Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia Vote a Test for Pelosi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia Vote a Test for Pelosi

    Roll Call
    October 18, 2007 Thursday


    Armenia Vote a Test for Pelosi

    by Jennifer Yachnin, ROLL CALL STAFF



    Dimming prospects that the House will take up a resolution to
    redefine a 1915 massacre of Armenians as genocide have threatened to
    cast a shadow over Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) first foray into
    foreign policy not directly tied to the Iraq War.

    Facing opposition from within her own party, including one of her
    closest advisers, Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense Chairman
    John Murtha (D-Pa.), Pelosi remained vague Wednesday on when or
    whether the measure would be scheduled on the House floor.

    "Whether it will come up or not ... remains to be seen," Pelosi said,
    stating that she is working with the measure's sponsors to determine
    how to proceed.

    Although the Californian told a Sunday news program that the House
    would vote on the measure, which she has backed, support for the
    resolution among both Democrats and Republicans has ebbed in the days
    since the Foreign Affairs Committee voted on the bill last week.

    In addition, both President Bush and House Republicans have
    denigrated the proposal, questioning its timing and accusing
    Democrats of attempting to alienate an ally in the Iraq War.

    "With all these pressing responsibilities, one thing Congress should
    not be doing is sorting out the historical record of the Ottoman
    Empire," Bush said on Wednesday. "Congress has more important work to
    do than antagonizing a democratic ally in the Muslim world,
    especially one that is providing vital support for our military every
    day."

    Democratic leaders have denied those allegations - noting the
    resolution does not target the current Turkish government - but even
    so, rank-and-file Members in the majority echoed those concerns this
    week.

    Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), chairman of the Helsinki Commission,
    and Rep. John Tanner (D-Tenn.), chairman of the House delegation to
    the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, issued a letter to Pelosi and
    Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) Tuesday to assert that the
    measure would damage diplomatic relations with Turkey and potentially
    further destabilize Iraq.

    "Diplomatic relations between our two nations are clearly strained,"
    Hastings said at a press conference Wednesday, along with Tanner,
    Murtha and Reps. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) and Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.).

    Nonetheless, even as those Democratic opponents lobbied against
    moving the bill to the House floor Wednesday, several said the
    measure should be viewed as a success for Pelosi.

    "It's two very different issues," said Wexler, who chairs the Foreign
    Affairs Subcommittee on Europe. "I do believe the Speaker has
    accomplished a very significant accomplishment in raising the
    consciousness of the issue."

    Murtha, a longtime opponent of the measure, similarly defended
    Pelosi, stating: "She feels morally committed to this issue. It's
    just, is it practical at this point to go forward with it?"

    According to online legislative records maintained by the Library of
    Congress, the Armenian resolution currently has 214 co-sponsors but
    has lost the endorsement of 21 lawmakers, including 14 who formally
    abandoned the bill in October.

    One Democratic lawmaker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity,
    remains listed as a co-sponsor of the measure, but said he remains
    uncertain whether he will vote for its passage.

    "I don't think this issue is meant to be a foreign policy thrust on
    the part of the Democrats," the lawmaker said, and added: "I don't
    view this as a setback for the Speaker."

    Murtha said Wednesday, however, that he estimates between 55 and 60
    Democrats likely would oppose the bill if a vote were taken
    immediately.

    "If it were to run today, it would not pass," he added. After leaving
    the press conference, Murtha said of Democratic leaders: "I think
    they did miscalculate" support for the measure.

    Republican Rep. Ray LaHood (Ill.), who also is listed as co-sponsor
    of the measure, echoed Murtha's sentiment and suggested that
    Democrats may have not given the issue enough attention.

    Pelosi "got ahead of her troops. This is the first time it's
    happened. She and her staff have learned a very hard lesson," he
    said. "These leadership jobs are not easy, particularly when they
    have a fractured Caucus like they do."

    Should Democrats shelve the measure, it would mirror a decision made
    in 2000 by then-Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), who canceled a vote
    on the same resolution at the request of then-President Clinton.

    Earlier this year, Republicans targeted Pelosi after she met with
    Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during a Middle East trip to Israel,
    the Palestinian territories, Syria and Saudi Arabia with a contingent
    of Democratic House Members and one Republican lawmaker.

    The trip was criticized by the White House and drew the ire of most
    Republican Members back home, particularly after the Israeli
    government refuted remarks Pelosi made in Syria that Israel was ready
    to engage in peace negotiations with the al-Assad regime.

    In the meantime, Democrats faced other headaches Wednesday in the
    House, prompting leadership to scrub an expected vote on revised
    rules targeting the government's wiretapping and surveillance
    programs.

    Republicans claimed credit for the delay on reauthorizing the Foreign
    Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was prompted by a GOP-authored
    amendment that was to be offered under a parliamentary procedure
    known as a motion to recommit.

    "Our proposal gives Democrats a very simple choice: They can allow
    our intelligence officials to conduct surveillance on likes of Osama
    bin Laden and al-Qaida or prohibit them from doing so and jeopardize
    our national security," House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio)
    said in a statement. "Every member of the Majority will now have the
    opportunity to go on record and take a firm position for or against
    giving our intelligence community all the tools they need to keep
    America safe."

    But Democrats criticized the expected amendment.

    "Their motion to recommit is an attempt to take a political shot on a
    critical national security bill, and we're not going to let them play
    politics with our nation's security," said Kristie Greco, spokeswoman
    for House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).
Working...
X