Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama Marks Genocide Without Saying the Word

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama Marks Genocide Without Saying the Word

    New York Times
    April 24 2010


    Obama Marks Genocide Without Saying the Word

    By PETER BAKER
    Published: April 24, 2010

    ASHEVILLE, N.C. ' President Obama, who as a candidate vowed to use the
    term genocide to describe the Ottoman slaughter of 1.5 million
    Armenians nearly a century ago, once again declined to do so on
    Saturday as he marked the anniversary of the start of the killings.

    Trying to navigate one of the more emotionally fraught foreign policy
    challenges, Mr. Obama issued a statement from his weekend getaway here
    commemorating the victims of the mass killings but tried to avoid
    alienating Turkey, a NATO ally, which adamantly rejects the genocide
    label.

    `On this solemn day of remembrance, we pause to recall that 95 years
    ago one of the worst atrocities of the 20th century began,' Mr. Obama
    said in the statement, which largely echoed the same language he used
    on this date a year ago. `In that dark moment of history, 1.5 million
    Armenians were massacred or marched to their death in the final days
    of the Ottoman Empire.'

    When he was running for president and seeking votes from some of the
    1.5 million Armenian Americans, Mr. Obama had no qualms about using
    the term genocide and criticized the Bush administration for firing an
    ambassador who dared to say the word. As a senator, he supported
    legislation calling the killings genocide.

    `As president I will recognize the Armenian Genocide,' he said in a
    statement on Jan. 19, 2008, that used the word 10 more times. He said
    that `the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion,
    or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact.' He added,
    `An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical
    facts is an untenable policy.'

    Two years later, as president, he used none of that sort of language,
    though as he did a year ago, he hinted to Armenians that he still felt
    the same way. `I have consistently stated my own view of what occurred
    in 1915, and my view of that history has not changed,' he said. `It is
    in all of our interest to see the achievement a full, frank and just
    acknowledgment of the facts.'

    The issue has been a point of contention in Congress as well. In
    March, the House Foreign Affairs Committee voted narrowly to condemn
    the mass killings as an act of genocide, defying a last-minute plea
    from the Obama administration to forgo a vote that threatened to
    jeopardize the United States-backed efforts toward Turkish-Armenian
    reconciliation.

    Turkey, which acknowledges the killings but denies that they were a
    planned genocide, briefly recalled its ambassador from Washington in
    protest.

    On Saturday, the Armenian National Committee of America, an advocacy
    group based in Washington, condemned the `euphemisms and evasive
    terminology' and called Mr. Obama's statement `yet another disgraceful
    capitulation to Turkey's threats.'

    `Today we join with Armenians in the United States and around the
    world in voicing our sharp disappointment with the President's failure
    to properly condemn and commemorate the Armenian genocide,' said Ken
    Hachikian, the committee's chairman. He added that Mr. Obama's failure
    to following through on his campaign pledge was `allowing Turkey to
    tighten its gag-rule on American genocide policy.'

    Although the president's statement did not use the term `genocide' it
    was strong enough to provoke a sharp statement from the Turkish
    Foreign Ministry, which called the language a reflection of a
    one-sided political perception.

    The Obama statement comes as the reconciliation between Armenia and
    Turkey has become deadlocked. Armenia announced Thursday that it would
    suspend ratification of peace accords with Turkey, apparently because
    it was angered that Turkey was making new demands.

    Analysts indicated Armenia believed that Turkey was trying to put
    pressure on Armenia to reach a separate peace treaty with another
    neighbor, Azerbaijan, a close Turkish ally.


    Clifford J. Levy contributed reporting from Moscow, and Sebnem Arsu
    from Izmir, Turkey.
Working...
X