Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trafficking Victims Prefer not to Ask for Protection due to Fears

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trafficking Victims Prefer not to Ask for Protection due to Fears

    Trafficking Victims Prefer not to Ask for Protection for Fear to be
    Condemned by the Family and Neighbourhood

    Interview by Mariam Levina, ArmInfo, 25.04.07


    2007-05-21 10:37:00

    Interview of Head of the Department on Trafficking and Illegal
    Migration Control of Investigating Department of RA Prosecutor
    General's Office Marsel Matevosian to ArmInfo

    A Department for Trafficking and Illegal Migration Control was created
    on June 8, 2005, in the structure of the Investigating Department of
    RA Prosecutor General's Office, by the Prosecutor General's order. How
    do you assess the work done over the last period?


    I assess the work done by the Department satisfactory. The goal of
    this subdivision's setting up in the structure of the Prosecutor's
    Office was to organize a purposeful fight against this kind of crime
    of international character, assure thorough and complete investigation
    of criminal cases of this character, enhance efficiency of the
    prosecution defense and carry out the necessary analytical-information
    work in this sphere. The statistics indicates that creation of this
    Department served the goal set. For example, if 15 out of 35 criminal
    cases on trafficking were examined in 2004 by the Investigating
    Department, their number in 2005 made up 33 out of 40 and 36 out of 42
    in 2006, or 10 out of 27 cases were submitted in 2004, 23 out of 28 in
    2005 and 24 out of 29 in 2006. The Department investigated 34 criminal
    cases on trafficking out of the 35 registered in the republic till
    April 1, 2007 ( Articles 132 and 132 of RA CC). One criminal case was
    investigated by the National Security Service. A third of cases was
    instituted per the materials chosen, that is, new crimes of the same
    quantity have been revealed on the cases already instituted and under
    investigation. Moreover, the Department coordinated the work of the
    republic's Law machinery aimed at the trafficking-fight. The situation
    in this sphere was periodically studied and analyzed, relevant reports
    were presented and cooperation with mass media and the public
    organizations, dealing with this problem, was established.

    How many cases of trafficking have been registered by Armenia's
    law-enforcement agencies since the beginning, 2007, and how many
    criminal cases were instituted? How many people figured in them?

    Eight crimes on trafficking or trafficking-related crimes were
    registered in Armenia in the first quarter, 2007, 5 of which in the
    regions, 3 in Yerevan communities. Criminal cases have been instituted
    on all the revealed facts, including one criminal case per Article 132
    and 261, two ` per Article 132 and four cases per Article 262 of RA
    CC. Three of the earlier discontinued cases were resumed (2 per
    Article 132, 1 per Article 262, in view of detection of the
    wanted). Thus, fourteen cases were under investigation of the
    republic's investigation agencies in the first quarter, 2007,
    including 3 per Article 132, 4 per Article 132, 2 per Article 261, 5
    per Article 262. Half of them ` in the regions, another half ` in
    Yerevan communities. Seven of these criminal cases were taken to
    court, 1 case was suspended per i.2 p.1 31 of the Article of the Code
    of Criminal Procedure (examination evasion by the guilty. Two were
    combined with the other cases under investigation, four cases remained
    incomplete, the investigation continues.

    The statistics indicates the growth of the number of the
    trafficking-related crimes: 2 in 2004, 14 in 2005, 16 in 2006. Is it
    the result of activation of the law machinery or spread of this kind
    of crimes? Are there the data on a definite percent of recidivists in
    this kind of crimes?

    The reason of growth of the trafficking indicator level is both in
    spreading of this kind of crime and in efficient actions of the
    law-enforcement agencies. The second factor is of most importance.

    How many victims of trafficking are known at this moment? And were
    there non-adults among the victims?

    In the first quarter, 2007, on the criminal cases under execution, 75
    persons (all of them adult women) underwent exploitation, 73 of which
    underwent sexual exploitation, 2 ` labour exploitation (in
    Turkey). There are no under-age people, all of them are citizens of
    Armenia. Forty-three citizens underwent exploitation in RA, 32 ` in
    abroad, including 25 in UAE and 7 women in Turkey. The transit
    countries for transportation of women, subjected to sexual
    exploitation, were Russia (Moscow, 10 women were conveyed to UAE) and
    Georgia (in three cases, 7 women were conveyed to Turkey through
    Batumi). In the first quarter, 2007, 15 persons were called to
    administrative responsibility for prostitution. Fifty-nine prostitutes
    underwent medical examination, 7 women had venereal diseases,
    including 3 people with trichomonal and 4 with syphilis.

    It is well known that the main 'destination stations' of the
    trafficking victims are Turkey and UAE. It is also known that Armenia
    is a `supplier' or a transit state for trafficking. Nevertheless, are
    there data on the cases when trafficking victims are conveyed from
    other countries to Armenia for exploitation?

    There are only two cases registered when Armenia became the last
    station of trafficking. Several women were brought to the republic for
    exploitation from Uzbekistan in 2004 and several women-strippers -
    from Ukraine in 2005. Criminal proceedings were instituted on both
    cases, the guilty persons were convicted.

    The cooperation with UAE is regulated by agreements on mutual legal
    assistance on criminal cases and transfer of the wanted persons,
    signed in 2002. How many persons were transferred to Armenia by UAE
    within the frames of these agreements? How many wanted persons are
    there in the territory of UAE at present by the data of RA law
    machinery? Are there other directions of trafficking?

