatment of its religious minorities and of its policy of rejecting
claims that the mass killing of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks in
1915 was genocide.
Dink was put on trial several times for "insulting" Turkish identity
with his writings; in 2005 he was convicted in one of the cases and
handed a suspended six-month prison sentence.
The editor was shot three times in broad daylight near the entrance to
the newspaper's offices in Istanbul on January 19. A teenage suspect
from the Black Sea city of Trabzon, Ogun Samast, has confessed to the
shooting, police have announced. Samast is not known to have links
to any militant organizations, according to officials.
"Those who created nationalist sentiment in Turkey have fed such
a monster that there are many youngsters on the streets who do not
find the ... state nationalist enough and are ready to take the law
into their own hands," columnist Ismet Berkan wrote on January 20 in
Radikal, one of Turkey's main dailies, about the murder.
The last few years have seen Turkey engaged in a deep internal
struggle. On the one hand, the country's drive towards European
Union membership has resulted in significant political reforms,
particularly regarding democratization and human rights, and the
freeing up of the debate on what had previously been taboo subjects,
such as the 1915 killing of ethnic Armenians.
On the other hand, the EU-related reforms have been met with a strong
nationalist backlash. Nationalist lawyers and prosecutors, for example,
have been able to use a law, known as article 301, to charge writers
and journalists like Dink and Nobel Prize for Literature laureate Orhan
Pamuk with the crime of insulting the state as a way of stifling the
emerging debates and putting the brakes on Turkey's EU bid.
"In a sense, both sides have been sharpening their axes, thinking
that the EU question is the final intellectual battle in Turkey,"
said Ali Carkoglu, a professor of political science at Istanbul's
Sabanci University. "It touches on everything that is salient in
Turkish politics: the Islam vs. secularism debate, democratization
and the extent to which individual human rights are to be protected."
"These [anti-EU] groups seem to have nothing more than the argument
that some views are bad and should not be voiced," he added.
For many Turks, the killing of Dink harkens back to the turbulent
1970's and 1980's, when journalists and intellectuals were frequently
the victims of ideologically inspired violence. Although Turkey has
moved forward, some wonder whether Dink's murder is an indication
that the political gains made over the last few years have yet to
be consolidated.
"By Turkish standards, [Dink] was playing in a way that the
nationalists were not used to. In a way, he took too many risks,
he underestimated his opponents," said Rifat Bali, an independent
Istanbul-based researcher who studies Turkey's minority communities.
"The message of the murder is 'You shut up, know your limits as an
Armenian or a non-Muslim and do not go public often and repeatedly,
otherwise it will turn out bad for you.'"
"Some of the ultranationalist core of Turkey has not changed,"
Bali continued. "It is a militant core that is ready, if necessary,
to murder its ideological opponents."
Unlike in the past, Turkey's government promptly responded to the
murder, sending top officials to oversee the investigation. The quick
arrest of Samast is also being seen as positive sign, since in the
past perpetrators of such crimes were rarely caught. The teenager's
father identified his son for the police after seeing a television
broadcast of a clip from a security camera that showed the gunman
fleeing the scene.
"A bullet has been fired at democracy and freedom of expression. I
condemn the traitorous hands behind this disgraceful murder," Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan said on television soon after Dink was
murdered. "This was an attack on our peace and stability."
But experts here say the murder poses a major challenge for the Turkish
government, led by the moderately Islamic Justice and Development
Party (AKP). With its EU bid already suffering -- negotiations with
Brussels have been partially suspended since November -- the killing
of a journalist who had already been the target of legal proceedings
that were strongly condemned by the EU will only increase the pressure
on Ankara and further tarnish its image in Europe. [For details,
see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"The image problem was already bad and this can only make it worse.
Turkey will be seen as a country not only curtailing freedom of
expression, but the country that can also produce people who will
assassinate writers and thinkers," said Suat Kiniklioglu, director
of the German Marshall Fund's office in Turkey.
