Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pargev Ohanyan: "Do Not Make Me A Hero"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pargev Ohanyan: "Do Not Make Me A Hero"

    PARGEV OHANYAN: "DO NOT MAKE ME A HERO"

    A1+
    [06:16 pm] 27 September, 2007

    "Do not make me a hero. I have just done my job", said Pargev
    Ohanyan, the judge of the First Instance Court of Kentron-Nork
    Marash Communities to his colleagues of the RA Justice Board. "I
    have never liked politics and have never been engaged in politics. I
    am not an opposition. I am the representative of the authorities",
    said Pargev Ohanyan, quoting Socrates: "Judge is the speaking law,
    law is the speaking judge. Law has a spirit, and one should not clutch
    at the letter of a law, if it contradicts the law's spirit". Ohanyan
    confessed that he had always followed the law. "Never do what you do
    not want to do". He had always followed this principle and called on
    his colleagues of the RA Justice Board to do so.

    These were the last words of the judge, before the Board made its
    decision. But before the decision Hayk Alumyan, Pargev Ohanyan's
    advocate presented two decisions to the Court that contradicted the
    observation of the Disciplinary Commission referring to the comments
    of the Article 22 of the Criminal Code. In the mentioned two decisions
    the Appeal and Cassation Courts commented on the law just as Pargev
    Ohanyan had done, whose comments the Disciplinary Commission considered
    obvious harsh violations.

    Alumanyan pointed out that they did not think that Article 22 was
    commented incorrectly, otherwise, they would have been appealed against
    it and the same article would not have been commented in the same by
    the two instances.

    The Justice Board rejected both mediations of the advocate. The
    first one referred to bringing all cases to the Court, which the
    Disciplinary Commission examined "since the observation of the
    Disciplinary Commission did not proceed from the case". The second
    one was to invite the members of Judicial Department to the Court,
    who demanded and started the action.

    Hovhannes Manukyan, member of Judicial Board confirmed that there were
    no signatures under the observation and no date was mentioned on it.

    The decision of the Board is due on 12 October.
Working...
X