Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenian Reporter - 7/21/2007 - front section

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenian Reporter - 7/21/2007 - front section

    ARMENIAN REPORTER
    PO Box 129
    Paramus, New Jersey 07652
    Tel: 1-201-226-1995
    Fax: 1-201-226-1660
    Web: http://www.reporter.am
    Email: [email protected]

    July 21, 2007 -- From the front section

    To see the printed version of the newspaper, complete with photographs
    and additional content, visit www.reporter.am and download the pdf
    files. It's free.

    1. Bako Sahakian is elected president of Karabakh (by Emil Sanamyan)
    * Election marked by high turnout, judged "free and fair"

    2. Alex and Marie Manoogian laid to rest at Holy Etchmiadzin (by Vincent
    Lima)
    * An unprecedented honor

    3. Many Armenians leave Baghdad for northern Iraq -- or Armenia (by
    Armen Hakobyan)
    * Relief Fund helps families move to Armenia

    4. Turkey to hold parliamentary elections on July 22 (by Talin Suciyan)

    5. Man in the News: Bako Sahakian
    * A decent family man with street smarts and a knack for justice and
    keeping his word

    6. Man in the News: Masis Mayilian

    7. Artsakh elects a new president (by Armen Hakobyan)
    * Here they are convinced that democracy is not optional

    8. From Armenia, in brief
    * Royal Armenia executives set free
    * Armenia has a new chief tax collector
    * USAID and EBRD assist small and medium enterprises in Armenia

    9. Two sides of Yerevan urbanism (by Karen Mikaelian)
    * Construction at Tamanyan Park and by Swan Lake

    10. Market update by Haik Papian

    11. Living in Armenia: With home ownership comes a sense of belonging
    (by Maria Titizian)

    12. Commentary: Doublespeak and double standards -- over democracy in
    Karabakh (by Tatul Hakobyan)

    13. Editorial: Karabakh votes (again)

    ***************************************** **********************************

    1. Bako Sahakian is elected president of Karabakh

    * Election marked by high turnout, judged "free and fair"

    by Emil Sanamyan

    STEPANAKERT, Karabakh -- According to preliminary results released in
    the morning of July 20 by the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) of
    the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Bako Sahakian is on his way to being
    certified as the victor in the July 19 election for the next president
    of Karabakh.

    With 67,695 votes counted for all candidates, NKR CEC chair Sergei
    Nasibian reported that Mr. Sahakian led with 57,828 votes or 85.42%,
    followed by Masis Mayilian with 8,270 votes (12.21%), Armen Abgarian
    with 856 votes (1.26%), Hrant Melkumian with 532 votes (0.8%), and
    Vania Avanesian with 202 votes (0.3%).

    Of the 92,152 registered voters in NKR, 71,285 (or more than 77
    percent) turned out to vote in the election. The voters were most
    active in the Askeran (82 percent) and New Shahumian (80 percent)
    regions, with the turnout lowest in Stepanakert (55 percent).

    The report of the Independent American Monitoring Delegation
    released on July 20 described the elections as "conducted freely and
    in a transparent way according to both the laws of Nagorno-Karabakh
    and international standards."

    The American monitors were led by retired ambassador Vladimir Matic,
    a former senior Yugoslav diplomat now teaching international relations
    at Clemson University, and Paul Williams, a former State Department
    lawyer and director of the Public International Law & Policy Group.

    Both Mr. Matic and Mr. Williams have monitored Karabakh elections in
    the past, and they pointed to "steady progress in building democratic
    institutions and developing the practice of participation in the
    political process."

    Other observers from Europe, Russia, Armenia, and other former
    Soviet republics largely concurred with the view of the American
    delegation.

    This correspondent was able to visit several polling stations in
    Stepanakert and Shushi, and observed an orderly and transparent voting
    process.

    As the voting concluded at 8 p.m. on July 19, local public
    television aired the counting process live from a number of precincts
    around Karabakh. Mr. Sahakian, who has held cabinet-level positions in
    security and law-enforcement since 2001, and was backed both by the
    incumbent government and the parliamentary opposition, took an early
    commanding lead.

    The campaign of Mr. Sahakian's main opponent Mr. Mayilian filed more
    than a dozen complaints to the CEC claiming procedural violations
    during voting. The CEC's Mr. Nasibian said that about half of these
    complaints were addressed on July 19, with the rest still under review
    as of press time.

    Mr. Mayilian, speaking at a press conference in the afternoon of
    July 20 said that it would be "fair to note that [violations] had no
    decisive impact on the final results." He said he will congratulate
    Mr. Sahakian for his victory as soon as the final results are
    published. "The most important thing," he said, "is that the supremacy
    of law won in this country and that means a victory for our country."

    ********************************** *****************************************

    2. Alex and Marie Manoogian laid to rest at Holy Etchmiadzin

    * An unprecedented honor

    by Vincent Lima

    VAGHARSHAPAT, Armenia -- The remains of the legendary benefactors Alex
    and Marie Manoogian, which last week had been moved to Armenia from
    the Evergreen Cemetery in Detroit, were buried on July 17 in the
    hallowed grounds of Holy Etchmiadzin.

    "We understand that only the remains of Catholicoses are enshrined
    in this holy site and the addition of my parents is an exception,"
    Richard Manoogian said in a speech on the occasion. "This is a very
    special honor bestowed upon them by the Armenian Church."

    During the second half of the 20th century, Alex Manoogian, as
    president and then life president of the Armenian General Benevolent
    Union, endowed dozens of Armenian schools and cultural centers around
    the globe. He endowed chairs in Armenian studies. He was instrumental
    in the construction of the St. John Armenian Church in Southfield,
    Mich., and the St. Vartan Cathedral in New York City. Among the
    projects he supported in Armenia was the Treasury Museum at
    Etchmiadzin, in front of which his remains and those of his wife are
    now interred.

    Catholicos of All Armenians Karekin II presided over the ceremony.
    President Robert Kocharian attended, as did Speaker Tigran Torosian,
    Prime Minister Serge Sargsian, Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian, and
    Defense Minister Mikael Harutiunian. Alex Manoogian had been awarded
    the title of "National Hero of the Republic of Armenia" in 1993.

    President Arkady Ghoukasian of Karabakh was also present, as were
    members of the Manoogian family.

    * Where their hearts were

    Born in 1901 in Kasaba, near Smyrna, Alex Manoogian arrived in Ellis
    Island in 1920 with $50 in his pocket. He moved to Detroit in 1927.
    Two years later, he purchased used machinery and formed MASCO,
    producing parts for the automotive industry.

    "MASCO grew from a little machine shop into the biggest building
    products company in the world," Manoogian's daughter Louise Simone
    said in a speech. "But his heart was always with Armenians."

    As was the heart of Marie Manoogian, who died in 1993. "What she
    loved the most was to travel the world," Chris Simone remembered of
    her grandmother. "That was her joy. She got to see so many different
    Armenians in different parts of the world, and how they were living."

    "In those days when life in Armenia and the diaspora was separated
    by an iron curtain, Alex Manoogian, as the native son of his people,
    was always connected to the concerns of the homeland and lived with
    its hopes," the Catholicos said in a speech. "He lived and toiled with
    the belief in the unity of our people, the liberty of our homeland,
    and the renaissance of Armenian life.

    "Generation upon generation of our children will visit the Treasury
    Museum built through the patronage of Alex and Marie Manoogian and
    come to pay respects to their final resting place. They will pray
    within the churches constructed and renovated by their donations;
    learn in educational institutions operating under their sponsorship;
    and be inspired by their good works and their patriotic and
    church-loving spirit and example, for although 'born as mortals,
    [they] bequeathed an immortal memory.' It is in this manner that a
    people endure -- through devotion, service, noble and valiant deeds
    and an appreciation and evaluation thereof -- from generation to
    generation. This is the path and life of a blessed people," the
    Catholicos continued.

    In his speech, Richard Manoogian said that his father "always
    remembered fondly his time spent in Armenia, and especially the day
    the Alex and Marie Manoogian Museum here was dedicated. He expressed
    his deep feelings by stating: 'Every person has a dream in life. For
    me it had always been a dream to be able to add my own brick to the
    edifice of our ancestral homeland.... I feel rewarded that I have had
    the opportunity to place a stone on the hallowed soil of the homeland
    at the most sacred site of Holy Etchmiadzin.'"

    It was Marie Manoogian who came to Armenia first, in 1955. The
    occasion was the election of a new catholicos.

    Alex Manoogian followed some 16 years later. "In September 1971, the
    three M's -- Manoogian, Mardigian, and Mugar -- visited Armenia," Fr.
    Dajad Davidian, former pastor of the St. James Armenian Church in
    Watertown, Mass., remembered. "They dedicated the renovation of the
    Geghard Monastery. And they went to see Anoush at the Opera House."

    * An ongoing legacy

    In an address on behalf of the assembled officials, Speaker Torosian
    said, "Alex Manoogian's life and work was a remarkable embodiment of
    love and dedication -- for his family, his people and our homeland.
    And this is why, even after his earthly life has come to an end, his
    work is being continued by his children, Louise Manoogian Simone and
    Richard Manoogian."