"The atmosphere that [prompted] this person to go after Hrant Dink
with a gun was really the result of the atmosphere created by the
trials brought on by article 301," Kiniklioglu said. "In that respect,
the government will need now to really take article 301 seriously."
Outside of the offices of Agos, an Armenian word that refers to a place
where a seed is growing, a makeshift memorial has been created near the
spot where Dink was gunned down. The night following the journalist's
murder, a crowd of more than 100 people gathered at the site, at one
point some of them chanting, "We are all Hrant. We are all Armenians."
Armenian political leaders and the media have harshly condemned
the murder, with many arguing that the slaying indicates that
Turkey is ill-suited for membership in the European Union. On
January 22, a series of youth organizations marched to the European
Union's mission in Yerevan to protest Dink's death, with one placard
proclaiming "Turkey, your hands are in blood," the online news service
PanArmenian.Net reported.
A press release on the Agos website states that the Agos's aim
was to promote understanding between Turkey and Armenia. Dink,
who founded the paper in 1996, used his last few columns to write
about his legal woes. "For me, 2007 is likely to be a hard year,"
he wrote in one column. "The trials will continue, new ones will be
started. Who knows what other injustices I will be up against."
In his final column, Dink wrote about the increasing amount of hate
mail he was getting, including one letter that scared him enough that
he went to a local prosecutor to ask for protection, although without
any luck.
Although he opposed the official Turkish position on the Armenian
question, Dink was also a strong critic of the Armenian Diaspora and
what he saw as its obsession with vilifying Turkey.
"I don't know anyone else like him who raised his voice for minorities
and democracy in Turkey," commented Murat Celikkan, a veteran Turkish
journalist and human rights activist. "Intellectually he was a very
important figure for Turkey. We don't have anyone else like him."
Editor's Note: Yigal Schleifer is a freelance journalist based in
Istanbul.
Yigal Schleifer 1/22/07
EurasiaNet, NY
Jan 22 2007
The murder of a prominent and outspoken ethnic Armenian journalist has
sent shock waves throughout Turkey, raising questions about whether
a recent nationalist upsurge has taken a violent turn. The killing
threatens to pose a serious challenge to the government's already
embattled democratization and political reform efforts.
The journalist, Hrant Dink, was the editor of the bilingual
Turkish-Armenian weekly newspaper Agos and a vocal critic of Turkey's
treatment of its religious minorities and of its policy of rejecting
claims that the mass killing of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks in
1915 was genocide.
Dink was put on trial several times for "insulting" Turkish identity
with his writings; in 2005 he was convicted in one of the cases and
handed a suspended six-month prison sentence.
The editor was shot three times in broad daylight near the entrance to
the newspaper's offices in Istanbul on January 19. A teenage suspect
from the Black Sea city of Trabzon, Ogun Samast, has confessed to the
shooting, police have announced. Samast is not known to have links
to any militant organizations, according to officials.
"Those who created nationalist sentiment in Turkey have fed such
a monster that there are many youngsters on the streets who do not
find the ... state nationalist enough and are ready to take the law
into their own hands," columnist Ismet Berkan wrote on January 20 in
Radikal, one of Turkey's main dailies, about the murder.
The last few years have seen Turkey engaged in a deep internal
struggle. On the one hand, the country's drive towards European
Union membership has resulted in significant political reforms,
particularly regarding democratization and human rights, and the
freeing up of the debate on what had previously been taboo subjects,
such as the 1915 killing of ethnic Armenians.
On the other hand, the EU-related reforms have been met with a strong
nationalist backlash. Nationalist lawyers and prosecutors, for example,
have been able to use a law, known as article 301, to charge writers
and journalists like Dink and Nobel Prize for Literature laureate Orhan
Pamuk with the crime of insulting the state as a way of stifling the
emerging debates and putting the brakes on Turkey's EU bid.
"In a sense, both sides have been sharpening their axes, thinking
that the EU question is the final intellectual battle in Turkey,"
said Ali Carkoglu, a professor of political science at Istanbul's
Sabanci University. "It touches on everything that is salient in
Turkish politics: the Islam vs. secularism debate, democratization
and the extent to which individual human rights are to be protected."
