Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A country on the cusp

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A country on the cusp

    A country on the cusp

    Irish Times
    Oct 02, 2004

    Turkey: Any explicator of contemporary Turkey - that mysterious,
    wildly beautiful dissolution of Europe into Asia - must contend with
    the fear and ignorance instilled in Western minds by centuries of
    conflict between Ottoman and Christian forces, writes Joseph O'Neill.

    The threatening figure of "the Turk" - a dark-browed, sensual
    Mohammedan, addicted to barbarism - lives on; and whereas the horror
    of the prison scenes in Midnight Express (1979) still lingers, the
    images of, say, Abu Ghraib (or, for that matter, the intermittent
    revelations of the shockingly primitive workings of the domestic
    criminal justice system in the US) quickly fade ina detergent flood of
    counter-narratives. Mud sticks to Turkey. Or, as the self-pitying old
    Turkish saying has it, the Turks have no friends but themselves.

    This is, of course, untrue. It is, in fact, remarkable how frequently
    foreign observers fall head over heels in love with the country and
    its people, and how much of the literature, however critical, is
    tinted with affection and even bedazzlement. From appreciative
    travellers such as Freya Stark to hard-bitten diplomats, journalists
    and academics, visitors are emotionally susceptible to Turkey's
    extraordinary charms. Andrew Mango, a BBC veteran turned Turkish
    scholar, is the latest sympathetic onlooker to put pen to paper. This
    book,which follows his acclaimed biography of Atat'rk, assesses the
    state of modern-day Turkey and the progress of its historic
    Westernising mission.

    That mission was, of course, conceived and drastically pursued by
    Kemal Atat'rk. The trajectory of the republic he founded bears, it so
    happens, many similarities to that of the Irish republic. Both shook
    off foreign rule in or around 1922; both spent their first three
    decades of independence in isolationist mode, staying neutral during
    the second World War; both have been afflictedby political violence;
    both have vexed relationships with their pasts and their national
    myths; and both now espouse a cult of entrepreneurship and economic
    growth at the expense of traditional values. So why is Turkey, by
    comparison with Ireland, still a poor, undeveloped country? What can
    be done to make things better?

    These are vital questions. Although there is, in Mango's view, little
    danger of Turkey undergoing an Islamic revolution, it is obviously
    crucial that it succeeds in establishing itself as the first
    fully-fledged Muslim democracy- which, in practice, means accession to
    the EU. The position here is well known. Even if EU economic criteria
    are satisfied, Turkey must do justice to its Kurdish citizens, end the
    widespread perpetration of physical abuse by agents of the state,
    remove its clumsy restrictions on political, cultural and religious
    expression and dispose of the need for the army to intervene
    periodically to rescue the country from the dangerous incompetence of
    its elected governments. These concerns are not the product of
    historical prejudices about "the Turk". They reflect substantial and
    legitimate concerns that increasing numbers of Turkish citizens share.

    Without hesitation, Mango puts his finger on the underlying
    difficulty: the shortage in Turkey of what, in a Kemalist turn of
    phrase, he calls "modern knowledge". (Atat'rk once peevishly asked:
    "Can a civilised nation toleratea crowd of people who let themselves
    be led by the nose by sheiks, dervishes and the like, and who entrust
    their faith and their lives to fortune-tellers, magicians,
    witch-doctors and amulet-makers?") The most profound attribute of a
    modern European nation - an inclination to rational, non-supernatural
    explanations of good and evil, and, consequently, to certain shared
    moral reflexes - characterises only an educated minority of Turkish
    citizens, the mass of whom (including many members of the political
    class) are still given to conspiracy theories, paranoia and weird
    blind spots on questions of freedom and justice. Turkey is a place
    where honour killings persist and, as Mango points out, where the
    World Trade Centre attacks may seriously be attributed to the Mossad
    and the CIA. It's also a place where the government actively
    considered the criminalisation of adultery until finally scrapping the
    proposal last week .

    Mango's attitude to such issues seems to be that, given time,
    encouragement, and understanding, Turkey will muddle its way into the
    European mainstream.He certainly does not advocate radical
    liberalisation. After all, when Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Georgia, not to
    mention prickly Greece and Armenia, nestle on your borders, when you
    have a separatist conflict on your hands, when your politicians tend
    to be self-serving demagogues and when the voting public is vulnerable
    to extremist populism, it may be that you have little choice butto
    proceed carefully and incrementally. This - conservative
    progressiveness, Mango c alls it - remains the stance of the Turkish
    army and its allies in the Kemalist establishment.

    Which brings us to an unfortunate feature of The Turks Today: it
    sometimes reads as if it were written by and for the Turkish
    authorities. Although Mango favours an informed and analytically
    critical Turkish culture, he exhibits precisely the limitations that
    continue to hold back Turkish thinking. Thus, Kurdish political
    violence is largely attributed to the "truculent" ambition of one
    individual, the PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan, and the "tradition of
    violence endemic in Kurdish society"; almost nothing is said of the
    oppression of the so-called mountain Turks and their long-standing
    claims to self-government.The Armenian genocide is subjected to a
    cursory, misleading summary that culminates with the statement:
    "Turkey holds that claims and counter-claims should be examined by
    historians and not by politicians." Never mind that historians have in
    fact examined the Armenian claims and, overwhelmingly, upheld them.

    Andrew Mango's new book is often expert; but to be of true service to
    the country he knows so well, he cannot go native on matters of
    intellectual and moral honesty.

    The Turks Today By Andrew Mango John Murray, 292pp. GBP20

    Joseph O'Neill is an author. His most recent book is Blood-Dark Track:
    A Family History (Granta Books)
Working...
X