Tweet
PARTISAN POLITICS AND DEMOCRATS' TURKEY PROBLEM
By Stuart Rothenberg
RealClearPolitics, IL
Oct 22 2007
If there is anything that points out the difference between most
Republicans and most Democrats, it is Congress' effort to pass a
resolution that labels Turkey's slaughter of Armenians almost a
century ago as "genocide."
The White House has opposed the action, which has been pushed by House
Democrats. While some Republicans have been supporting the measure
(and supported previous attempts to please Armenian-Americans by
embarrassing Turkey), the current resolution is primarily a Democratic
initiative on Capitol Hill.
But if you cut through all of the politicking and even put aside the
specifics of the current controversy, you see that fundamentally,
the issue is this: For Republicans, politics is never having to say
you're sorry. For Democrats, politics primarily is about an endless
number of apologies and condolences, and a feeling of unquenchable
guilt, though it tends to be institutional, not personal.
Republicans apparently figure that what's past is past, so you might
as well forget about it. You got a problem? Deal with it. As a party,
the GOP isn't big on apologies, reparations or public assertions
of sympathy.
It's not that Republicans never experience guilt. Actually, they are
drowning in it. But it's personal guilt, some of it apparently coming
from original sin (except for Rep. Eric Cantor [Va.] and Sens. Arlen
Specter [Pa.] and Norm Coleman [Minn.], no doubt).
As former President Bill Clinton proved, Democrats are much better
at publicly feeling people's pain, even if it occurred more than 100
years ago and all of the people actually involved in the incident
are long gone. It doesn't even matter whether the United States was
involved. Democrats pretty much are ready to apologize or commiserate
for anything, anyplace and anytime.
Luckily for Democrats, we've had centuries of people oppressing
people around the world, so there is almost an endless supply of
brutalities and injustices deserving of attention, classification,
condemnation and apology.
In fact, so many unfortunate things have happened over the past few
centuries that the next Democratic Congress can spend pretty much all
of its time, if it wants to, apologizing to groups and demanding that
other people apologize, too. Democrats have only begun to scratch
the surface on groups they want to apologize to.
The problem for the Democrats is that the controversy over Congress'
steps to assert that Turkey was guilty of a policy of genocide isn't
a laughing matter -- at least it isn't to the Turks. Instead, it is
the first truly dumb thing that Democrats may have done since the
party won both chambers of Congress last year.
It now looks as if House Democrats may put the Armenian genocide
measure in the deep freeze, hoping that everyone forgets about it.
But while that may limit the damage that the party could cause itself,
burying the measure wouldn't inoculate Democrats completely from the
fallout caused by their initial efforts to pass the resolution.
I recently asked a couple of Democrats -- an incumbent Member of
Congress from a Democratic-leaning district who is on record supporting
the measure and a long-shot Congressional challenger in a Republican
district -- whether they now favored the genocide resolution, and
both acted as if the measure were infected with botulism.
The resolution has strained U.S.-Turkish relations at exactly the
worst time, when a Turkish incursion into Iraq could complicate the
already complicated American military and political mission in Iraq.
"Democrats are harming the future of the United States and are
encouraging anti-American sentiments," Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip
Erdogan asserted about 10 days ago.
Democrats, of course, have been criticizing President Bush for years
for allegedly contributing to an increase in anti-Americanism around
the world, so Erdogan's comment gives Republicans ammunition to use
against Democrats.
If Turkey's military forces cross into Iraq to attack Kurdish
guerillas, Republicans could well try to change the subject of Iraq
by blaming Democrats for antagonizing the government of Turkey and
undermining the U.S. effort in Iraq.
Democrats have been successful for the past few years by keeping
the focus on GOP failures and by criticizing Bush administration
policies. But the House leadership's miscalculations on the "genocide"
resolution points out both that making policy is more difficult than
criticizing and that House Democrats are likely to make their share
of problems when they become more ambitious.