    Ms. Simone succeeded her father as president of the AGBU in 1989,
    just after Armenia had been devastated by an earthquake and soon
    before it achieved independence. Inside and outside the AGBU, she has
    been a leader in Armenian philanthropy. Richard Manoogian continued to
    run MASCO and has made significant donations to Armenian causes
    through the Manoogian foundations.

    "This was like a dream for my parents," Richard Manoogian said. "You
    cannot imagine how pleased they'd be."

    In her speech, Louise Simone said, "Today, I can feel my parents
    smiling in heaven, amazed that a new era has begun in their lives; and
    grateful to His Holiness that they will now rest eternally on this
    blessed earth of Holy Etchmiadzin, the heart and soul of every
    Armenian, past, present, and future.

    "President Robert Kocharian, our family thanks you for all you've
    done. We will never forget the impressive reception upon my parents'
    arrival and today's emotional interment. Even my father, with all his
    dreams, could not have imagined these last few days. We would also
    like to express our deep appreciation to the President of
    Nagorno-Karabakh, Arkady Ghoukassian, for joining us today, the
    President of the Parliament Tigran Torosian, and Prime Minister Serge
    Sargsian, for their presence, both at the airport and today at Holy
    Etchmiadzin," Ms. Simone continued.

    The police escort that brought the Manoogian family to Etchmiadzin
    reminded Richard Manoogian, Jr., of the police lining the streets
    during his grandfather's funeral in Detroit in 1996. Alex Manoogian
    was a legend for many Armenians, his grandson acknowledged, "but for
    us he was grandpa. He took us to baseball games, he played cards with
    us. He was a great bridge player." Richard Manoogian recalled that his
    grandfather had set up a bridge club. "We'd go and play. It was a
    great way to spend time with him."

    "So many memories," said Berge Setrakian, president of the AGBU. "In
    his last speech before leaving the presidency of the AGBU, he
    remembered Gen. McArthur's statement that old soldiers do not die;
    they just fade away. 'If I were to be born again,' he said, 'I'd like
    to be born as an Armenian.' Those were such memorable words."

    Nishan Atinizian of the Eastern Diocese said, "This is a great honor
    and quite appropriate for a man who dedicated 50 years of his life to
    benefaction of the Armenian nation. It will serve as an example to
    others, who should aspire to be so worthy."

    Being an example was important to Alex Manoogian. Artemis Nazarian
    of Englewood, N.J., remembered Alex Manoogian coming to dinner at
    their house. The subject of conversation turned to anonymous
    donations. "He did not believe in anonymous donations, he said. He
    believed that putting his name to a donation inspired others to give
    as well."

    Fr. Davidian said that Mr. Manoogian had sponsored him for seven
    years, first at the seminary in Antelias, Lebanon, and then for four
    years at General Theological Seminary in New York. "He paid my
    educational expenses and more. And he never pressured me. He really
    did not seek honors. He did not expect thank-you letters." On the
    contrary, "he would occasionally write a note saying he was proud of
    me."

    ************************************ ***************************************

    3. Many Armenians leave Baghdad for northern Iraq -- or Armenia

    * Relief Fund helps families move to Armenia

    by Armen Hakobyan

    YEREVAN -- The number of Armenians in Baghdad in recent years has
    dropped to 15 thousand from 20 thousand, according to Dr. Vehooni
    Minasian, vice-chair of the Armenian Diocesan Council of Iraq. The
    ongoing fighting, the periodic acts of terrorism, and kidnappings for
    ransom have had their toll on all who make Iraq their home.
    Iraqi-Armenians have been no exception.

    The presence of Armenian peacekeepers in Iraq may have added to the
    vulnerability of Iraqi-Armenians. The sixth contingent of
    peacekeepers, comprising 46 soldiers, left for Iraq on July 18,
    replacing the fifth contingent that was there since February 2.
    Meanwhile, citing the Beirut Armenian daily Aztag, panarmenian.net
    reports that a car bomb exploded in front of the Armenian Embassy in
    Baghdad on July 16. According to the same source, the car belonged to
    the Iraqi police. The embassy has not been operating since the
    beginning of the war, and the staff are not in Iraq.

    Dr. Minasian responded to the Armenian Reporter's written questions this
    week.

    "Everywhere community life is practically paralyzed. There are four
    churches in Baghdad, one each in Basra, Kirkuk, Zakho, and the
    Armenian village of Avzrug, and two in Mosul, one of which is newly
    built and was subjected to a terrorist attack in 2004. While it is
    hard to attend church in some areas, nonetheless our community last
    year laid the foundation for a new church in [the northern city of]
    Duhok."

    The Mother See at Holy Etchmiadzin is in constant contact with the
    diocese, Dr. Minassian reports. Many Armenian communities responded
    generously to an appeal by the Catholicos to help the Iraqi-Armenian
    community. "We understand that our compatriots who have taken refuge
    in Armenia did not having difficulties relocating there. In the United
    States, in Los Angeles, alumni of Iraqi-Armenian schools have been
    sending money to the community and have been supporting the schools
    here."

    Dr. Minasian confirms reports that many Armenian families are moving
    to the north of Iraq, where life is safer. Erbil and the former
    Armenian village of Havrezk have received the bulk of the Armenian
    refugees, about 100 families in each location, he says. The diocese
    has established committees to address the spiritual, cultural, and
    educational needs of the new communities. Erbil will have a new
    Armenian center soon, he adds.

    The north of Iraq may be relatively peaceful now, but hundreds of
    Turkish soldiers crossed the border on June 6, allegedly in hot
    pursuit of Kurdish guerrillas. They are said to have returned to
    Turkey the same day. Turkish generals are said to be eager to have
    troops cross the border and stay there. Dr. Minasian is concerned
    especially for Armenians living in the villages of Avzrug and Havrezk,
    which are 10-25 km (6-15 mi) from the border.

    * Refugees in Armenia

    According to various sources, there are between 300 and 500
    Iraqi-Armenians in Armenia today.

    Since 2004, a group of Iraqi-Armenians in Los Angeles have
    established the Iraqi Armenian Relief Fund to assist Iraqi-Armenians
    resettle in Armenia. Gayane Muradian, the fund's representative in
    Yerevan, says, "To help Iraqi-Armenians adversely affected by the war,
    some patriots, namely Sarkis Tertsakian, who is the president of the
    fund, Raffi Garabedian, Khachig Janoyan, Krikor Diramerian, and
    others, formed the fund."

    Many Armenians gave generously to the fund, Ms. Muradian says. The
    Catholicos, the president of Armenia, and the government have welcomed
    the fund's activities and have been helpful, especially through the
    Migration Agency, she added.

    A waiting list of Iraqi-Armenian families has been established. So
    far about 70 families are on the list. On November 1, 2005, four
    families, and on September 28, 2006, three families made the move. The
    seven families comprised 31 individuals. The fund chose families most
    adversely affected by the war.

    The families reached Aleppo on their own. The Armenian consulate
    there helped them with visa formalities at no charge. Then the fund
    flew them to Armenia. A plane ticket costs $160.

    But that was just the beginning. For the first four families, the
    fund rented four apartments in the Arabkir district of Yerevan. They
    made sure the families were located close to each other, at least
    initially, as they acclimatized. They disbursed $1,000 to each family
    for the first year, in monthly installments. They helped them look for
    work so they could make it on their own in the second year and
    thereafter. The allocation has been raised to $1,200 because of the
    weakness of the dollar.

    The contingent that arrived in 2005 has already been granted
    Armenian citizenship. The Migration Agency has registered them as
    refugees, Ms. Muradian says, and the Armenian Red Cross helps them
    with much-needed pharmaceuticals as well as food.

    The Iraqi Armenian Relief Fund has also arranged for the relocated
    Iraqi-Armenians, who are native speakers of Western Armenian, to
    attend free classes in Eastern Armenian, which is spoken in Armenia.

    Another ten families are expected very soon. And the president of
    the fund, Mr. Tertsakian, will come from the United States to greet
    them personally.

    connect:
    www.IraqiArmenianReliefFund. com

    ********************************************* ******************************

    4. Turkey to hold parliamentary elections on July 22

    by Talin Suciyan

    ISTANBUL -- Turkey is living through a very dull pre-election period.
    Although 14 parties and independent candidates are competing with one
    another in the parliamentary elections set for Sunday, July 22, anyone
    coming from abroad will think that the colorful flags adorning the
    streets are just for decoration. Had meetings in Istanbul not been
    organized during the past weekend, no one would have guessed that the
    country is about to elect a new parliament. This election will most
    likely alter the political landscape that was established over the
    past four years.

    The experts I have been talking to during the last few weeks about
    the elections agree on some major points. According to their
    predictions, a larger number of parties than before will be
    represented in the next parliament. The parties that have the most
    chances of securing seats are: the governing Justice and Development
    Party (JDP/AK Party), the opposition Republican People's Party
    (RPP/CHP), and the Nationalist Movement Party (NMP/MHP). According to
    opinion polls and experts, JDP will form around 40 percent of the
    parliament, 25 percent will go to RPP, and NMP will secure 12-18
    percent of the seats. NMP will be entering parliament for the first
    time.