"These [anti-EU] groups seem to have nothing more than the argument
that some views are bad and should not be voiced," he added.
For many Turks, the killing of Dink harkens back to the turbulent
1970's and 1980's, when journalists and intellectuals were frequently
the victims of ideologically inspired violence. Although Turkey has
moved forward, some wonder whether Dink's murder is an indication
that the political gains made over the last few years have yet to
be consolidated.
"By Turkish standards, [Dink] was playing in a way that the
nationalists were not used to. In a way, he took too many risks,
he underestimated his opponents," said Rifat Bali, an independent
Istanbul-based researcher who studies Turkey's minority communities.
"The message of the murder is 'You shut up, know your limits as an
Armenian or a non-Muslim and do not go public often and repeatedly,
otherwise it will turn out bad for you.'"
"Some of the ultranationalist core of Turkey has not changed,"
Bali continued. "It is a militant core that is ready, if necessary,
to murder its ideological opponents."
Unlike in the past, Turkey's government promptly responded to the
murder, sending top officials to oversee the investigation. The quick
arrest of Samast is also being seen as positive sign, since in the
past perpetrators of such crimes were rarely caught. The teenager's
father identified his son for the police after seeing a television
broadcast of a clip from a security camera that showed the gunman
fleeing the scene.
"A bullet has been fired at democracy and freedom of expression. I
condemn the traitorous hands behind this disgraceful murder," Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan said on television soon after Dink was
murdered. "This was an attack on our peace and stability."
But experts here say the murder poses a major challenge for the Turkish
government, led by the moderately Islamic Justice and Development
Party (AKP). With its EU bid already suffering -- negotiations with
Brussels have been partially suspended since November -- the killing
of a journalist who had already been the target of legal proceedings
that were strongly condemned by the EU will only increase the pressure
on Ankara and further tarnish its image in Europe. [For details,
see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"The image problem was already bad and this can only make it worse.
Turkey will be seen as a country not only curtailing freedom of
expression, but the country that can also produce people who will
assassinate writers and thinkers," said Suat Kiniklioglu, director
of the German Marshall Fund's office in Turkey.
"The atmosphere that [prompted] this person to go after Hrant Dink
with a gun was really the result of the atmosphere created by the
trials brought on by article 301," Kiniklioglu said. "In that respect,
the government will need now to really take article 301 seriously."
Outside of the offices of Agos, an Armenian word that refers to a place
where a seed is growing, a makeshift memorial has been created near the
spot where Dink was gunned down. The night following the journalist's
murder, a crowd of more than 100 people gathered at the site, at one
point some of them chanting, "We are all Hrant. We are all Armenians."
Armenian political leaders and the media have harshly condemned
the murder, with many arguing that the slaying indicates that
Turkey is ill-suited for membership in the European Union. On
January 22, a series of youth organizations marched to the European
Union's mission in Yerevan to protest Dink's death, with one placard
proclaiming "Turkey, your hands are in blood," the online news service
PanArmenian.Net reported.
A press release on the Agos website states that the Agos's aim
was to promote understanding between Turkey and Armenia. Dink,
who founded the paper in 1996, used his last few columns to write
about his legal woes. "For me, 2007 is likely to be a hard year,"
he wrote in one column. "The trials will continue, new ones will be
started. Who knows what other injustices I will be up against."
In his final column, Dink wrote about the increasing amount of hate
mail he was getting, including one letter that scared him enough that
he went to a local prosecutor to ask for protection, although without
any luck.
Although he opposed the official Turkish position on the Armenian
question, Dink was also a strong critic of the Armenian Diaspora and
what he saw as its obsession with vilifying Turkey.
"I don't know anyone else like him who raised his voice for minorities
and democracy in Turkey," commented Murat Celikkan, a veteran Turkish
journalist and human rights activist. "Intellectually he was a very
important figure for Turkey. We don't have anyone else like him."
Editor's Note: Yigal Schleifer is a freelance journalist based in
Istanbul.