Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nagorno Karabakh: A mountainous conflict

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nagorno Karabakh: A mountainous conflict

    The Economist
    Sept 4 2014


    Nagorno Karabakh: A mountainous conflict

    A nasty war seems on the brink of flaring up again

    Sep 6th 2014 | STEPANAKERT | From the print edition


    THROUGH a slit in a stone bunker, soldiers from the Nagorno-Karabakh
    republic can see their Azeri foes just 150 metres away. In these
    mountains between two former Soviet republics, there are echoes of
    Ukraine. This summer was "more tense than before", says an officer at
    the front of this long-simmering conflict.

    Nagorno-Karabakh is run by ethnic Armenians but is legally part of
    Azerbaijan. Secession in 1988 led to a war that killed some 30,000
    people. A shaky ceasefire ensued in 1994, with Azerbaijan losing 14%
    of its territory. Exchanges of fire along the front have long been
    common, but the clashes this year have been the worst since 1994.
    Commando raids became frequent, adding to the usual sniper fire. And
    the action has spread to the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, where
    civilians have become targets. Each side blames the other. Heavy Azeri
    losses at the start of August provoked bellicose rhetoric from the
    president, Ilham Aliyev. "The war is not over," he declared. "Only the
    first stage of it is."

    Like a headmaster disciplining unruly students, Russia's Vladimir
    Putin summoned Mr Aliyev and his Armenian counterpart, Serzh Sargsyan,
    for talks in Sochi in early August. Tensions cooled, but the parties
    are no closer to a settlement. On September 2nd Mr Sargsyan
    congratulated Nagorno-Karabakh on the 23rd anniversary of its
    independence by calling the republic's choice "an irreversible reality
    now".

    But it is Ukraine that casts an ominous shadow, "reinforcing the
    zero-sum mentality", says Thomas de Waal of the Carnegie Endowment in
    Washington. Trust in international mediators and security guarantees
    has frayed. Officials in Baku, Azerbaijan's capital, detect double
    standards over sovereignty and self-determination. They wonder why the
    West punishes Russia for annexing Crimea, but not Armenia for similar
    behaviour in Karabakh. Many ask why the West approves of Ukraine using
    force to restore territorial integrity, but insists on Azerbaijan's
    peaceful patience. As a result, Azerbaijan is "losing trust in the
    ability of the West to maintain a deterrent or a peaceful ceasefire,"
    says Matthew Bryza, a former American ambassador to Azerbaijan.

    Azerbaijan feels vulnerable. Russia provides a security guarantee for
    Armenia, where it has a military base and 4,000-5,000 troops. Azeri
    officials see the Western response to Ukraine as tepid, part of a
    worrying pattern of disengagement.

    This perceived indifference has favoured a crackdown in Azerbaijan.
    Several anti-government activists have been arrested this year, some
    charged with treason. The bank accounts of NGOs have been frozen.
    International pressure was once a "brake mechanism" on Azerbaijan,
    says Sabine Freizer, at the Atlantic Council, but it may no longer
    work.

    Azerbaijan's new assertiveness has come with the weakening of two
    restraints: its military disadvantage and the prospect of a diplomatic
    settlement. Riding a wave of petrodollars, Azerbaijan's annual defence
    budget rose from $177m in 2003 to $3.4 billion in 2013. Purchases
    include sophisticated weapons from Israel, Turkey and Russia. The
    country has a new and inexperienced defence minister.

    Armenia has built up its forces and defences too. Even so, Mr Putin
    used its sense of vulnerability to persuade it to apply for membership
    of the Eurasian union, his pet project. The risk of open war remains
    low, but the militarisation of the borders and the willingness to use
    violence creates "the risk of a war by accident", says Richard
    Giragosian, director of the Yerevan-based Regional Studies Centre. The
    consequences would be disastrous, drawing in Russia, Turkey and Iran,
    and potentially feeding unrest in the Middle East.

    The framework of a peace plan exists, hinging on the return of seven
    de jure Azerbaijani districts around Nagorno-Karabakh in exchange for
    the republic's right to decide its own status. But in Stepanakert, the
    capital, leaders insist that a settlement is impossible without a seat
    at the table for Karabakh, which is represented by Armenia. Even then,
    a compromise that includes returning territory to Azerbaijan is
    "unrealistic", says Nagorno-Karabakh's prime minister, Arayik
    Harutyunyan.

    While Stepanakert seems peaceful, the people steel themselves for what
    many see as an inevitable return to violence. Zhanna Galstyan, head of
    the Nagorno-Karabakh parliament's defence committee, recalls an adage
    of Chekhov: "If there is a gun hanging on the wall in the first act,
    at some point in the play it must go off."

    http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21615631-nasty-war-seems-brink-flaring-up-again-mountainous-conflict

Working...
X