Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

YPC Report On Monitoring TV Channels Of Armenia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • YPC Report On Monitoring TV Channels Of Armenia

    YPC REPORT ON MONITORING TV CHANNELS OF ARMENIA

    A1+
    [05:43 pm] 07 March, 2007

    more images This monitoring report covers the period of February 1-28,
    2007. The monitoring object were 7 TV channels: the First Channel
    of the Public Television of Armenia, "ALM", "Armenia", "Kentron",
    Second Armenian TV Channel, "Shant" (Yerevan), "Yerkir-Media", namely,
    their daily air from 18.00 to 24.00. The programs that started, but
    did not end before 18.00 were not studied. The programs that started
    but did not end before 24.00 were studied completely.

    Monitors recorded the references to 34 political parties, most active
    in Armenia during the recent years, as well as the airtime allocated
    to them.

    The party "accounts" also received the portion of references and
    the airtime given to the representatives of these parties (their
    statements, speeches, quotations, as well as descriptions of their
    activities, opinion, and comment about them by other persons). In
    the cases when representatives of parties appeared as persons in
    their line of their non-partisan work, profession, etc., and their
    party affiliation was not stressed, the references and airtime were
    not recorded.

    The airtime, allocated to parties for promotional
    videos/announcements/materials about their activities, was recorded
    separately.

    The guests invited to interview, "guest in studio" programs throughout
    February were also listed separately.

    Along with the quantitative monitoring, the legislation, the overall
    media situation, statements of media representatives about their work
    during the pre-election period were analyzed.

    The purpose of the study is to define: 1) how comprehensive the
    information provided to the TV audience about the political spectrum
    and the activities of parties ahead of elections is; 2) whether equal
    opportunities are ensured for all parties to present their political
    views and platforms.

    "Kentron" TV channel was most active in covering the pre-election
    political situation: it allocated most airtime to different parties. It
    is followed by "Yerkir-Media", the Second Armenian TV Channel, the
    PTA First Channel and "Shant". "Kentron" and "Yerkir-Media" are also
    distinguished for their big number of current affairs programs and the
    diversity of the politicians and other public figures interviewed. The
    least interest to politics was demonstrated in February by "Armenia" TV
    channel: since early 2007 it gave up a whole number of current affairs
    programs, also of "guest in studio" type. Throughout the month the TV
    channel only made an exception for the RA Minister of Defense and the
    Chairman of the Council of Republican Party of Armenia Serge Sargsian.

    "ALM" TV channel holds a particular position here, because, on the
    one hand, it gave the most airtime to politics, but on the other,
    this was achieved by exceptional attention to the activities and the
    stance of the TV company owner Tigran Karapetian, also the head of the
    Popular Party. The Popular Party received 85.5% of "ALM" political air.

    Owing to the attention by this TV channel the Popular Party has a
    huge advantage over the remaining parties in terms of the airtime
    allocated to it and its leader on all 7 TV channels (78,263 sec.). At
    the same time 98% of the aggregate airtime given to the Popular Party
    is accounted for by "ALM". Besides, the Popular Party used the air
    of this channel for a number of announcements (3,924 sec.). "ALM" was
    the only TV channel in February, whose paid political air was used by
    a party - the United Labor Party, similarly to the previous months,
    placed its programs here.

    Among the leaders in terms of attention received from the TV channels
    are "Dashnaktsutiun" party (29,938 sec.), "Prosperous Armenia"
    (24,559 sec.), Republican Party of Armenia (22,630 sec.). These are
    the two parties, making up the basis of the ruling coalition as well
    as the party ("Prosperous Armenia") that started campaigning earlier
    than others and most actively, and, judging by the composition of its
    governing body, also quite close to the authorities. Rather distanced
    from them - for a party, represented by a parliament faction and
    membering in the ruling coalition - was the United Labor Party (3,929
    sec.). However, this party, to a significant extent, compensated
    these modest figures by the active use of paid air (being 3.5 times
    more than the editorial coverage of the party on 7 TV channels).

    Judging from what journalists themselves say, the disproportion in
    the attention of the TV channels to the parties in most cases is
    due to the following factors: the political weight of the party,
    the competence of its leaders and their readiness for contacts with
    media on a broad scope of issues, the influence of parties on certain
    TV channels and their owners, the availability of financial resources
    and activeness in conducting pre-election events.

    The First Channel of the Public TV of Armenia, having a particular
    mission in accordance with its status, distributed the attention to the
    parties mostly in close correspondence with their current position in
    the political arena (in particular, with their representation in the
    parliament): Republican Party of Armenia (6,038 sec.), "Orinats Yerkir"
    party (3,214 sec.), "Dashnaktsutiun" (3,127 sec.), People's Party of
    Armenia (1,810 sec.), "National Unity" (1,780 sec.). There is, however,
    one significant exception to this rule that will be discussed below.

    7 channels studied (this fully refers to the PTA First Channel, too)
    displayed either zero or little interest to these three parties. Their
    activities were either not covered at all, or were seldom and minimally
    referred to; their events, press conferences were little reported on,
    the representatives of these parties were never interviewed.
Working...
X