Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CNN: White House: Genocide Resolution Would Hurt Relations With Key

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CNN: White House: Genocide Resolution Would Hurt Relations With Key

    WHITE HOUSE: GENOCIDE RESOLUTION WOULD HURT RELATIONS WITH KEY ALLY

    CNN News
    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/10/us.tur key.armenians/
    Oct 10 2007

    WASHINGTON (CNN) President Bush and key figures in his administration
    lobbied hard Wednesday against a House resolution that labels the
    killings of Armenians in Turkey during World War I as "genocide."

    President Bush urges the House not to pass a resolution he says would
    harm U.S. relations with Turkey.

    1 of 2 The president, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense
    Secretary Robert Gates said passage of the resolution would hurt
    relations with an important U.S. ally.

    Bush urged lawmakers to oppose the resolution, which he said would
    cause "great harm" to U.S. relations with Turkey, which he called a
    key ally in NATO and the "global war on terror."

    "We all deeply regret the tragic suffering of the Armenian people
    that began in 1915. This resolution is not the right response to
    those historic mass killings," Bush said at the White House.

    Earlier, Rice and Gates made their comments jointly before reporters
    at the White House. They said Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S.

    military officer in Iraq, and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker,
    and head of U.S. Central Command Adm. William Fallon raised concerns
    about the resolution.

    "We recognize the feelings of those who want to express their concern
    and their disdain for what happened many years ago," Rice said. "But
    the passage of this resolution at this time would, indeed, be very
    problematic for everything that we're trying to do in the Middle East
    because we are very dependent on a good Turkish strategic ally to help
    with our efforts." Watch why Rice and Gates oppose the resolution "

    The nonbinding proposal, which is to be considered by the House
    Foreign Affairs Committee, refers to the "genocide" of Armenians in
    the early 20th century during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire,
    which preceded the creation of modern Turkey in 1923.

    Don't Miss Kurdish group's decades of violent struggle Report:
    Turkey hits rebels in Iraq "In the case that Armenian allegations are
    accepted, there will be serious problems in the relations between
    the two countries," said President Abdullah Gul in a letter to
    President Bush.

    Nabi Sensoy, Turkey's ambassador to the United States, told CNN the
    resolution's passage would be a "very injurious move to the psyche
    of the Turkish people."

    He predicted a "backlash" in the country, saying there would
    be setbacks on several fronts: Turkish-American relations,
    Turkish-Armenian relations and the normalization of relations between
    the nations of Turkey and Armenia.

    Gates said good relations with Turkey are vital because 70 percent
    of the air cargo intended for and 30 percent of the fuel consumed by
    the U.S. forces in Iraq flies through Turkey.

    U.S. commanders, Gates said, "believe clearly that access to airfields
    and roads and so on in Turkey would very much be put at risk if
    this resolution passes and the Turks react as strongly as we believe
    they will."

    "Our heavy dependence on the Turks for access is really the reason
    the commanders raised this and why we're so concerned about the
    resolution," Gates said.

    The resolution, which has much support in the full House, calls on
    the president "to ensure that the foreign policy of the United States
    reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues
    related to human rights, ethnic cleansing and genocide documented in
    the United States record relating to the Armenian genocide, and for
    other purposes."

    A similar resolution passed the committee by a 40-7 vote two years ago,
    but it never reached the full House floor. House Republican leader
    John Boehner, noting the critical military and strategic alliance
    with Turkey, said bringing the resolution to the floor would be
    "totally irresponsible."

    "Let the historians decide what happened 90 years ago," Boehner said
    in a written statement.

    Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, the resolution's author and sponsor,
    refers to "the systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000
    Armenians as genocide."

    The term genocide is defined in dictionary.com as "the deliberate
    and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or
    cultural group."

    But the description is hotly disputed in Turkey, the predominantly
    Muslim, but modern and secular, pro-Western ally of the United States.

    Turks argue that all peoples -- Armenians and Turks -- suffered during
    the warfare. But Armenians maintain there was an organized genocide
    by the Ottoman Turkish authorities, and have been campaigning across
    the world for official recognition of the genocide.

    The resolution arrives at a particularly sensitive juncture in
    U.S.-Turkish relations. The United States has urged Turkey not to
    send its troops over the border into northern Iraq to fight Kurdish
    separatist rebels, who have launched some cross-border attacks against
    Turkish targets.

    Observers of U.S.-Turkish relations have argued that the House
    resolution could make Turkey less inclined to use restraint in dealing
    with its longstanding problems with the Kurdistan Workers Party.

    Schiff, who represents a southern California district with many
    Armenian-Americans, said the "bipartisan measure currently has 226
    cosponsors, more than a majority in the House and the most support
    an Armenian genocide resolution has ever received."

    "The United States has a compelling historical and moral reason to
    recognize the Armenian genocide, which cost a million and a half people
    their lives," said Schiff. "But we also have a powerful contemporary
    reason as well. How can we take effective action against the genocide
    in Darfur if we lack the will to condemn genocide whenever and wherever
    it occurs?"

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X