    Another big difference will be the presence of independent
    candidates. Independents are expected to form fully 20 percent of
    parliament. Most of the independent candidates are supported by the
    Democratic Society Party (DSP/DTP) whose main electorate is the
    Kurdish population. DSP decided to participate in the election through
    independent candidates in order avoid the 10 percent threshold parties
    must overcome to win seats. If there are 20 independent candidates in
    the parliament then they can form a group.

    One independent candidate is Professor Baskin Oran, a very
    well-known figure in both Turkish and Armenian society. For the past
    ten years, Mr. Oran has been writing a column for Agos, the
    Turkish-Armenian weekly. He is well known for his studies on minority
    rights and issues concerning the Lausanne Treaty of 1923.

    Professor Fuat Keyman of Koc University's International Relations
    Department says, "In this election there is no left. There are parties
    in various forms of right, but the only left we have is couple of
    independent candidates." Indeed JDP, which took an important step
    forward with democratizing reforms, is identifying itself as
    center-right.

    Gulgun Erdogan Tosun, a professor at Ege University, underlines the
    same point, saying that although JDP is a center-right party, it is
    the most liberal party at the moment and the only party which sees EU
    accession as crucial for Turkey's democratization and development.
    According to her, there is almost no other choice for liberal,
    democratic citizens who view the European Union dynamic as necessary
    for Turkey.

    There are hardly any differences between RPP and NMP, the former
    proclaiming itself to be a social-democratic party and the latter
    identifying as a nationalist party. Tanju Tosun, a professor at Ege
    University, identifies RPP as a nationalist, militarist, and
    conservative party. Ironically, RPP is a member of the Socialist
    International.

    There is evidence for such an assertion. It was, for example, Bayram
    Meral of RPP, commenting on a law aimed at ending the confiscation of
    properties belonging primarily to minority foundations, who said "I
    congratulate you. You put everything aside, you put the problems of
    workers aside, and you deal with Agop's property now."

    During the election campaign it was the same RPP that used a map
    showing Erzurum as part of Armenia, and claimed that in the framework
    of reshaping the Middle East, Erzurum will be handed over to Armenia.
    The slogan was, "Did you know that Erzurum will be given to Armenia?"

    The only plank on NMP's platform is to bring back the death penalty
    and execute Abdullah Ocalan, who has been in prison since his arrest
    in 1999. NMP is building its entire political discourse on this issue.

    Experts say that RPP will lose its electorate to NMP, which is most
    likely to create more of a consensus between the two parties against
    JDP.

    Gulgun Erdogan Tosun says that this election is seen as a
    confrontation between secular republican ideals and antisecularism.
    RPP has a claim on the former, while the latter is a characteristic of
    JDP. Turkish democracy will again have to pass a crucial exam. If the
    governing party JDP comes back to parliament with 40 percent or more,
    the electorate will have given an important signal to those who want
    to underestimate JDP's acceptance by society and are ready to sidestep
    democratic methods. JDP tries to attain its position by showing its
    persistence in the existing democratic political order.

    Gulgun Erdogan Tosun mentions that Turkey is a country that develops
    through crises. And after each crisis, the electorate passes judgment
    and gives its response to the politicians by voting for the ones who
    didn't cause the crisis. By July 23, we will know what the response
    will be and how the will of the people will unfold.

    ***************************************** **********************************

    5. Man in the News: Bako Sahakian

    * A decent family man with street smarts and a knack for justice and
    keeping his word

    STEPANAKERT, Karabakh -- As journalists and observers entered Karabakh
    this week through the winding mountain road, they were met by
    unusually cool and rainy weather and a banner, "Bako Sahakian is our
    candidate" straddling the main road through the Kashatagh district.

    And on July 19, as voters flocked to polling stations around
    Karabakh to vote for their next president, the 46-year-old Mr.
    Sahakian had the biggest advantage any candidate could wish for: a
    widespread public belief in his inevitable victory.

    ***

    This expectation began to take shape last spring after Mr. Sahakian,
    the director of Karabakh's National Security Service, was nominated on
    a civic initiative and soon received endorsements from leaders of all
    four political parties represented in Karabakh's parliament; the war
    veterans' association, Karabakh's most important nongovernmental
    group; and most recently President Arkady Ghoukassian.

    Still, in a July 17 interview with the Armenian Reporter, Mr.
    Sahakian said that he is "not a pro-establishment candidate," and that
    he sees both "achievements and shortcomings" in Mr. Ghoukassian's
    presidency.

    When asked to name some of the shortcomings, however, Mr. Sahakian
    declined to go into specifics. He did note, however, that public
    concerns with social and economic problems, such as availability of
    well-paying jobs and state-funded infrastructure and services, are the
    focus of his campaign.

    Mr. Sahakian appeared able to win over the two main segments of the
    Karabakh electorate -- those who are generally happy with the outgoing
    president's policies and see Mr. Sahakian as a supporter of the status
    quo, and those who seek a stepped-up government reform effort.

    In the July 17 interview, Mr. Sahakian also argued for the
    continuation of the government policy of insisting on Karabakh's
    participation in negotiations on the future status of the republic.

    Asked if Karabakh should take steps to seek unilateral recognition
    of the republic, Mr. Sahakian said that he did "not think it was the
    right approach" and held out hope that direct negotiations between
    Karabakh and Azerbaijan would bring about a mutually agreeable result.

    And when asked whether Karabakh should participate more actively in
    the Russia-backed effort to coalesce the four unrecognized republics
    in the former Soviet territory, and act through a joint platform, Mr.
    Sahakian was noncommittal, adding that issues that "do not contradict
    our interests can become a subject for discussion."

    ***

    A Stepanakert native and graduate of one of the local high schools,
    Mr. Sahakian did his mandatory military service and then began an
    initially unremarkable career as a skilled worker and then a supplies
    specialist for the local government.

    But just as for other Karabakhis, for Mr. Sahakian things changed
    radically in 1988 with the start of the movement for reunification
    with Armenia. He joined the Karabakh self-defense forces in 1990 and
    from 1992 and throughout the war was one of the key persons
    responsible for supplying these forces with everything they needed,
    from food to weapons. Mr. Sahakian was decorated with Karabakh's
    highest medal for valor -- the Combat Cross, first degree.

    From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Sahakian was seconded to Armenia's Ministry
    of Interior and National Security (then headed by the current Prime
    Minister Serge Sargsian).

    Because that assignment involved a lengthy posting in Moscow, Mr.
    Sahakian's opponents suggested that he may not fulfill the 10-year
    residency requirement for presidential nominees. But the Central
    Electoral Commission ruled that in those years Mr. Sahakian remained
    in state service and therefore was qualified to run.

    In 1999, Mr. Sahakian returned to Karabakh to serve first as the
    Interior (Police) Minister and since 2001 as National Security Service
    director, a position he resigned last month when he sought
    registration as a candidate.

    To those who observed him closely in Stepanakert, he is known as a
    decent family man with street smarts and a knack for justice and
    keeping his word. As minister and government service director Mr.
    Sahakian was praised for his energy, leadership skills, and defense of
    the small guy.

    And even his current opponents have seen him as a potential ally for
    reform.

    -Emil Sanamyan

    **************************************** ***********************************

    6. Man in the News: Masis Mayilian

    STEPANAKERT, Karabakh -- Here in Stepanakert at least, 39-year-old
    presidential candidate Masis Mayilian appeared to be running a
    campaign as prominent as that of frontrunner Bako Sahakian, at least
    if judged by the availability of posters.

    Outside the capital, however, the story was different and Mr.
    Sahakian's visibility was clearly unrivaled. But even in Stepanakert,
    Mr. Mayilian's sole campaign office was located in the office of an
    electronics store located on a side street, while Mr. Sahakian's
    campaign boasted nine offices.

    Despite a clear mismatch in resources and financial support, Mr.
    Mayilian himself insisted in a July 17 interview with the Armenian
    Reporter that he was "only thinking of victory."

    ***

    Mr. Mayilian announced his intention to run for president later than
    the other four candidates, and just as the deadline for nominations
    was approaching. Asked why he decided to run, Mr. Mayilian pointed to
    15 years of experience in government, and expressed a conviction that
    he was in a position to implement "a program of reforms in order to
    strengthen our country and speed up its development tempo."

    Mr. Mayilian also claimed that the political parties' decision not
    to nominate their own candidates, but jointly endorse Mr. Sahakian put
    the "conduct of elections under threat." He argued that "were it not
    for my nomination, this would have become not an election, but an
    appointment with no real alternative offered."

    The focus of Mr. Mayilian's campaign has been on "real reform,
    supremacy of the law, and international recognition of Artsakh." He
    pointed to what he called "conservative forces that have united around
    the [Sahakian] candidacy" and suggested that the current political
    struggle transcends the traditional authorities-opposition divide and
    pits reformers against supporters of the status quo in both camps.

    And Mr. Mayilian continued, although leaders of all major political
    forces have endorsed Mr. Sahakian, many rank-and-file members, as well
    as many midlevel state officials are backing Mr. Mayilian, but are
    reluctant to do so openly.

    Mr. Mayilian's supporters have complained to the Central Election
    Commission that local officials have been hampering his campaign and
    supporting Mr. Sahakian. One Mayilian supporter in Mardakert region
    was reportedly forced to retire from his job in the state natural gas
    utility as he made his political preference public.

