Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genocide resolution's support is fading

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Genocide resolution's support is fading

    Genocide resolution's support is fading

    Some House sponsors, while agreeing with Armenians on history, think
    the international implications are risky.

    By Richard Simon
    Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

    October 17, 2007

    WASHINGTON - A controversial measure to officially recognize the
    Armenian genocide, which only days ago appeared headed for approval in
    the House, has begun to lose support. The change comes in the face of
    furious protests by the Turkish government and warnings of possible
    repercussions for U.S. military operations in Iraq.

    Seven representatives withdrew as cosponsors on Monday, followed by at
    least four more Tuesday. Since Jan. 30, when the resolution was
    introduced, at least 21 representatives have pulled their names,
    leaving 215 cosponsors -- short of a majority of the House.

    "Now is not the appropriate time for us to stick our finger in the eye
    of an important ally," said Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), who removed
    himself as a cosponsor on Monday.

    The House resolution poses a quandary for Democratic supporters,
    particularly Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco), who has promised
    to bring it to the floor

    Armenian Americans, an important constituency in California, have
    pushed for years to get Congress to declare the early 20th century
    killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks a genocide. But some Democrats
    have grown increasingly uneasy about voting for a resolution that
    could be seen as harming national security or jeopardizing U.S. troops
    in Iraq.

    President Bush telephoned Pelosi on Tuesday to urge her not to bring
    up the resolution, which calls on the president to "accurately
    characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000
    Armenians as genocide." Pelosi said on national television Sunday that
    she had never heard from the president on the issue. Nine of the 11
    lawmakers who withdrew their support this week are Democrats, and one
    of Pelosi's closest allies -- Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), chairman of
    the House Defense Appropriations Committee -- is working to defeat the
    measure. The House leadership has yet to set a date for a vote but has
    been aiming to hold it before Thanksgiving.

    Although the number of cosponsors is not necessarily an indication of
    a measure's fate -- some lawmakers have signaled their support for the
    resolution even though they are not cosponsors -- supporters believed
    the measure had its best chance in years to pass after more than half
    of the House members signed on.

    The sudden drop in support comes less than week after the resolution
    cleared the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

    That vote angered Turkey, which could disrupt military operations in
    Iraq by denying the U.S. access to Incirlik -- a crucial air base used
    to supply troops. At the same time, the Turkish prime minister is
    weighing a raid into northern Iraq to hit Kurdish rebels. That could
    destabilize the safest region in Iraq.

    Supporters and opponents of the genocide resolution now believe that
    the vote could be tight, and both sides have stepped up their
    lobbying.

    Gordon Johndroe, the National Security Council spokesman, said that
    top administration officials have been on the phone to House members.
    "We continue to urge the House not to take up the measure," Johndroe
    said. "Calls have been made at all levels, up to the president."

    Supporters noted that several members of the House Foreign Affairs
    Committee back the resolution, even though they were not cosponsors.
    "We have got to go on the counterattack," said Rep. Brad Sherman
    (D-Sherman Oaks). "If we had the vote today, it would be close."

    Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), the bill's chief sponsor,
    acknowledged that it would not be an easy fight. "When you think about
    what we have against us -- the president, a foreign policy
    establishment that has condoned this campaign of denial, the Turkish
    lobby," he said, "against that you have the truth, which is a powerful
    thing but doesn't always win out."

    Trent Wisecup, an aide to Rep. Joe Knollenberg (R-Mich.), co-chairman
    of the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, called on Pelosi to
    throw around her political weight. "Time to step up, Madame Speaker,"
    he said. Pelosi has said that she will not seek to pressure
    colleagues, calling it a vote of conscience.

    A number of the resolution's supporters said they were still hopeful
    it would pass. "The support continues to be strong, and it continues
    to be bipartisan," said Elizabeth S. Chouldjian of the Armenian
    National Committee of America.

    "Some congressional offices have told us, 'I'm with you but I'm not
    going to put my name on a piece of paper so that I become a target of
    the Gephardts and Livingstons of the world,' " she added. She was
    referring to the Turkish government's heavyweight lobbyists: Richard
    Gephardt, a former House Democratic leader, and Robert Livingston, a
    Republican who was chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

    Several lawmakers who have backed away from the resolution said that
    they had become convinced that the situation in the Middle East was
    too volatile to support a symbolic resolution that jeopardized the
    relationship the U.S. has with a critical Muslim ally.

    Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-Mich.), one of those who pulled her
    name as a cosponsor, said: "I do not condone the genocide. I just
    think the timing is bad."

    Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said he withdrew as a cosponsor after Army
    Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, warned him
    during a recent trip to Baghdad that the resolution could harm U.S.
    security interests.

    Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), who also withdrew as a cosponsor, said
    that he had "no doubt that the Armenian people endured unspeakable
    suffering and loss at the hand of the Ottoman Empire." But he said, "I
    am not willing to place our military forces at risk or upset a
    delicate diplomatic situation on the northern border of Iraq."

    The Bush administration has warned that House passage of the
    resolution could lead Turkey to restrict U.S. use of its land, ports
    and airspace to supply troops in Iraq.

    Lt. Gen. Carter F. Ham, director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of
    Staff, said the United States was pressing Turkey to continue to allow
    supplies to go through its territory, but could find other access
    routes.

    "We're confident that we'll find ways to be able to do that," he said.

    Some of the House members who withdrew their support for the
    resolution acknowledged that they had been unaware of the
    ramifications it could have. "Had I known when I signed the resolution
    that it would develop into this huge of an issue, I would have
    refrained from signing," said Rep. Lincoln Davis (D-Tenn.).

    Rep. Wally Herger (R-Chico), who also pulled his name as a cosponsor,
    said, "Currently, the United States is dealing with the grave and
    ongoing threat posed by worldwide radical jihadists and we simply
    cannot allow the grievances of the past -- as real as they may be --
    to in any way derail our efforts to prevent further atrocities for
    future history books."

    [email protected]

    Times staff writers Julian E. Barnes and Paul Richter contributed to
    this report.

    Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/ la-na-genocide17oct17,1,6732163.story?ctrack=6&amp ;cset=true
Working...
X