Tweet
GEORGIA: THE EVACUATION OF THE RUSSIAN MILITARY BASE AT AKHALKALAKI COMES TO A CLOSE
By Nicolas Landru in Tbilissi
Translated by Kathryn Gaylord-Miles
Caucaz.com, Georgia
May 30 2007
The Russian military base at Akhalkalaki, in Javakheti, must close its
doors in the autumn of 2008. These are the terms of the Russo-Georgian
agreement of March 31, 2005, between Salome Zourabishvili, then the
Georgian Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Sergey Lavrov, her Russian
counterpart. However, the predictions of a turbulent closing have
not come true. According to the base commanders, on July 1st 2007,
it will be returned to Georgian authorities. The final phase of the
base closure has already started: On April 13th, 2007, the last of
the equipment left Akhalkalaki to be transferred to the base in Gyumri
in Armenia. On the 19th, the equipment left Georgian territory.
The days of the remaining 3000 servicemen, Russians and local Armenians
are numbered. They are waiting for the official closing; meanwhile,
the base remains half empty. The convoy of a dozen trucks containing
five high-tension generators, five tons of munitions and 1.5 tons of
various pieces of equipment, puts an end to the transfer of materials
from Akhalkalaki to Gyumri. Personnel will be redeployed to Armenia
and Russia after the base's closure.
Akhalkalaki is the penultimate of four Russian bases in Georgia to
officially close its doors. The beginning of its evacuation sounds
the death knell of the Russian military presence in the country. This
unravelling is not simple: the question of the retreat of Russian
troops from Georgia had been one of the major stumbling blocks in
Russo-Georgian relations for more than fifteen years. Successive
governments in Tbilisi have fiercely fought for the departure of the
Russian army. On Moscow's part, distortion and vagueness have given
the impression that no guarantee has been given, and that until
the last Russian soldier has left Georgian soil, nothing has been
finalized. This ambivalent attitude, in addition to the ambiguous
role Moscow has played in the separatist conflicts in Georgia, is in
contrast to Tbilisi's uncompromising position.
Tbilisi, Gudauta, Batumi
At the heart of the growing tensions between the two countries,
Tbilisi obtained the closing of the base at Vaziani, near Tbilisi, in
2001 after two years of diplomatic combat. OSCE threats made Moscow
bend. Moscow officially loosened its position and now accepts the
closing of the base at Gudauta, situated in the Abkhazian separatist
territory. But the role this base plays in the Abkhazia conflict-it
gave asylum to the first separatist president, Ardzinba, then gave
military support to Abkhazian forces-gives the impression that it
was closed only on paper. No inspection of the premises has been
authorized for international organizations, and Tbilisi suspects
illegal use of the base by joint Russian and Abkhazian forces.
That leaves the bases in Batumi and Akhalkalaki. The political quagmire
of the second presidential term of Shevardnadze has put the Georgian
successes on hold in the second half of the 1990s. After the Rose
Revolution, the confrontation with Moscow has been more direct and
Mikheil Saakashvili's government has made the departure of all Russian
forces one of its major goals.
The "coup of Ajaria" in the summer of 2004 restored the Ajarian
Autonomous Republic under Tbilisi's control. As a result, pressure
intensified on the base at Batumi and it became a more direct threat
to Tbilisi's authority. After heated negotiations, Georgia won, first
with an evacuation agreement in 2005, then with a final agreement
on March 31, 2006, fixing a hand-over for the end of 2008 for both
Batumi and Akhalkalaki.
It seems that beginning from this point, and despite the renewal of
diplomatic tension such as during the spy crisis in September 2006,
Moscow's compliance and the abandonment of its military objectives via
its Georgian bases is irrevocable. From the summer of 2005 onwards,
the base at Batumi began to evacuate its material and personnel,
so that it will be ready to for the scheduled hand-over.
For the moment, there remain, all in all, two families and five
soldiers at the base.
A symbolic fact is that, several weeks after the intense crisis of
the spies between Moscow and Tbilisi, the Duma ratified October 13th,
2006, the law on the withdrawal of Russian bases from Georgia. It is
an incontestable sign that despite the apparent confrontation between
the two regimes, the evacuation of the Russian army is a fact confirmed
by the two parties. Moscow's decision was well taken.
Akhalkalaki
Despite the regular progression of things, the Georgian side has
expressed many doubts about the goodwill of the Russian army to
truly close up shop in Akhalkalaki. It was thought that Ajaria had
fallen completely under Tbilisi's control, and that Russia had been
forced to let the base go. But in Akhalkalaki, the political centre
of Javakhetia, the situation is very different.