    Mr. Mayilian also said that all seats on central and local electoral
    commissions are controlled by appointees of the president and
    parliamentary parties that have endorsed Mr. Sahakian, and that Mr.
    Mayilian's campaign is only represented by observers.

    "I only hope that [electoral commission members] would be guided by
    state thinking and patriotism and would not approve of
    falsifications," he said, adding that he hoped "the voting and
    counting are conducted in a normal way without violations."

    ***

    A native of Stepanakert, Mr. Mayilian graduated from the local high
    school and, following mandatory army service, from the mathematics
    faculty of the local pedagogic institute in 1991.

    For about a year, Mr. Mayilian was enrolled at the Yerevan State
    University graduate school studying social psychology, but then in
    1992, as fighting raged throughout Karabakh, he decided to return to
    his hometown to work in the State Defense Committee as media liaison.

    Mr. Mayilian became one of the first staff members of Karabakh's
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs, established in 1993, and rose through the
    ranks to become deputy minister in 2001. Throughout his years at the
    ministry he was one of the key individuals representing Karabakh in
    international negotiations and is widely considered to be one of
    Karabakh's most experienced diplomats.

    Most local voters praise Mr. Mayilian as smart and incorruptible,
    but many also point to his lack of experience in running domestic
    affairs.

    -Emil Sanamyan

    **************************************** ***********************************

    7. Artsakh elects a new president

    * Here they are convinced that democracy is not optional

    by Armen Hakobyan

    STEPANAKERT, Karabakh -- Free from the aggression of Azerbaijan,
    having won the right to live in freedom and independence, but not
    recognized by the international community, the Armenians of Artsakh --
    the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh -- on July 19 elected their
    third-ever president. According to the preliminary results posted by
    the Central Electoral Commission, 87 percent of citizens voted for
    Bako Sahakian. Massis Mayilian received almost 11 percent of the vote.
    According to the chair of the Central Electoral Commission, Sergei
    Nasibian, of 92,177 registered voters, 70,235 or 76.25 percent came
    out to vote.

    A 62-year resident of Stepanakert, Aram Melkumian is convinced that
    elections, especially presidential elections, are akin to festivities.
    To prove his conviction, Aram and his friend Alexander Aghabekian
    created a rather large commotion outside polling station 4/1 at
    Stepanakert's Number 5 Middle School. The two friends greeted voters
    by playing traditional Armenian melodies on their traditional Armenian
    instruments, the dhol and the zurna. They assured us that they had
    come to play here of their own free will, without getting paid. Their
    only objective was to transmit a festive mood to their fellow
    Armenians through music. "We went to war with these instruments, why
    shouldn't we play them today when we are voting for our new
    president?" Aram asks honestly.

    It was at this very same polling station that the frontrunner, Bako
    Sahakian, came to vote. Of the other 4 candidates, Armen Abgarian,
    Vania Avanesian, Hrant Melkumian, and Masis Mayilian, only Mr.
    Mayilian was considered a contender against Mr. Sahakian.

    Mr. Mayilian came to the same polling station an hour later to cast
    his vote. During a conversation with reporters, he commented that he
    had come to vote not only in high spirits, but in a victorious mood,
    although the musicians had already gone. "I have come to vote with
    high spirits and we are waiting for victory," he said.

    * Observers give a positive assessment

    The Council of Europe and some member states have said they do not
    recognize elections in Karabakh and did not send observers. But over
    100 observers, eight of them local, monitored the election, according
    to the CEC. International observers had come from the United States,
    Russia, Ukraine, Italy, Greece, France, Serbia, Germany, and other
    countries, including Armenia.

    Two international observer groups, the Trans-European Dialogue
    Network and In the Name of Democracy and the Rights of Peoples (which
    includes the unrecognized republics of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and
    Trandniesdr; Karabakh has observer status), on the evening of July 19
    presented their preliminary assessment. These two missions stated that
    they had visited 278 polling stations, which is about 20 percent of
    all the precincts: "Based on the observations, the international
    observers came to a general consensus that the July 19 presidential
    elections in Nagorno-Karabakh comply with their national legislation
    and adhere to international standards and principles of holding
    democratic elections."

    I had the opportunity at various polling stations to talk to some of
    the observers. Grigory Marakutsa is with In the Name of Democracy and
    the Rights of Peoples. He was speaker of the Transdniestr parliament
    and has had the opportunity to observe many elections, including those
    in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. "The most important thing is for the
    people of the country to recognize the results of the elections," he
    said.

    South Ossetia's deputy speaker of parliament, Yuri Dzitsoity, said,
    "First of all, my first impression of Karabakh has nothing to do with
    the elections but rather with the all the construction going on, the
    vibrant life here, and how decrepit buildings are being torn down to
    make way for new buildings. This is a pleasant surprise for me, and
    this is perhaps the only way that the Armenians of Karabakh can prove
    their right to have an independent state.

    "And with regard to what European bureaucrats say about not
    recognizing the elections, I believe they are not being honest when
    they state that they don't recognize the elections. Elections are the
    expression of the opinion of the people, and it is not possible to
    ignore the opinion of the people. And if you disregard the people's
    opinion, then excuse me, those people have a right to disregard your
    opinion. This is the first thing," Mr. Dzitsoity continued.

    "The second point is as a result of the elections, there is an
    elected president, parliament and I think I can say that when the
    European Union, American members of Congress, and the president of the
    Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe come to have meetings,
    they meet with elected representatives. If they don't accept the
    elections, then how can they accept the results? Their statements have
    been made to accommodate Azerbaijan and Georgia. In reality they work
    with pleasure with those people who have been duly elected," Mr.
    Dzitsoity concluded.

    * The assessment of the leaders of Karabakh

    "This electoral campaign illustrated that all the candidates had equal
    opportunities," said Ashot Ghulian, Speaker of the Nagorno-Karabakh
    parliament. "Everything depended upon the ability of the individual
    candidate and how he presented his platform. As to the shortcomings of
    these elections, I don't believe than any election can be completely
    free of any shortcoming whatsoever. However these problems cannot
    affect the final outcome of the elections themselves."

    Mr. Ghulian added, "This is the path that the people of Karabakh
    have chosen, one which we will not stray from and one which is a clear
    message to the international community."

    A BBC reporter asked the incumbent president of Karabakh, Arkady
    Ghoukassian, why Karabakh bothered to hold elections that will not be
    recognized by the international community. Mr. Ghoukassian said, "We
    hold elections not for the international community, but first of all
    for ourselves, to make the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic democratic and
    thus realize the goals our people set forth in declaring independence.
    As to whether the international community recognizes or doesn't
    recognize these elections, then I wish that those who don't recognize
    the elections would propose an alternative. What should we do if not
    hold elections? What is the alternative to elections? If the people do
    not vote, then what do you do? Arkady Ghoukassian should become a
    Turkmenbashi and rule for fifty years? This is the alternative to
    elections."

    * The people's assessment

    In polling stations in and around Stepanakert, from early in the
    morning, citizens were actively coming out to vote.

    One older resident of Stepanakert showed me her Armenian passport
    and asked why a united Armenia and Artsakh needs two presidents.
    Although the vast majority of voters were asking less provocative
    questions, they were in fact concerned with the more pragmatic ones
    having to do with pensions, increases in wages, the creation of jobs,
    and solutions to other social problems. At the same time, many of the
    voters I spoke with had hope that the during the term of the new
    president, the Karabakh conflict would find its final resolution,
    Karabakh would be recognized internationally, it would have its own
    unique status, with a border linking it to Mother Armenia.

    A 64-year-old resident of Stepanakert, Hrant Harutiunian said,
    "Whether they recognize us or not, we are electing a leader for
    ourselves." His fellow Stepanakertsi Grisha Mikaelian added, " I only
    want my chosen candidate to be president."

    I asked Aram the musician whether it is possible that the new leader
    of Karabakh would concede any territory. "Don't you believe that
    anyone would concede any territory! I fought in that war. I
    participated till the end. I am disabled in the second degree. How can
    we give back the blood that we shed and say, here, take it? How are we
    going to answer to our martyrs that we conceded territory? We go to
    mutual concessions only when we know that they [Azerbaijanis] have
    withdrawn and will have nothing further to do with us." He was visibly
    shaken afterward.

    This is the overriding opinion. People have been living freely for a
    long time now in Artsakh and not only are they sure in their right to
    self-determination, they are ready to struggle till the end to protect
    what they have achieved because what they have achieved has come at an
    extremely high cost.

    ******************************************* ********************************

    8. From Armenia, in brief

    * Royal Armenia executives set free

    YEREVAN -- After nearly two years in prison, two businesspeople were
    acquitted of charges of customs fraud and have been set free. The two
    men are Gagik Hakobian, co-owner of Royal Armenia coffee importers,
    and Aram Ghazarian, who at the time of his arrest was director of
    Royal Armenia.

    The State Customs Service had filed a complaint against them after
    they went public with complaints about corruption in the Customs
    Service.

