Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism,

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism,

    Middle East
    By L. Carl Brown

    >From Foreign Affairs, May/June 2006

    The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the
    Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians. Donald Bloxham. : Oxford
    University Press, 2005, 344 pp.$35.00

    The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the
    Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians

    Donald Bloxham

    Oxford University Press, 2005, 344pp., $35.00

    The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide

    Guenter Lewy

    University of Utah Press, 2005, 356pp., $24.95

    During World War I, the Ottoman decision to deport Armenians out of
    the war zone in eastern Anatolia set in motion a massacre that
    produced casualties probably numbering well over a million. As much as
    40 percent of the prewar Armenian population in Anatolia may have been
    destroyed, a destruction proportionally far greater than that of any
    other people in the terrible carnage that was World War I. Was this a
    premeditated plan to annihilate the Armenian population? Was it
    genocide? The authors of both these books give unstinting attention to
    the horrors that occurred, but they differ in their judgments about
    whether the massacres were premeditated and about the Ottoman role.

    Lewy sifts the available documentation and the charges and
    countercharges of scholars to decide that although the Ottoman
    government bears indirect responsibility for overreacting to the
    possible security threat Armenians posed and for mishandling the
    deportation, there was no plan to eliminate the Armenians; it was not
    genocide. To Bloxham, it clearly was. He offers a broad historical
    account of Armenian relations with the Ottoman Empire leading up to
    the 1915 deportation orders and the ensuing massacre. Thereafter, he
    weighs the "international response and responsibility" in this case of
    genocide in the years since. A penultimate chapter offers a
    penetrating review of official and unofficial U.S. responses from the
    time the massacres were taking place to the present.
Working...
X