    Armenia has passed no wanted persons to UAE as yet. One woman was
    passed by UAE to the Armenian law-enforcement agencies. The criminal
    case as regards this lady has already been passed to the court. The
    wanted persons are transferred via Consulates. The victims, mainly
    from UAE, were deported from the country through RF as they had
    arrived in UAE via Moscow with false Russian passports. As of April
    1, 2007, several criminal cases of such character have been suspended:
    12 cases with respect to 13 persons, 11 cases have been suspended per
    i. 2, p. 1 of Article 31 of CPC (as a result of undetermined location
    of the guilty person), one case more ` per i.4, p. 1 of Article 31 of
    CPC (the guilty person is outside the country). Eighteen persons are
    under search on 14 criminal cases, 13 of them ` on 12 suspended cases,
    5 persons more - on two criminal cases under investigation. Eight
    persons are under international search. There are no specific data
    about the residence of the wanted persons in one or another
    country. There are also no official data today about the number of RA
    citizens in Turkey as the trafficking victims.

    Which of the Armenian regions is a `leader' by the number of
    trafficking` related crimes?

    The leaders by the level of trafficking are Lori and Shirak regions.
    According to the data of criminal cases, 23 out of 42 cases in 2006
    have been registered just there: 15 in Shirak and 8 in Lori.

    The trafficking victims usually explain what happened with them as
    deception. Did all the victims of the revealed cases of trafficking
    had any idea why they were carried to UAE or Turkey?

    All the victims of trafficking explained that they were promised a job
    in the area of service, afterwards, they were defrauded. However, the
    analysis of the criminal cases shows that the majority of them had
    experience in rendering sexual services. Though some of them expected
    they would have to deal with prostitution, nevertheless, they
    underwent exploitation. By the way, the considerable part of the
    procuress were prostitutes in the past. Mostly, they were living under
    severe social-economic conditions, they were the only bread-winners in
    the family, they were either divorced or widows, or their husbands had
    departed in search of a job and stopped helping their families.
    Having no other chance to earn money, these women became prostitutes,
    further, procuress or souteneurs. The girls from children's homes,
    boarding schools and the orphans are the most vulnerable groups.

    Earlier, there was the information about one case of the labour
    trafficking registered. Did this case remain unique or there are new
    ones?

    In fact, one case of labour trafficking more has been registered. This
    time, the case was connected with Turkey. It has become clear, over
    the investigation, that Gayane Poghosyan and Silvard Ghazaryan, having
    taken advantage of a difficult financial state of the two residents of
    Gyumri, Zoya M. and Gayane A. and having promised them a high-paid
    job, conveyed them to Turkey and passed to some Ahmad Kayay, a Turk by
    nationality, having got $500 for each of them. The `client' forced the
    women to do a hard work for 18-20 hours per day within 2
    months. Criminal proceedings have been instituted on this fact per
    pp.1 and 2 of Article 132 of CC on March 23, 2007. The majority of the
    labour trafficking victims are men, emigrants who seek a job abroad,
    mainly in RF. Very often, these people are exploited on building
    works, in small and private enterprises. However, bad, severe,
    insanitary working conditions, low salary, non-payment or partial
    payment of salary contain no components of trafficking-crime.

    Earlier, the Prosecutor General of Armenia Aghvan Hovsepyan expressed
    discontent with the level of revelation and prevention of such kind of
    crimes. Moreover, he expressed discontent with the level of
    operative-search measures control by Police for revelation of the
    wanted persons and control of the condemned ones. What steps are taken
    to correct the situation?

    The regional prosecutors and Heads of Police departments were ordered
    to take additional measures to activate the trafficking `fight and
    illegal transportation of people for further sexual exploitation or
    prostitution. In particular, by the Prosecutor General's order, a
    special working group was created in November, 2006, within the frames
    of the UNDP Memorandum of Understanding, for efficient organization of
    works aimed at implementation of information technologies in the
    structure of the Prosecutor General's Office. Personnel changes have
    also been made in the structure of the Department on trafficking and
    illegal migration fight. The Heads of structural subdivisions of the
    Prosecutor's Office have been ordered to assure the rights and
    interests of the trafficking victims to the maximum during examination
    and trial, to invite a psychologist, to make cooperation with the
    relevant subdivisions of other law enforcement agencies, international
    and public organizations, involved in the trafficking-fight, more
    efficient, as well as to organize the extension courses. Four persons
    have been revealed and convicted as a result of the measures taken.
    The works are continued.

    How many facts of illegal transit of potential victims of trafficking
    through the territory of Armenia were fixed?

    Armenia has appeared as a transit-country only once. The case was
    connected with an attempt of transit of 3 citizens of Uzbekistan to
    UAE via `Zvartnots' airport. The attempt was suppressed by RA Law
    Machinery. The guilty persons have been convicted.

    How often the trafficking victims apply to the law machinery by
    themselves?

    In general, the trafficking victims prefer to return home incognito
    and not address the court or a public organization for
    protection. They do that not because of absence of the protection
    means but for fear of being condemned by the family and
    neighbourhood. They fear for undesirable details to be disclosed.
    There are no such problems as regards the labour trafficking. To note,
    the trafficking victims are not obliged to testify or cooperate with
    the law machinery. Having received the operative data on the examined
    case, the relevant agencies (Police, NSS) invite the supposed victim
    to talk. In case of agreement, they fix the fact of crime, followed by
    the preparation of materials, institution of criminal proceedings and
    investigation, or, by approbation of the victim, they receive the data
    from the relevant public organization, to which the victim addressed.

    If it is possible to create the trafficking victims rehabilitation
    center?

    It is possible and necessary. In fact, several public organizations,
    the AMCOR, `Hope and Assistance', `Democracy today', that work by
    international grants, carry out this work. The victims apply to them
    or the latter direct the victims to the law-enforcement agencies if
    they agree. However, the resources of these organizations are limited
    in view of the lack of financial means. After leaving the refuge and
    having no place to go, these people face numerous problems such as
    lack of job and shelter. I think, it would be right to create the
    budget-financed state refuge.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X