    Royal Armenia in 2005 had complained that Customs had determined the
    value of the coffee imported by them to be higher than it actually
    was, and higher than the value of coffee imported by their
    competitors. The higher value led to higher import duties. Royal
    Armenia charged that top customs officials had offered to lower the
    assessment if Royal Armenia would agree to share with them the
    consequent savings in import duties.

    Suddenly, the Customs Service announced that it had uncovered
    customs fraud on the part of Royal Armenia. The charge was presenting
    falsified invoices from supplier Vatche Petrossian, a citizen of the
    United States.

    This week, Yerevan's Kentron & Nork Marash district court found the
    charges to be baseless, acquitted the two men on all accounts, and
    ordered them freed on the spot. The court also ordered the prosecutor
    general to institute criminal proceedings against Mr. Petrossian for
    providing false testimony regarding the invoices.

    Observers noted that acquittals are exceedingly rare in Armenia's courts.

    * Armenia has a new chief tax collector

    YEREVAN -- Vahram Barseghian is the new head of Armenia's State Tax
    Service, the main tax-collection agency. He was appointed by President
    Kocharian on July 16. Mr. Barseghian's former position was running the
    president's Oversight Service, an agency whose responsibilities are to
    track irregularities and corruption within different government
    bodies. In this position he uncovered various problems, including
    fraud in the earthquake zone and customs fraud relating to
    mobile-phone imports.

    Mr. Barseghian replaces Felix Tsolakian, who came to the job four
    years ago from the same position as head of the Oversight Service. Mr.
    Tsolakian will now serve as a presidential advisor.

    The government recently launched a plan of legislative and
    administrative measures aimed at raising tax revenues over the next
    several years. Although Armenia's tax revenues have shown steady
    growth, tax evasion is widespread.

    * USAID and EBRD assist small and medium enterprises in Armenia

    YEREVAN -- On July 16, Ambassador Rudolf Perina, charge d'affaires ad
    interim at the U.S. Embassy in Armenia signed an agreement between the
    U.S. Agency for International Development and the European Bank for
    Reconstruction and Development. This agreement was signed in support
    of EBRD's Turn Around Management and Business Advisory Services
    (TAM/BAS) and will provide $1.64 million in funding.

    USAID's contribution consists of 74 per cent of the funding; EBRD
    will provide $0.5 million, or approximately 26 percent of the total.
    Within the framework of this three-year program, it is expected that a
    minimum of 180 projects will be undertaken, with the focus on
    Armenia's rural and less-developed areas.

    The main goals of this program are twofold: first, it is to assist
    small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in their business development;
    second, it is to support the professional development of local
    business consulting companies. BAS has been functioning in Armenia
    since May 2003 with the financial assistance of the European Union,
    EBRD, Canada International Development Agency (CIDA), and Taiwan.

    The regional director of BAS, Natalia Melyounas, informed the
    Armenian Reporter that of those 389 small and medium businesses that
    previously participated in the program, only 8 percent were deemed to
    have had poor results, while 53 percent were considered to be
    excellent, and the rest were qualified as satisfactory.

    The private sector in Armenia is short on financial resources and
    management, and BAS program can have a significant impact in this
    area, Ms. Melyounas said. Turnover of enterprises is expected to rise
    by 10 percent and jobs by 20 percent or 5-10 new jobs per enterprise.
    An increase in production by 10-15 percent is also foreseen, as is the
    introduction of new methods of market management, and the anticipated
    positive effect of increased health and safety of employees.

    Mr. Perina welcomed this new level of cooperation between USAID and
    EBRD, emphasizing that this three-year program will help to increase
    the number of SMEs in Armenia's rural and poor areas and will assist
    in improving business productivity and turnover. "During the last
    twenty years, 70 percent of jobs in the United Sates have been created
    by SMEs. The same can be realized in Armenia because the best chance
    Armenia has of creating jobs is through small and medium enterprises."

    ****************************** *********************************************

    9. Two sides of Yerevan urbanism

    * Construction at Tamanyan Park and by Swan Lake

    by Karen Mikaelian (NOVOE VREMYA)

    YEREVAN -- Construction started simultaneously in two popular
    locations in Yerevan. Both building sites are hidden from curious
    eyes. One is located at the foot of the Cascade and the other by the
    Swan Lake. In both cases, the citizens of Yerevan are seriously
    concerned.

    A section of Tamanyan Park, from Moskovian Street to Isahakian
    Street, is fenced in with aluminum plates. The well-groomed emerald
    lawn was removed and digging is underway. Rumors are rampant that
    there is going to be some sort of construction. However, the rumors do
    not correspond to reality. The administration of the Cafesjian Museum
    Foundation (CMF) is making improvements to the park although by
    Yerevan (and not only Yerevan) standards, the park was already ideal.
    Nowhere else in Yerevan can you find so many well-groomed flowerbeds
    and lawns as in Tamanyan Park. Apparently this was not good enough for
    the CMF. Along with the construction of the Cafesjian Center for the
    Arts, Tamanyan Park and the whole Cascade will change gradually and a
    new park will be built.

    "There is no reason for residents of Yerevan to be concerned.
    Tamanyan Park will be transformed into an even more attractive and
    beautiful place," said Edward Balassanian, Executive Director of the
    CMF. "It will become an organic part of the Cascade and of the future
    museum. It will in a sense set the stage for ascending the steps, for
    approaching the museum and the exhibition halls on the landings of the
    Cascade. Construction will be carried out in two phases so as not to
    prevent people from visiting the park. First we will renovate the
    underground communications beneath the park -- storm sewages,
    electrical cables, water pipes, etc. They are worn out and will be
    totally replaced."

    Architect David Hotson, the designer of the museum, proposed
    construction of stone podiums and pedestals along both sides of the
    park to support large sculptures from the Cafesjian collection. Some
    of these sculptures are already on exhibit in various locations on the
    Cascade. They will be gathered in one place, in the park. Comfortable
    benches will be built from travertine stone with wooden seats. In
    addition, steles will be erected to serve as billboards and
    information guides to all events in the exhibition halls and the
    museum, to advertise current programs, exhibitions, etc. The pools and
    fountains will undergo fundamental reconstruction. According to Mr.
    Balassanian, they will be fitted with colorful lights, and their
    design, as well as the overall illumination of the park, will comply
    with modern European and American standards and tastes.

    Naturally, the greenery will also change. "No tree or bush will be
    ruined. New ones will appear. And more flowers will be planted," Mr.
    Balassanian promised. The most interesting and unexpected innovation
    will be the total absence of commercial influences: no cafes and
    tasteless music. There were two freestanding buildings on the park;
    Gerard Cafesjian purchased them and had them dismantled, affording
    people a unique opportunity to simply stroll and rest in the vicinity
    of sculptures, in the green, the light, and the open air, and among
    peaceful and urbane fellow citizens. The foundation intends to
    complete the initial phase in October and start the reconstruction of
    the central part of the park next year. It will become the largest
    municipal improvement project in the city.

    There is no reason to doubt that the job will be accomplished and,
    as they said in the Soviet era, "in good time and quality." Mr.
    Cafesjian has so far fulfilled all his promises. The Cascade has been
    transformed as if by magic. It is pointless to recall the variety of
    unfair arguments and accusations, invectives and reproaches about why
    an "odar" should become the owner of the Cascade. Today it is
    impossible to imagine what would have happened to the park and the
    Cascade had Mr. Cafesjian not acquired the site. Most definitely, all
    kinds of buildings would have been erected, music would be blaring,
    the escalators would have rusted away, and numerous villas and
    commercial enterprises would have appeared in the surroundings. And
    there would be dirt, withered greenery, and dilapidated fountains.
    Where are those critics today, and what do they think (if they ever
    think) while strolling along Cafesjian's "estates"? As a result of an
    actually profitable transaction, the Treasury got richer, people got
    work, and people can enjoy blissful strolls in the park.

    ***

    The second construction site is located by the Swan Lake, parallel
    to Tumanian Street. In the past, there was a grass crocodile, made by
    someone who liked to sculpt shrubbery. Then, all of a sudden a cafe
    appeared, causing a storm of public protest. The cafe was overgrown
    with climbing vines, which made the view a bit less dreadful. In the
    spring the ownership changed and things began to take off. The cafe
    with its picturesque climbing vines was dismantled and digging began.
    In a couple of days, excavators dug a huge hole and then they simply
    vanished. The hole, currently surrounded with plastic, is 5 to 6
    meters deep; it is right by the statue of Arno Babajanian. No
    information about the construction is posted for the public, and it is
    unknown what is being built.

    The name of the new owner is also a secret, but that is not the
    point. The point is that Mister X most likely intends to build
    something fundamental. The public, including the architectural
    community is at a loss. The foundation pit is large and obviously for
    the purpose of building something starting underground. What will be
    on the surface? Most probably something monstrous. Even if it is a
    glass cube or a different figure (which is totally unbelievable), it
    will obviously mutilate the surroundings once and for all -- the lake,
    the Northern Avenue block, etc.

    There is no other obvious option. After all, if even the former
    small cafe with abundant greenery blocked the view of the lake, what
    should we expect from a six-meter deep ditch? Sources say that the
    City Council has neither considered nor approved the project at all.
    It appears that the long-lasting intensive talks and discussions with
    regard to numerous building sites surrounding the Opera House were
    just soap bubbles, a lot of hot air. We thought then -- that's it, let
    bygones be bygones, we are starting a new life and no new construction
    will appear around the long-suffering masterpiece of Alexander
    Tamanyan [who drew up the plans for Yerevan in the 1920s]. But we were
    mistaken.

