Tweet
Times Daily, Alabama
Oct 28 2007
Pelosi gets yet another lesson in diplomacy
By Jonathan Gurwitz
Last Updated:October 27. 2007 11:00PM
Published: October 28. 2007 3:30AM
Commentary: Now that the United States has 168,000 military personnel
in Iraq, it's a different story on Capitol Hill.
The last time House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did her best impersonation
of a secretary of state, her amateur performance was merely reckless.
This time it is dangerous.
Pelosi's April visit to Syria should have demonstrated a fundamental
about diplomacy - words matter.
Pelosi created an international tempest by claiming to bear a message
for Syrian dictator Bashar Assad from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert, one stating that his country was prepared to engage in peace
talks with its longtime enemy without preconditions. That would have
marked a significant departure from six decades of Israeli practice.
Olmert did not make such a departure, which forced the Israeli
Foreign Ministry to issue a clarification that contradicted Pelosi's
supposed communique.
Pelosi also declared that the road to peace in Lebanon, which Syrian
Baathists regard as a vassal state, runs through Damascus. Farid
Ghadry, president of the Reform Party of Syria, blasted Pelosi's
carelessness, writing, "Assad is viewing her trip as a green light to
take over Lebanon the same way Saddam viewed (U.S. Ambassador to Iraq
April) Glaspie's lack of interference as a green light to invade
Kuwait."
Unlike Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, who prefaced the
dialogue with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with a harsh
rebuke of his government's repressive policies, Pelosi's photo-op
notably glossed over Assad's totalitarian tendencies and his regime's
routine violation of human rights.
This month, 92 years after the fact, Pelosi felt the time had come
for American lawmakers to finally issue a definitive statement about
the first state-sponsored mass murder of the 20th century. When the
Armenian genocide issue came up in 2000, one of its most forceful
opponents was Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif. The Fresno Bee reports that
Lantos warned against offending Turkey, telling colleagues that
"there is a long list of reasons why our NATO ally at this point
should not be humiliated."
Some of those reasons were related to U.S. enforcement of a U.N.
no-fly zone in northern Iraq: No access to U.S. bases in Turkey, no
no-fly zone.
President Bill Clinton felt that the security imperatives in Iraq
outweighed the political significance of a congressional declaration
in Washington. So he appealed to members of his own party, including
Lantos, to delay the genocide resolution and, ultimately, to
Republican House Speaker Denny Hastert to kill it.
Now that the United States has 168,000 military personnel in Iraq,
it's a different story on Capitol Hill. Lantos, as chairman of the
House Foreign Affairs Committee, dismisses Turkish sensitivity.
"The Turkish-American relationship is infinitely more valuable to
Turkey than it is to the United States," he said recently on CNN.
President Bush appealed to Congress to put the welfare of American
military personnel first. Most military air cargo headed for Iraq
passes through Turkey's Incirlik air base, including new MRAP -
mine-resistant, ambush-protected - vehicles that are finally
providing a measure of protection against deadly IED attacks. No
Incirlik, no MRAPs, or at least their delivery to the war zone will
be delayed. Contrary to Lantos' assertion, more Americans will die if
the United States loses access to bases in Turkey.
Yet, unlike her predecessor as speaker, Pelosi pushed forward with
the genocide resolution, in spite of the known consequences. Assuming
the guise of secretary of state again, she said it was part of her
mandate to reassert America's moral authority. By end of week, cooler
heads appeared to be prevailing.
Congress should go on record about the atrocities that claimed 1.5
million Armenian lives. Historical amnesia about the systematic
slaughter of Armenians has encouraged many of the genocidal movements
that followed.
But after nine decades and with a war in Iraq, now is not the time to
put U.S.-Turkish relations to a test.
Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, George Shultz, James Baker,
Lawrence Eagleburger, Warren Christopher, Madeleine Albright and
Colin Powell sent Pelosi a letter in September warning her that the
resolution would endanger U.S. national security interests. A real
secretary of state would already know that.
