No announcement yet.

Lithuania: Who recorded and posted conversations of ambassadors to A

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lithuania: Who recorded and posted conversations of ambassadors to A

    Lithuanian press:It should be disclosed who recorded and posted
    conversations of ambassadors to Azerbaijan and Hungary into Inte

    16:16 31/08/2013 » IN THE WORLD

    Ramūnas Bogdanas in the Lithuanian site writes, that there is
    one main question regarding the disclosed phone conversations of two
    Lithuanian ambassadors: who recorded them and leaked on youtube?

    According to the author focusing on the content of the conversations
    would mean swallowing the bait. `Let's begin with the location of the
    `long ears' ` leaker(s). There are two possibilities: on the inside or
    on the outside. Who on the inside would be interested enough? First of
    all, in Lithuania there are institutions monitoring the flow of
    confidential information. Secondly, the people responsible may be
    professionals or daring amateurs. What is more, these are people with
    access to recordings of diplomat conversations. The leaker must have
    been an interested person or institution. Lithuanian institutions are
    capable of finding less painful ways to replace an unsuitable
    employee,' Bogdanas writes.

    Things are slightly different with persons, he notes. Nowadays, we are
    bombarded via all possible channels that global competition is a good
    thing. It also exists in the civil service where the number of
    important posts is smaller than the number of people who want them. It
    is fact that Lithuania has (and must have) ambassadors in reserve.
    Some of them are working really hard, some ` idling through the
    corridors of the Ministry, gathering information about the countries
    that will have an ambassador rotation and plotting to take the free

    But this version, though still plausible, is less possible than the
    assumption that the leaker(s) is on the outside. First of all, the
    disclosed conversations of the ambassadors to Azerbaijan and Hungary
    have one thing in common ` both are related to Azerbaijan. Even though
    supposedly two different persons uploaded the videos on youtube ` a
    Lithuanian and a Turkmen ` both titles and visual styling are the
    same. From a philological point of view it would seem that the same
    person made the English subtitles. The conversations were uploaded on
    8 July. They become publicly known at the end of July.

    The author also says that the dissemination of the phone conversations
    of the two ambassadors are linked to Russian President Vladimir
    Putin's visit to Baku, `Russia is doing all it can to subdue
    Azerbaijan. Recently, it has destroyed Baku's plans to lay a pipeline
    on the bottom of the Caspian Sea: purportedly, the sea's status isn't
    defined and every coast country has to give its permission. It seems
    that our ambassadors were on `silovik' Sechin's to-do list to create a
    favorable atmosphere for Putin's visit. Aliyev is being set against
    Lithuania, the future Eastern Partnership's summit host. At the same
    time, a shadow is cast on the EU's diplomacy,' Bogdanas writes.
    Talking of the translator who had prepared the subtitles of the
    record, the author notes that it seems they tried to disguise as a
    translator from the West.

    The author wonders, would it not be better to take example from the
    court practices ` illegally obtained evidence is simply rejected. `I
    listened to both recordings thoroughly. And I didn't find anything
    tragic in them,' notes the journalist and adds that the ambassadors
    were talking in a slightly smug style, considering themselves knights
    on an invisible front. `I heard there were recordings much more
    scandalous than these. But that is just the way our diplomatic corps
    is. We have what we have,' he writes.

    Summing up the author says, `This entire story shows clearly that the
    security of governmental communications has to be taken care of;
    otherwise, we will be serving others as a card during high-stakes

    In its turn, as reports, Andrius Kubilius, the leader of the
    Homeland Union ` Lithuanian Christian Democrats, claims that the
    Lithuanian government's response to the scandal, in connection with
    the disclosure of the phone conversations of Arturas Zhurauskasa and
    Renatas Yushki, the ambassadors to Azerbaijan and Hungary, was to be
    more rational.

    "I have the impression that our eastern neighbors wanted to show by
    this story that they see, hear and watch over all. That is, all the
    talks, not specifically this or that ambassador's; everything is fixed
    and then at some point they do with it what is more profitable for
    that moment," the politician says.

    According to `', records of Lithuanian Ambassadors to
    Azerbaijan and Hungary were posted on YouTube in July, where, as
    stated, the two ambassadors talk to the diplomats and businessmen in
    Vilnius. On the record they informally share their personal
    observations about the Azerbaijani-Armenian relations, as well as the
    visit of Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevicius to Russia, etc.

    After the publicity of these conversations in the network Ministry of
    Foreign Affairs received the resignation petition of Arturas
    Zhurauskas, the Lithuanian Ambassador to Azerbaijan. Lithuanian
    officials called the publicity of these conversations in the network
    an Information provocation.

    Last week, Minister of Foreign Affairs Linas LinkeviÄ?ius reported that
    the leaders of the state had lost their confidence in the ambassadors
    and the latter can no longer hold the office. On Thursday, the
    President of Lithuania Dalia Gribauskaite has signed a decree
    recalling Zhurauskas and Yushki from their diplomatic mission.