    So, on the one hand we have Gerard Cafesjian -- an American
    philanthropist, who has undertaken to bring the Cascade and the park
    into civilized shape and construct the Center for the Arts. On the
    other hand we have a local tycoon who most probably lacks not only
    civic consciousness and love toward the Armenian metropolis, but also
    taste. Perhaps public indignation and resentment is baseless, and the
    owner will build something invisible and subterranean, like a cavern
    with a manhole entry and covered with grass? I wish I were mistaken.
    However, even a most iniquitous ditch is never covered up in our city.
    Therefore, it is hopeless. So, they will build whatever they wish:
    another multifunctional object.

    * * *

    Originally published in NOVOE VREMYA on July 10, 2007. Reprinted with
    permission.

    ******************************** *******************************************

    10. Market update

    by Haik Papian

    A. Rates

    The yield-to-maturity curve has an upward slope. The shape of the
    curve has been almost the same for the last three months. In contrast,
    the forward-rate curve shows volatility, especially in the
    long-maturity segment, which can be explained by recent changes in
    spot rates. Spot rates for bonds with 7-year maturity decreased (to
    5.5220 from 6.0284) and for bonds with 10 year-maturity, spot rates
    increased (to 6.2012 from 5.6521).

    The diagram shows the exchange-rate fluctuations for AMD/USD and
    AMD/EUR currency pairs. The base day is June 12.

    The exchange-rate quotation is presented in European terms, and the
    percentage decrease or increase in the diagram means appreciation or
    depreciation of Armenian dram.

    From June 12 to July 13, the Armenian dram was appreciating against
    both the euro and the U.S. dollar. In the reporting period, the euro
    appreciated about 0.78 percent and the dollar depreciated about 2.39
    percent. As opposed to the last period (May 15-June 11) the pace of
    Armenian dram appreciation against the euro went down from about 4
    percent to almost zero, and against the dollar remained almost the
    same.

    B. Corporate securities

    The spreads maintained on the exchange for corporate bonds remained
    approximately the same on average:

    * Ararat Bank (10 months before maturity): Bid 8.05%; Ask 7.90%

    * Cascade Credit (3 months before maturity): Bid 5.20%; Ask 4.70%

    Ararat Bank notes turnover exceeded 36 percent of the whole issue in
    secondary trading.

    C. Indexes

    Cascade Business Sentiment Index (CBSI): The Cascade Business
    Sentiment Index is our approach to forecasting sentiment about
    Armenia's business trends. The Sentiment Index is based on a survey,
    the respondents of which are a group of individuals who own or operate
    stable and growing businesses in Armenia. The survey measures the
    business owners' expectations for the near future by addressing to
    them questions and calculating the weighted average of their replies
    on a numerical scale (from 1, the most pessimistic, to 10, the most
    optimistic). The Cascade Business Sentiment Index for the month of
    July 2007 is 6.5, which is a 1.5 percent decrease over the last month.
    This decrease can be explained by an anticipation of overall demand
    decrease during the summer period. In addition because of Armenian
    dram appreciation, many people prefer to spend their vacations outside
    of Armenia, which puts additional pressure on service providers'
    expectations.

    Cascade Commodity Index (CCI): The index, which is the average
    retail price in Armenia for certain commodities, has seen a monthly
    increase in the last few months. The Cascade Commodity Index for
    June-July 2007 is 15160. No increase was observed in the last month.
    The commodities tracked by the index are (1) petroleum (20 liters);
    (2) steel (100 kg); (3) pork (10 kg); (4) flour (10 kg); (5) corn oil
    (10 liters).

    D. Major Market Events

    Cascade Investments placed 1 billion AMD of ArmRusgazprom CJSC coupon
    bonds. This was the largest corporate fixed-income security placement
    ever done in Armenia. Securities have semiannual 4.5 percent coupon
    payments and mature after 18 months. Bonds were placed at par 10,000
    AMD. A total of 31 investors bought the issue. The buyers were legal
    entities and physical persons. ArmRusgazprom CJSC was founded in
    December 1997. The owners of ArmRusgazprom are Gazprom OJSC, Russia,
    57.59 percent of share capital; the Ministry of Energy of the
    Republic of Armenia, 34.7 percent of share capital; and Itera
    International, Ltd., a U.S.-based concern, 7.71 percent of share
    capital.

    ArmRusgazprom CJSC is engaged in the distribution of natural gas to
    customers in Armenia. The company has monopolistic right to import
    gas, to operate distribution system, and to sell gas to residential
    and industrial customers. The company has 17 branches in Yerevan and
    16 in the regions (marzes) of Armenia as well as an engineering center
    branch in Yerevan. ArmRusgazprom CJSC has 5,546 employees.

    * * *

    Haik Papian, CFA, is CEO of Cascade Investments. He can be reached at
    [email protected]. For charts, see the print version of
    the newspaper or the pdf version at reporter.am

    ************************************* **************************************

    11. Living in Armenia: With home ownership comes a sense of belonging

    by Maria Titizian

    Buying a home can be a daunting and emotional journey for most of us.
    So many hopes and dreams are tied up into owning a home, especially
    when it's your first one: "This is where we'll build a life for
    ourselves, raise our children, plant a vegetable garden, and grow old
    together." More than a real estate transaction, buying a house is a
    commitment, not only to the bank, but to our concept of family. Owning
    your own home is an intrinsic part of the American dream and according
    to the U.S. Census Bureau almost 70 percent of Americans own their own
    homes.

    There's the minor issue of getting approved for a mortgage, however,
    making sure monthly payments can be made, buying garden tools, patio
    furniture, and for those living in the northern reaches of our
    hemisphere, most definitely the purchase of shovels or snow blowers.

    However for any real Armenian family, the most important and
    critical piece of furniture is the barbecue. My husband comes from a
    village, so a gas barbecue was out of the question. I was raised in
    the city therefore a tonir was out of the question. We settled on a
    large, custom-made wood-burning barbecue, which saw its share of
    family get-togethers and quiet Saturday evenings when the sun was
    setting, and the smell of the wood burning and the aroma of the food
    would alleviate any or all of the previous week's angst and tension.

    A sense of ownership is not enough, though. One needs to have a
    sense of belonging as well. For most of my life, I always felt like I
    never belonged. I never belonged among my blue-eyed, blonde-haired
    friends, who used to live in pretty houses on even prettier streets in
    neighborhoods where I could never have dreamed of living. Back in the
    early 70s, Canada was not home to many immigrants, and the "visible
    minorities" in my Grade 1 class were an Arab, a Jew, and me.

    So there I was, a dark-eyed, dark-haired quiet little girl who lived
    in an over-store apartment, usually infested with large black
    cockroaches; my fair-skinned friends went to music class or dance
    class and all lived in houses with neatly trimmed backyards, where
    they could play. I recall walking home from school one day and seeing
    a "For Sale" sign on the front garden of a brick bungalow. I stood
    there gazing wistfully at that house and feeling like Francie Nolan
    from A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. How I wanted to live in that house! I
    ran home and told my mother excitedly about this wonderful fairytale
    house that was for sale and could we please, please buy it. Only
    decades later did I realize the pain I must have caused my mother back
    then, an immigrant with no education, no family, and no money in the
    bank. All I remember of her reaction is her face slowly turning away
    from me.

    So when I moved into my first house, modest as it was, my dream was
    still the house on the street with the "For Sale" sign that I, as a
    little girl of 8 or 9 had seen. The house we bought was the house
    where we raised our children, planted a vegetable garden, had
    barbecues, and eventually decided to sell to move to Armenia.

    Home ownership in Armenia, however, has taken on a new meaning for
    me. We bought a home here in Yerevan because we were going to be
    living here. Lately many of our friends who live in different parts of
    the world are buying homes in Armenia. I have had the privilege and
    utter comic relief of watching these people that I love go through the
    very difficult process of having a home in the homeland. Most of these
    friends, I wish to make clear, will not be living in Armenia
    permanently now or even in the foreseeable future.

    Owning a home in Armenia allows them the freedom to come and go, to
    have a foothold in a place they have claimed for themselves, to leave
    perhaps a legacy to their children by enabling them to dig and
    discover their roots. But with all this lovely imagery comes the
    reality of dealing with builders who are constantly behind schedule,
    contractors who don't show up, entire paint crews who are off the job
    for days because their cousin's sister-in-law's 88-year-old mother
    passed away in Gyumri and they must go to the funeral.

    I hope the reader takes what I am about to say with a grain of salt,
    but my American-Armenian friends are the funniest. One particular
    friend, who will remain nameless, had this notion that there must be a
    department store-like place which sells home supplies and that we
    would have a cart and go aisle by aisle to find all the things he
    needed for his newly finished apartment. On the way to this imaginary
    place I was trying hard to control my laughter.

