Tweet
HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST ASKED "INCONVENIENT" QUESTION, HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST IS TO BLAME
KarabakhOpen
05-06-2007 12:22:30
The response of the CEC to Albert Voskanyan's statement gives rise
to strange feelings. First, there is no answer to the question put by
the human rights defender. Second, the words describing the functions
of the human rights defender are taken in inverted commas. Besides,
the tone of the letter is not respectful, it is even ironical. It
seems to be written by an angry person. It is written in a way to
make any other human rights defender reluctant to apply to the CEC.
And the general impression of the response is: the human rights
activist asked "inconvenient" question, the human rights activist is
to blame.
No matter how good or bad the Constitution is, it must be honored. No
matter how good or bad the letter is, the answer must be full and
adequate.
Will the CEC register Bako Sahakyan? If yes, will the CEC explain to
the society adequately on what basis it did?
KarabakhOpen
05-06-2007 12:22:30
The response of the CEC to Albert Voskanyan's statement gives rise
to strange feelings. First, there is no answer to the question put by
the human rights defender. Second, the words describing the functions
of the human rights defender are taken in inverted commas. Besides,
the tone of the letter is not respectful, it is even ironical. It
seems to be written by an angry person. It is written in a way to
make any other human rights defender reluctant to apply to the CEC.
And the general impression of the response is: the human rights
activist asked "inconvenient" question, the human rights activist is
to blame.
No matter how good or bad the Constitution is, it must be honored. No
matter how good or bad the letter is, the answer must be full and
adequate.
Will the CEC register Bako Sahakyan? If yes, will the CEC explain to
the society adequately on what basis it did?