A southern region of Georgia, on the Armenian border, and more than
90% ethnic Armenian, Javakhetia kindles a certain number of fears in
Tbilisi that raise the spectre of the sombre times of the 1990s.
Akhalkalaki is a town that enjoys a strong political identity, openly
opposed to the centralism of Tbilisi. Several Armenian organizations
with autonomist claims have been very active there since the beginning
of the 1990s, the population is armed, and it is clear that stability
is only hanging on by a thread. The acceptance by the Armenian
population of its belonging to Georgia is fragile.
In this context, Tbilisi will not stop denouncing Russia's influence
through its military base. Georgia accuses Russia of tinkering with
ethical questions including supporting local Armenian organizations
which derived from the paramilitary organization Javakhk that defended
the region against the Zviadist and Mkhedrioni Georgian militias,
in the early 1990s.
The Russian base and local activism
In the course of the last few years, a number of protests, some
violent, have taken place in Akhalkalaki. One of the demands of local
organizations, besides autonomous and the recognition of Armenian as
a second official language in the region, was the maintenance of the
Russian base.
In this demand, Tbilisi has always seen the hand of Moscow. But for
the inhabitants of Akhalkalaki, the question isn't any less vital.
The base was the economic heart of the town, assuring not only
numerous jobs, but also commerce in this particularly isolated
region. Constructed in the 19th century as a garrison town, Akhalkalaki
has never had any other function in recent history.
Another aspect of the question is the prime importance in the eyes
of the village population, which lives in intense preservation
of the memory of the Armenian genocide: the Russian presence is a
guarantee against the Turks, and if Moscow's troops leave, who can
assure this security? The most anxious discussions see the arrival of
Turkish troops under the umbrella of NATO after the departure of the
Russians. Kept isolated in a buffer zone near the border of Turkey, and
therefore, the border of NATO, Javakhetia's Armenian population grew
up during the Cold War under the idea of perpetual threat. Now that
the Russian departure is real, it up to Tbilisi to give guarantees.
It is certainly not by chance that on April 13th, the day of the bases
material evacuation, political organizations in the town held a rally
to demand that Georgia recognize Armenian as an official language in
the region. This confirms the direct link between the base and the
political activism in the town, and also shows that in front of the
irreversible withdrawal of the Russian army, Armenian organizations
feel the need to make their presence known more than ever. Although
the rumours that Moscow and local organizations will do everything
to impede the closure of the base have been denied, local activism
evidently does not stop here, all the more so as Akhalkalaki's
population is preoccupied with the still uncertain future.
What future for Akhalkalaki?
The Georgian government's declarations during these past two years
which aimed at forestalling protests by Akhalkalaki's political
society, have not been convincing. One such example is the "potato
affair". At the beginning of 2006, Mikheil Saakashvili promised that
the Georgian army would supply itself with potatoes only from the
inhabitants of Javakhetia. This crop is the region's only substantial
product and the only source of revenue besides the Russian base and
commerce (which has also depended largely on the base). The president
declared that the revenues from supplying the Georgian military would
equal those given by the Russian military base. Besides the enormity
of this promise, it soon turned out that the Georgian army continued
to supply itself only in a tiny part from Javakhetia, the vast majority
of its supply coming from Turkey or other Georgian regions.
Moreover, the production in Javakhetia is not sufficient to supply a
quarter of the needs of the army, and will never generate the expected
financial returns. This affair has provoked the population's anger.
Another promise was that the Georgian army would take over the base
and operate it fully and unaltered, as under the Russian army.
However, the majority of Russian soldiers were residents of
Akhalkalaki and supported more than half of the town's families. The
economic impact carried by the Georgian army, which probably would
not consist of as many natives, would not be comparable. Besides
these calculations, and given the limited size of the Georgian
army, the opening at the beginning of April of a new Georgian base
conforming to NATO's standards in Senaki, in Mingrelia, as well as
the construction of a similar base in Gori makes it doubtful that
the base at Akhalkalaki will see significant use in the near future.
Moreover, the base is far from the NATO standards that Tbilisi is
aiming for.
Despite all of this, Akhalkalaki does not seem lost. The construction
of the Baku-Akhalkalaki-Kars railroad, despite the reticence of the
Armenian population to see its region become a bridge between Eastern
and Western Turkish spaces, promises the creation of employment
opportunities and is a step towards opening the region. As much as
the conflicts between Armenia on one hand and Turkey and Azerbaijan
on the other have solidified, they represent an opportunity for the
development of Georgia's under-utilized transport routs.