    Where we were going in fact was a narrow, dusty street located just
    behind the statue of Vartan Mamigonian on his horse, arms
    outstretched, ready for battle. Not unlike the frame of mind we needed
    to be in to survive this shopping expedition. The street, which is
    overcrowded with cars and people, is home to about 10 or 12 small
    shops lined together selling everything from light switches to laundry
    detergent. There are no carts, no salespeople to assist you, and most
    importantly no air conditioning in any of these specialty stores. We
    ended up making 4 or 5 trips to the car to unload the stuff he bought,
    and at the end of it we were both exhausted. Once in the car, with the
    air conditioning on at maximum, I turned to him and said, "Welcome to
    Armenia!" I don't think he was amused.

    And then there's the issue of quality control in newly constructed
    apartment buildings. Another friend, shortly after moving into his
    apartment, discovered that two of his three sinks were leaking and a
    rather large crack had formed on the wall that separated his two
    bedrooms. In the laundry room, the crew that had tiled the walls had
    failed to bring the tiles all the way down to the floor. When my
    friend complained that there was a 3 inch space between the floor and
    the tile on the walls, the varbed (master) said, "Well, just close the
    door and you won't see it." This is the kind of answer you're likely
    to get 9 out of 10 times.

    Much as I find it humorous to see my friends in distress and
    frustrated, I am sincerely happy for them because in Armenia with a
    sense of ownership comes the sense of belonging. So whether their sink
    is leaking or there's a crack in the wall, or the slim possibility
    that the uneven flow of electricity might end up damaging all their
    appliances (a piece of information I have yet to impart to them), I
    hope that this sense of belonging will overshadow all the other
    shortcomings of owning a home in Armenia.

    **************************************** ***********************************

    12. Commentary: Doublespeak and double standards -- over democracy in
    Karabakh

    by Tatul Hakobyan

    YEREVAN -- The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group on July 14 issued a
    joint statement to give their "assessment of the emerging situation in
    the settlement process for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in light of
    the recent meeting" between President Robert Kocharian of Armenia and
    Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan in St. Petersburg.

    The mediators stated that the presidents could not overcome their
    remaining differences. "Thus, the two sides are approaching 2008 -- a
    year of presidential elections in both Armenia and Azerbaijan, when,
    as past experience shows, chances for progress will likely be
    overshadowed by the electoral campaigns. Without an endorsement of the
    basic principles at the presidential level, it is impossible to start
    drafting the text of an agreement on the peaceful settlement of the
    conflict, or to secure the progress of the past three years of
    negotiations in order not to re-open them from scratch whenever they
    resume again," the statement reads.

    Referring to the recent visit of a group of prominent figures, led
    by the ambassadors of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Moscow, to Karabakh,
    Armenia, and Azerbaijan, the co-chairs said "the conflicting sides
    showed their ability to create more favorable conditions for preparing
    their public opinion for peace."

    The co-chairs went on to express concern about several current
    developments that, in their view, "do not contribute to preparation of
    the populations for peace." Obviously, and quite appropriately, they
    specifically cited "militaristic statements threatening use of force
    and creating the dangerous illusion that war is an option for
    resolution of the conflict."

    Such statements have been coming from Azerbaijan alone.

    * Condemning democracy

    Surprisingly, the statement by the co-chairs of the Minsk Group of the
    Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe also cites "the
    upcoming so-called presidential elections in Nagorno-Karabakh," saying
    that the elections "have already caused an increase in tensions." The
    co-chairs continue: "Recalling their statements with respect to
    previous votings in Nagorno-Karabakh, the co-chairs reiterate that,
    like all other members of the international community, their countries
    do not recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent state, and such
    'elections' should not have any impact on the peaceful settlement of
    the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict."

    All previous elections in Nagorno-Karabakh -- presidential,
    parliamentary, or local -- have likewise gone unrecognized, and some
    have even been condemned by OSCE and by other European organizations
    like the European Union or Council of Europe. These multilateral
    institutions have sometimes been joined by individual countries
    including Azerbaijan and Turkey, the officials of Russia and the
    United States, and sometimes Georgia, the Ukraine, and France.

    Azerbaijan's and Turkey's position is obvious and does not lend
    itself to further analysis. OSCE's position with respect to the
    elections in Karabakh, however, is incomprehensible. On March 24,
    1992, OSCE (at the time CSCE) drew up its first position paper on the
    Karabakh conflict. This position paper clearly states that
    negotiations were to take place between Armenia and Azerbaijan, but
    also with the participation of elected officials and other authorities
    from Nagorno-Karabakh.

    By "elected officials," CSCE meant the first elected parliament of
    Nagorno-Karabakh, whose president was Artur Mktchian. That body was
    elected on December 28, 1991. By "other authorities" CSCE referred to
    the Azerbaijani community whose leader was Shushi's mayor, Nizami
    Bahmanov. At the time, CSCE was utilizing and clearly distinguishing
    the terms "elected" and "other" because the government in
    Nagorno-Karabakh was elected by the people, whereas Nizami Bahmanov,
    who was representing the executive branch of his government, was
    appointed to his position by Baku.

    It was the same organization on whose behalf the Minsk Group was
    formed, and whose then-president, Deputy Foreign Minister Mario
    Rafaeli of Italy, insisted that the Karabakh delegation participate in
    the negotiations that began in the summer of 1992 in Rome. The
    Karabakh delegation did not participate in the first two meetings in
    Rome out of protest: the delegates had been invited as the elected
    officials of the Armenian community of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the
    Azerbaijanis, who were appointed, were considered to have the same
    status. It was only on Yerevan's insistence that the Karabakh
    delegation -- comprised of members of parliament Boris Aroushanian,
    Robert Kocharian, and Hrant Khachatrian -- finally participated in the
    subsequent three negotiation meetings in Rome.

    From that time until April 1997, Karabakh's elected officials have
    participated in all the negotiations as a separate side, whereas the
    Azerbaijani community of Nagorno-Karabakh has participated in the
    negotiations only as part of Azerbaijan's delegation.

    * "So called" logic

    If the OSCE truly does not recognize the results of the elections, or
    genuinely considers them "so-called," then why is it that the
    co-chairs of the Minsk Group, the chairman-in-office of OSCE, and the
    special representative of the European Union in the South Caucasus
    have all met either in Stepanakert or in Yerevan with the
    representatives of the elected leaders of Nagorno-Karabakh? Mario
    Rafaeli in 1992 and 1993 visited Stepanakert at least 10 times and met
    with Artur Mkrtchian and then Georgi Petrosian, because they were the
    legally elected speakers of the parliament.

    To label the elections as "so-called," or to outright denounce them
    or refuse to recognize them, requires that one must also criticize the
    May 1994 Bishkek peace agreement. Not only did the Speakers of
    Armenia's and Azerbaijan's parliaments, Ararktsian and Guliev, sign
    that agreement, but the speaker of Nagorno-Karabakh's parliament,
    Karen Baburian, also signed it as an equal. A few days later in
    Moscow, when the ceasefire agreement was drawn up, again the defense
    ministers of the three sides, as equals, signed it: Serge Sargsian
    from Armenia, Mamedrafi Mamedov from Azerbaijan, and Samvel Babayan
    from Karabakh.

    By the same logic, OSCE should criticize its own 1994 summit in
    Budapest. That's right: OSCE should criticize an OSCE meeting, because
    this summit recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as one of the sides in the
    Karabakh conflict. And who represents this side? Obviously, its
    elected officials, the parliament and the government. Alternatively,
    with whom would the international community communicate?

    Local warlords, perhaps? Luckily, there are no such warlords in
    Nagorno-Karabakh.

    At one time Moscow, through representatives of its foreign ministry,
    would denounce the elections in Nagorno-Karabakh, while in the case of
    Chechnya it would negotiate with Chechen warlords: Jokhar Dudayev,
    Shamil Basayev, Aslan Maskhadov. It's true, however, that Russia later
    labeled them as terrorists and eliminated them -- along with tens of
    thousands of peaceful Chechens.

    On the one hand, OSCE says it does not recognize Nagorno-Karabakh
    and its duly elected government; and on the other hand it has
    presented its three written proposals on the settlement of the
    conflict to official Stepanakert. In the fall of 1997, the OSCE Minsk
    Group presented to the three sides in the conflict the second "phased"
    settlement proposal, because a few months earlier the Minsk Group's
    first, "package" settlement proposal was refused by the elected
    representatives of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    The Minsk Group in late 1998 accepted with pleasure the documents
    through which the Foreign Ministry of NKR gave its agreement to the
    third written proposal, that of a "common state."

    On some level, it might be understandable if the international
    community were not to accept or recognize presidential or
    parliamentary elections in Nagorno-Karabakh, on the grounds that
    ethnic Azerbaijanis don't participate in them. There were 30,000
    ethnic Azerbaijanis in Karabakh in 1992. It should be obvious to
    everyone, however, that today it is impossible for the Azerbaijanis of
    Nagorno-Karabakh to participate in the elections, just as it was
    impossible for the 200,000 Armenians who were in Baku back then to
    participate in Azerbaijan's presidential elections.

    And the criticism would not be limited to presidential elections. It
    should extend to parliamentary elections and even local ones. The
    village of Talish in Martakert is more than a thousand years old and
    has more residents than the Council of Europe or the OSCE have
    members. By the critics' logic, they should not be able to choose a
    village head to administer their collective affairs.

    In criticizing Nagorno-Karabakh for holding elections, the
    international community notes that the future status of
    Nagorno-Karabakh has yet to be determined. But the status of
    Nagorno-Karabakh has been undetermined for the last 20 years. I have
    looked at the statements of the international community, and have not
    seen a single proposal as to what Nagorno-Karabakh should do in that
    20-year "meanwhile" leading up to official "determination."

    * The priority of legitimacy

    Until the status is determined, perhaps the international community
    might avoid using the title "president" for the elected head of state
    of Nagorno-Karabakh, and use a neutral title like "leader" instead.
    But it would disgrace its own commitment to democracy to denounce the
    act of choosing. In a broader sense, it's not important whether they
    say "Leader" or "President"; what is important is that that the Leader
    or President be recognized as legitimate -- and that requires fair and
    free elections.

    Recently, while in Strasbourg, I suggested to the Secretary General
    of the Council of Europe, Terry Davis, and his deputy that the
    Council's language about the values of democracy, when it comes to
    unrecognized states, is more incomprehensible than the language used
    by Georgia when it comes to Abkhazia. For example, the authorities in
    Tbilisi and the Georgian media very often call the president of
    Abkhazia, Sergei Bagapsh, the de facto president of Abkhazia -- a
    relatively neutral designation despite their obvious animosity to that
    position. Meanwhile, the Council of Europe and OSCE have labeled the
    leader of Abkhazia a separatist, which has a clearly negative
    connotation.

    It was the same Council of Europe that in 1994 organized hearings on
    the theme of a settlement for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and sent
    formal invitations to the speakers of parliament of the three
    countries, including Karen Baburian.

    Democracy must be an absolute value, regardless of where it is
    realized. For example, why should the elections held in Saudi Arabia
    or Pakistan or Turkmenistan be considered legitimate when the
    elections in those countries are farcical?

    International organizations and countries condemn the fair and free
    elections in Karabakh, but they use even more stern vocabulary when
    elections in unrecognized countries are corrupt and criminal elements
    come to power. For example, high-level Americans have announced that
    in Southern Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Transdniestr criminal regimes have
    come to power. The international community was tripping over itself
    during the last presidential elections in Abkhazia, when it took them
    two months to count a few thousand ballots, only so as to avoid having
    Sergei Bagapsh become president.

    * The most painful reality

    Of course, there is the understanding in Nagorno-Karabakh that in the
    modern world, values such as democracy, the protection of human
    rights, the rule of law, legitimate statehood, free and fair
    elections, and reforms are priorities. However, when Nagorno-Karabakh
    constantly hears condemnations of its elections, and when elections
    are the first and most important element of democracy, then the common
    citizen becomes disillusioned with both democracy and with democratic
    nations. This is the most painful reality of all.

    Nagorno-Karabakh has almost always answered those organizations and
    countries that condemn the elections. Foreign Minister Georgi
    Petrosian analysed the announcements of high-level employees at the
    Council of Europe in this way:

    "It arouses regret that the representatives of the Council of Europe
    -- the organization which is intended to protect and propagate the
    ideals and principles of pluralistic democracy, human rights, and the
    supremacy of law by means of integrative processes -- should censure
    the holding of elections. In this way they cast doubt on the
    institution of elections itself as an important element of democracy,
    which contradicts the CoE charter. And if European officials don't
    want to contribute to the democratic processes in the Nagorno-Karabakh
    Republic, then we have the right to expect that they, at least, won't
    impede the strengthening of democratic institutes in our republic. We
    are deeply convinced that democratization is an important precondition
    for the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, since democracy
    presupposes the creation of mechanisms that allow solving any conflict
    exclusively in a peaceful way. That is what the Nagorno-Karabakh
    Republic is striving for. It would be natural if the representatives
    of various European structures shared this aspiration."

    Ashot Ghulian, the speaker of the parliament of Nagorno-Karabakh,
    commenting on Terry Davis' recent statements, deemed them to be
    unconstructive.

    "We should be reminded that elections are a direct indication of a
    people's will, and a basic manifestation of democracy," he commented.
    "The people of NKR and the whole civilized world are interested in
    developing democratic institutions, and the level of development,
    fortunately, is not defined by the subjective opinion of Terry Davis.
    Testimony to this lies in the experience of elections in the
    Nagorno-Karabakh Republic -- which could serve as an example for some
    countries that have seen changes of power in a manner inconsistent
    with generally accepted international principles. Certain
    representatives of international organizations and political circles,
    according to their opinions, are apparently not concerned with the
    development of positive processes in the region. But I do not think
    that they would prefer chaos and illegality"

    ******************************** *******************************************

    13. Editorial: Karabakh votes (again)

    On Thursday the people of Karabakh went to the polls and chose their
    new president. The election was hard fought. Both the president-elect,
    Bako Sahakian, and the runner-up, Masis Mayilian, were serious
    contenders: competent, well-respected, and well-liked. They differed
    in their approaches to significant socioeconomic and administrative
    matters. But both of them, and indeed the people of Karabakh, are
    unwavering in their commitment to their republic's security and
    continued democratic existence.

    Mr. Sahakian will take from President Arkady Ghoukassian the reins
    of a stable state with a growing economy. Nonetheless, he will face
    some difficult ongoing challenges.

    First among the challenges is national security. Karabakh's eastern
    neighbor, Azerbaijan, waged war against it and was defeated. Now
    Karabakh lives with constant threats of renewed war from Azerbaijan.
    It also lives with pressure to make dangerous concessions to
    Azerbaijan.

    The new president knows that he must resist concessions that will
    endanger the people of Karabakh and their hard-won statehood, while
    continuing to work in good faith and agreeing to compromises to
    achieve an internationally recognized "final status" for Karabakh.
    This he will no doubt do.

    As we have argued in this space before, Karabakh's security requires
    a concerted effort to see population growth across the republic. This
    is the second of the great challenges facing the new president. This
    effort requires educational and economic opportunities as well as a
    campaign to attract Armenians to move to this beautiful land. We trust
    that the new president will lead such a campaign.

    Creating economic opportunities is the third of the great challenges
    facing Mr. Sahakian. Good administration and avoiding corrupt
    practices is the president's role and responsibility.

    But Armenian-Americans have an essential role and responsibility as well.

    Many of us are in a position to help bring income and investment to
    Karabakh. Some Armenian-Americans will visit Karabakh; others will
    invest directly in the country; others will arrange meetings between
    Karabakh officials and foreign business leaders; yet others will
    organize or attend events -- commercial, cultural, athletic, academic,
    and political -- in the republic. Each of these steps, and others,
    will help Karabakh realize its potential and flourish.

    ***

    The right of the people to determine their own destiny, the right to
    self-determination, has been the cornerstone of Karabakh's successful
    independence movement. It is a right the people of Karabakh take very
    seriously. Some newly formed states founder in their stated commitment
    to democracy. Not so Karabakh, to the enormous credit of its people,
    its war veterans, and its elected leaders.

    The secretariat of the Council of Europe and the OSCE Minsk Group
    co-chairs (the international mediators for the Karabakh conflict) have
    quite bizarrely criticized Karabakh for holding elections.

    "What am I supposed to do?" asked an exasperated President
    Ghoukassian on Election Day. "Become a Turkmenbashi and rule for fifty
    years?" he said referring to the late President for Life of
    Turkmenistan.

    "It arouses regret that the representatives of the Council of Europe
    -- the organization which is intended to protect and propagate the
    ideals and principles of pluralistic democracy, human rights, and the
    supremacy of law by means of integrative processes -- should censure
    the holding of elections," Karabakh's foreign minister, Georgi
    Petrosian quite reasonably noted.

    He added: "If European officials don't want to contribute to the
    democratic processes in the NKR, then we have the right to expect that
    they, at least, won't impede the strengthening of democratic
    institutes in our republic. We are deeply convinced that
    democratization is an important precondition for the settlement of the
    Karabakh conflict, since democracy presupposes the creation of
    mechanisms that allow solving any conflict exclusively in a peaceful
    way. That is what the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is striving for. It
    would be natural if the representatives of various European structures
    shared this aspiration."

    It is sad that the leaders of Europe and the representatives of
    France, Russia, and the United States who co-chair the Minsk Group
    need Karabakh officials to remind them of the importance of democracy
    -- just as it is pleasing that Karabakh has earned that right through
    its steadfast commitment to democracy.

    And it is not only logic that dictates that Karabakh should hold
    elections. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes the
    right of people to vote no matter "the political, jurisdictional or
    international status of the country or territory to which a person
    belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under
    any other limitation of sovereignty."

    As we welcome Bako Sahakian to the presidency, we also thank Arkady
    Ghoukassian for his ten years' stewardship of the Nagorno-Karabakh
    Republic. Let us give Mr. Ghoukassian the last word on this matter:
    "We hold elections not for the international community, but first of
    all for ourselves, to make the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic democratic
    and thus realize the goals our people set forth in declaring
    independence."

    ******************* ************************************************** ******

    Please send your news to [email protected] and your letters to
    [email protected]

    (c) 2007 CS Media Enterprises LLC. All Rights Reserved
Working...
X