Jonathan Gurwitz writes for the San Antonio Express-News. His
http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20071028/N EWS/710280326/-1/COMMUNITIES
Oct 28 2007
Pelosi gets yet another lesson in diplomacy
By Jonathan Gurwitz
Last Updated:October 27. 2007 11:00PM
Published: October 28. 2007 3:30AM
Commentary: Now that the United States has 168,000 military personnel
in Iraq, it's a different story on Capitol Hill.
The last time House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did her best impersonation
of a secretary of state, her amateur performance was merely reckless.
This time it is dangerous.
Pelosi's April visit to Syria should have demonstrated a fundamental
about diplomacy - words matter.
Pelosi created an international tempest by claiming to bear a message
for Syrian dictator Bashar Assad from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert, one stating that his country was prepared to engage in peace
talks with its longtime enemy without preconditions. That would have
marked a significant departure from six decades of Israeli practice.
Olmert did not make such a departure, which forced the Israeli
Foreign Ministry to issue a clarification that contradicted Pelosi's
supposed communique.
Pelosi also declared that the road to peace in Lebanon, which Syrian
Baathists regard as a vassal state, runs through Damascus. Farid
Ghadry, president of the Reform Party of Syria, blasted Pelosi's
carelessness, writing, "Assad is viewing her trip as a green light to
take over Lebanon the same way Saddam viewed (U.S. Ambassador to Iraq
April) Glaspie's lack of interference as a green light to invade
Kuwait."
Unlike Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, who prefaced the
dialogue with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with a harsh
rebuke of his government's repressive policies, Pelosi's photo-op
notably glossed over Assad's totalitarian tendencies and his regime's
routine violation of human rights.
This month, 92 years after the fact, Pelosi felt the time had come
for American lawmakers to finally issue a definitive statement about
the first state-sponsored mass murder of the 20th century. When the
Armenian genocide issue came up in 2000, one of its most forceful
opponents was Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif. The Fresno Bee reports that
Lantos warned against offending Turkey, telling colleagues that
"there is a long list of reasons why our NATO ally at this point
should not be humiliated."
Some of those reasons were related to U.S. enforcement of a U.N.
no-fly zone in northern Iraq: No access to U.S. bases in Turkey, no
no-fly zone.
President Bill Clinton felt that the security imperatives in Iraq
outweighed the political significance of a congressional declaration
in Washington. So he appealed to members of his own party, including
Lantos, to delay the genocide resolution and, ultimately, to
Republican House Speaker Denny Hastert to kill it.
Now that the United States has 168,000 military personnel in Iraq,
it's a different story on Capitol Hill. Lantos, as chairman of the
House Foreign Affairs Committee, dismisses Turkish sensitivity.
"The Turkish-American relationship is infinitely more valuable to
Turkey than it is to the United States," he said recently on CNN.
President Bush appealed to Congress to put the welfare of American
military personnel first. Most military air cargo headed for Iraq
passes through Turkey's Incirlik air base, including new MRAP -
mine-resistant, ambush-protected - vehicles that are finally
providing a measure of protection against deadly IED attacks. No
Incirlik, no MRAPs, or at least their delivery to the war zone will
be delayed. Contrary to Lantos' assertion, more Americans will die if
the United States loses access to bases in Turkey.
Yet, unlike her predecessor as speaker, Pelosi pushed forward with
the genocide resolution, in spite of the known consequences. Assuming
the guise of secretary of state again, she said it was part of her
mandate to reassert America's moral authority. By end of week, cooler
heads appeared to be prevailing.
Congress should go on record about the atrocities that claimed 1.5
million Armenian lives. Historical amnesia about the systematic
slaughter of Armenians has encouraged many of the genocidal movements
that followed.
But after nine decades and with a war in Iraq, now is not the time to
put U.S.-Turkish relations to a test.
Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, George Shultz, James Baker,
Lawrence Eagleburger, Warren Christopher, Madeleine Albright and
Colin Powell sent Pelosi a letter in September warning her that the
resolution would endanger U.S. national security interests. A real
secretary of state would already know that.
Jonathan Gurwitz writes for the San Antonio Express-News. His
http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20071028/N EWS/710280326/-1/COMMUNITIES