For the time being, the evacuation of the base at Akhalkalaki, which
has aroused so many fears, will be carried out smoothly, completely
changing the dynamics of Russo-Georgian relations in Javakhetia
geostrategic, economic and political environment.
http://www.caucaz.com/home_eng/breve _contenu.php?id=314
By Nicolas Landru in Tbilissi
Translated by Kathryn Gaylord-Miles
Caucaz.com, Georgia
May 30 2007
The Russian military base at Akhalkalaki, in Javakheti, must close its
doors in the autumn of 2008. These are the terms of the Russo-Georgian
agreement of March 31, 2005, between Salome Zourabishvili, then the
Georgian Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Sergey Lavrov, her Russian
counterpart. However, the predictions of a turbulent closing have
not come true. According to the base commanders, on July 1st 2007,
it will be returned to Georgian authorities. The final phase of the
base closure has already started: On April 13th, 2007, the last of
the equipment left Akhalkalaki to be transferred to the base in Gyumri
in Armenia. On the 19th, the equipment left Georgian territory.
The days of the remaining 3000 servicemen, Russians and local Armenians
are numbered. They are waiting for the official closing; meanwhile,
the base remains half empty. The convoy of a dozen trucks containing
five high-tension generators, five tons of munitions and 1.5 tons of
various pieces of equipment, puts an end to the transfer of materials
from Akhalkalaki to Gyumri. Personnel will be redeployed to Armenia
and Russia after the base's closure.
Akhalkalaki is the penultimate of four Russian bases in Georgia to
officially close its doors. The beginning of its evacuation sounds
the death knell of the Russian military presence in the country. This
unravelling is not simple: the question of the retreat of Russian
troops from Georgia had been one of the major stumbling blocks in
Russo-Georgian relations for more than fifteen years. Successive
governments in Tbilisi have fiercely fought for the departure of the
Russian army. On Moscow's part, distortion and vagueness have given
the impression that no guarantee has been given, and that until
the last Russian soldier has left Georgian soil, nothing has been
finalized. This ambivalent attitude, in addition to the ambiguous
role Moscow has played in the separatist conflicts in Georgia, is in
contrast to Tbilisi's uncompromising position.
Tbilisi, Gudauta, Batumi
At the heart of the growing tensions between the two countries,
Tbilisi obtained the closing of the base at Vaziani, near Tbilisi, in
2001 after two years of diplomatic combat. OSCE threats made Moscow
bend. Moscow officially loosened its position and now accepts the
closing of the base at Gudauta, situated in the Abkhazian separatist
territory. But the role this base plays in the Abkhazia conflict-it
gave asylum to the first separatist president, Ardzinba, then gave
military support to Abkhazian forces-gives the impression that it
was closed only on paper. No inspection of the premises has been
authorized for international organizations, and Tbilisi suspects
illegal use of the base by joint Russian and Abkhazian forces.
That leaves the bases in Batumi and Akhalkalaki. The political quagmire
of the second presidential term of Shevardnadze has put the Georgian
successes on hold in the second half of the 1990s. After the Rose
Revolution, the confrontation with Moscow has been more direct and
Mikheil Saakashvili's government has made the departure of all Russian
forces one of its major goals.
The "coup of Ajaria" in the summer of 2004 restored the Ajarian
Autonomous Republic under Tbilisi's control. As a result, pressure
intensified on the base at Batumi and it became a more direct threat
to Tbilisi's authority. After heated negotiations, Georgia won, first
with an evacuation agreement in 2005, then with a final agreement
on March 31, 2006, fixing a hand-over for the end of 2008 for both
Batumi and Akhalkalaki.
It seems that beginning from this point, and despite the renewal of
diplomatic tension such as during the spy crisis in September 2006,
Moscow's compliance and the abandonment of its military objectives via
its Georgian bases is irrevocable. From the summer of 2005 onwards,
the base at Batumi began to evacuate its material and personnel,
so that it will be ready to for the scheduled hand-over.
For the moment, there remain, all in all, two families and five
soldiers at the base.
A symbolic fact is that, several weeks after the intense crisis of
the spies between Moscow and Tbilisi, the Duma ratified October 13th,
2006, the law on the withdrawal of Russian bases from Georgia. It is
an incontestable sign that despite the apparent confrontation between
the two regimes, the evacuation of the Russian army is a fact confirmed
by the two parties. Moscow's decision was well taken.
Akhalkalaki
Despite the regular progression of things, the Georgian side has
expressed many doubts about the goodwill of the Russian army to
truly close up shop in Akhalkalaki. It was thought that Ajaria had
fallen completely under Tbilisi's control, and that Russia had been
forced to let the base go. But in Akhalkalaki, the political centre
of Javakhetia, the situation is very different.
A southern region of Georgia, on the Armenian border, and more than
90% ethnic Armenian, Javakhetia kindles a certain number of fears in
Tbilisi that raise the spectre of the sombre times of the 1990s.
Akhalkalaki is a town that enjoys a strong political identity, openly
opposed to the centralism of Tbilisi. Several Armenian organizations
with autonomist claims have been very active there since the beginning
of the 1990s, the population is armed, and it is clear that stability
is only hanging on by a thread. The acceptance by the Armenian
population of its belonging to Georgia is fragile.
In this context, Tbilisi will not stop denouncing Russia's influence
through its military base. Georgia accuses Russia of tinkering with
ethical questions including supporting local Armenian organizations
which derived from the paramilitary organization Javakhk that defended
the region against the Zviadist and Mkhedrioni Georgian militias,
in the early 1990s.
The Russian base and local activism
In the course of the last few years, a number of protests, some
violent, have taken place in Akhalkalaki. One of the demands of local
organizations, besides autonomous and the recognition of Armenian as
a second official language in the region, was the maintenance of the
Russian base.
In this demand, Tbilisi has always seen the hand of Moscow. But for
the inhabitants of Akhalkalaki, the question isn't any less vital.
The base was the economic heart of the town, assuring not only
numerous jobs, but also commerce in this particularly isolated
region. Constructed in the 19th century as a garrison town, Akhalkalaki
has never had any other function in recent history.
Another aspect of the question is the prime importance in the eyes
of the village population, which lives in intense preservation
of the memory of the Armenian genocide: the Russian presence is a
guarantee against the Turks, and if Moscow's troops leave, who can
assure this security? The most anxious discussions see the arrival of
Turkish troops under the umbrella of NATO after the departure of the
Russians. Kept isolated in a buffer zone near the border of Turkey, and
therefore, the border of NATO, Javakhetia's Armenian population grew
up during the Cold War under the idea of perpetual threat. Now that
the Russian departure is real, it up to Tbilisi to give guarantees.
It is certainly not by chance that on April 13th, the day of the bases
material evacuation, political organizations in the town held a rally
to demand that Georgia recognize Armenian as an official language in
the region. This confirms the direct link between the base and the
political activism in the town, and also shows that in front of the
irreversible withdrawal of the Russian army, Armenian organizations
feel the need to make their presence known more than ever. Although
the rumours that Moscow and local organizations will do everything
to impede the closure of the base have been denied, local activism
evidently does not stop here, all the more so as Akhalkalaki's
population is preoccupied with the still uncertain future.
What future for Akhalkalaki?
The Georgian government's declarations during these past two years
which aimed at forestalling protests by Akhalkalaki's political
society, have not been convincing. One such example is the "potato
affair". At the beginning of 2006, Mikheil Saakashvili promised that
the Georgian army would supply itself with potatoes only from the
inhabitants of Javakhetia. This crop is the region's only substantial
product and the only source of revenue besides the Russian base and
commerce (which has also depended largely on the base). The president
declared that the revenues from supplying the Georgian military would
equal those given by the Russian military base. Besides the enormity
of this promise, it soon turned out that the Georgian army continued
to supply itself only in a tiny part from Javakhetia, the vast majority
of its supply coming from Turkey or other Georgian regions.
Moreover, the production in Javakhetia is not sufficient to supply a
quarter of the needs of the army, and will never generate the expected
financial returns. This affair has provoked the population's anger.
Another promise was that the Georgian army would take over the base
and operate it fully and unaltered, as under the Russian army.
However, the majority of Russian soldiers were residents of
Akhalkalaki and supported more than half of the town's families. The
economic impact carried by the Georgian army, which probably would
not consist of as many natives, would not be comparable. Besides
these calculations, and given the limited size of the Georgian
army, the opening at the beginning of April of a new Georgian base
conforming to NATO's standards in Senaki, in Mingrelia, as well as
the construction of a similar base in Gori makes it doubtful that
the base at Akhalkalaki will see significant use in the near future.
Moreover, the base is far from the NATO standards that Tbilisi is
aiming for.
Despite all of this, Akhalkalaki does not seem lost. The construction
of the Baku-Akhalkalaki-Kars railroad, despite the reticence of the
Armenian population to see its region become a bridge between Eastern
and Western Turkish spaces, promises the creation of employment
opportunities and is a step towards opening the region. As much as
the conflicts between Armenia on one hand and Turkey and Azerbaijan
on the other have solidified, they represent an opportunity for the
development of Georgia's under-utilized transport routs.
For the time being, the evacuation of the base at Akhalkalaki, which
has aroused so many fears, will be carried out smoothly, completely
changing the dynamics of Russo-Georgian relations in Javakhetia
geostrategic, economic and political environment.
http://www.caucaz.com/home_eng/breve _contenu.php?id=314