Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DISCUSSION: Insecurity De Jure In Return For Security De Facto

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DISCUSSION: Insecurity De Jure In Return For Security De Facto

    DISCUSSION: INSECURITY DE JURE IN RETURN FOR SECURITY DE FACTO
    Vahan Arzumanyan

    KarabakhOpen
    31-05-2007 13:37:55

    Immediately after the dissolution of the USSR the pan-Turkists stood
    a chance to start expansion towards the West via Armenia which had
    always been a hindrance to this policy. The result of the war in
    Karabakh had to be the emergence of a corridor in the region of
    Meghri of Armenia, which would connect Azerbaijan and Nakhidjevan,
    not necessarily under the control of the Azerbaijani force. As the
    best variant control over this corridor by the international force had
    been foreseen. The goal was to settle the corridor with Azerbaijanis,
    change the demographic pattern and actually sever this territory
    from Armenia. Unfortunately, it should be noted that this variant
    had supporters in the Armenian government.

    The military failed, and the apologists of pan-Turkism launched
    projects directed at isolation of Armenia, namely the Baku-Ceyhan
    pipeline, the Tbilisi-Akhalkalaki-Kars railroad. It is planned to
    station Turkish force along the pipeline under the aegis of NATO. It
    will allow Azerbaijanis to settle in these territories to create a
    Turkish corridor via Georgia and get control of the Armenian-Georgian
    border.

    Turkey refuses to set up diplomatic relations with Armenia, and the
    reason is not only the Genocide and the Karabakh conflict. Armenia
    with its present border does not favor Turkey. Therefore, all
    the controversies are used to kindle the confrontation, which may
    eventually lead to an armed conflict. And this is not raving. After
    the capture of Lachin the Turkish army did not attack Armenia thanks
    to the Russian force. What if Russia were not there?

    The second direction is to scare the international community. The
    international community (as well as part of the Armenians) is
    worried about the militaristic statements by Azerbaijani officials,
    who threaten to wage a new war.

    Hence, pressure is put on Armenia to accept the conditions of
    Azerbaijan. In additions, Karabakh is completely isolated (more exactly
    self-isolated) from deciding its fate, although the people of Karabakh
    had determined the outcome of the war. But is this the only reason
    why Karabakh is not participating in the talks? Instead of adequate
    actions in response to Azerbaijan's attacks most Armenian politicians
    call for peace and declare their readiness to make a compromise,
    thereby demoralizing their people.

    Meanwhile, Azerbaijan's stance is becoming harder and harder, and in
    every project of settlement the return of refugees is included with a
    possible referendum in 10 or 15 years. Independence is not mentioned
    at all. The purpose is the same - settlement of key border areas with
    Azerbaijanis to displace Armenians gradually.

    In this context, any compromise involving the return of territories
    brings us closer to another war. Therefore, the return of territories
    as well as the withdrawal of the Karabakh army should not be viewed
    theoretically, for the current location of the Karabakh army is
    the only factor which holds Azerbaijan back, and is the only real
    guarantee of security of Karabakh.

    As to international recognition, it is a mere declaration of
    independence but not a guarantee against a new war. Unrecognized
    but strong Karabakh has more chance to survive than recognized but
    weak Karabakh.
Working...
X