Stuart Rothenberg is the editor of the The Rothenberg Political Report,
and a regular columnist for Roll Call Newspaper.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
By Stuart Rothenberg
RealClearPolitics, IL
Oct 22 2007
If there is anything that points out the difference between most
Republicans and most Democrats, it is Congress' effort to pass a
resolution that labels Turkey's slaughter of Armenians almost a
century ago as "genocide."
The White House has opposed the action, which has been pushed by House
Democrats. While some Republicans have been supporting the measure
(and supported previous attempts to please Armenian-Americans by
embarrassing Turkey), the current resolution is primarily a Democratic
initiative on Capitol Hill.
But if you cut through all of the politicking and even put aside the
specifics of the current controversy, you see that fundamentally,
the issue is this: For Republicans, politics is never having to say
you're sorry. For Democrats, politics primarily is about an endless
number of apologies and condolences, and a feeling of unquenchable
guilt, though it tends to be institutional, not personal.
Republicans apparently figure that what's past is past, so you might
as well forget about it. You got a problem? Deal with it. As a party,
the GOP isn't big on apologies, reparations or public assertions
of sympathy.
It's not that Republicans never experience guilt. Actually, they are
drowning in it. But it's personal guilt, some of it apparently coming
from original sin (except for Rep. Eric Cantor [Va.] and Sens. Arlen
Specter [Pa.] and Norm Coleman [Minn.], no doubt).
As former President Bill Clinton proved, Democrats are much better
at publicly feeling people's pain, even if it occurred more than 100
years ago and all of the people actually involved in the incident
are long gone. It doesn't even matter whether the United States was
involved. Democrats pretty much are ready to apologize or commiserate
for anything, anyplace and anytime.
Luckily for Democrats, we've had centuries of people oppressing
people around the world, so there is almost an endless supply of
brutalities and injustices deserving of attention, classification,
condemnation and apology.
In fact, so many unfortunate things have happened over the past few
centuries that the next Democratic Congress can spend pretty much all
of its time, if it wants to, apologizing to groups and demanding that
other people apologize, too. Democrats have only begun to scratch
the surface on groups they want to apologize to.
The problem for the Democrats is that the controversy over Congress'
steps to assert that Turkey was guilty of a policy of genocide isn't
a laughing matter -- at least it isn't to the Turks. Instead, it is
the first truly dumb thing that Democrats may have done since the
party won both chambers of Congress last year.
It now looks as if House Democrats may put the Armenian genocide
measure in the deep freeze, hoping that everyone forgets about it.
But while that may limit the damage that the party could cause itself,
burying the measure wouldn't inoculate Democrats completely from the
fallout caused by their initial efforts to pass the resolution.
I recently asked a couple of Democrats -- an incumbent Member of
Congress from a Democratic-leaning district who is on record supporting
the measure and a long-shot Congressional challenger in a Republican
district -- whether they now favored the genocide resolution, and
both acted as if the measure were infected with botulism.
The resolution has strained U.S.-Turkish relations at exactly the
worst time, when a Turkish incursion into Iraq could complicate the
already complicated American military and political mission in Iraq.
"Democrats are harming the future of the United States and are
encouraging anti-American sentiments," Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip
Erdogan asserted about 10 days ago.
Democrats, of course, have been criticizing President Bush for years
for allegedly contributing to an increase in anti-Americanism around
the world, so Erdogan's comment gives Republicans ammunition to use
against Democrats.
If Turkey's military forces cross into Iraq to attack Kurdish
guerillas, Republicans could well try to change the subject of Iraq
by blaming Democrats for antagonizing the government of Turkey and
undermining the U.S. effort in Iraq.
Democrats have been successful for the past few years by keeping
the focus on GOP failures and by criticizing Bush administration
policies. But the House leadership's miscalculations on the "genocide"
resolution points out both that making policy is more difficult than
criticizing and that House Democrats are likely to make their share
of problems when they become more ambitious.
Stuart Rothenberg is the editor of the The Rothenberg Political Report,
and a regular columnist for Roll Call Newspaper.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress