Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yerevan Press Club Weekly Newsletter - 01/10/2008

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yerevan Press Club Weekly Newsletter - 01/10/2008

    YEREVAN PRESS CLUB WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

    JANUARY 3-10, 2008

    HIGHLIGHTS:

    "PRESS CLUB" SUPPLEMENT ON THE AIR OF "YERKIR MEDIA"

    MEDIA SELF-REGULATION DISCUSSED IN JERMUK

    ARMENIAN OFFICIALS DO NOT AGREE WITH THE ASSESSMENT OF MEDIA SITUATION AHEAD
    OF ELECTIONS

    NEW YPC PUBLICATIONS

    OSCE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCIDENTS
    WITH ARMENIAN MEDIA

    CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED VERSUS "HAIKAKAN ZHAMANAK" DAILY

    A TRIBUTE TO TIGRAN NAGHDALIAN AND GARNIK ANANIAN

    SUIT OF ARMENIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT VERSUS "SHANT" TV REFUSED

    "YERKIR" WEEKLY TEMPORARILY BECOMES A DAILY

    "ZHAMANAK-YEREVAN": A NEW EDITOR IN THE NEW YEAR


    "PRESS CLUB" SUPPLEMENT ON THE AIR OF "YERKIR MEDIA"

    On December 22 and 29, 2007 on the air of "Yerkir Media" TV company two
    first supplements to "Press Club" program cycle were aired. The supplements
    deal with the problems of media coverage of election campaign. In the
    supplements journalists and public took part. The program is produced under
    the project of Media Diversity Institute with the financial assistance of
    the US Department of State Public Affairs Section.

    MEDIA SELF-REGULATION DISCUSSED IN JERMUK

    On December 22-23, 2007 in Jermuk, Vayots Dzor region, a seminar "Ways of
    Enhancing Media Role in Armenia" was held. The event was organized by
    Yerevan Press Club with the financial support of Open Society Institute. The
    representatives of media and journalistic associations discussed the current
    projects aiming at strengthening free expression and improving
    professionalism. The presentations on the seminar were dealing with such
    issues as YPC initiatives on self-regulation institute formation in Armenia,
    the role of self-regulation at election time, the linkage between monitoring
    the election coverage in media and self-regulation projects, enhancing the
    role of media in Armenia in the context of international cooperation.

    ARMENIAN OFFICIALS DO NOT AGREE WITH THE ASSESSMENT OF MEDIA SITUATION AHEAD
    OF ELECTIONS

    On December 18, 2007 the web-site of the Armenian Service of Radio Free
    Europe/Radio Liberty published the interview of the Council of Europe
    Secretary General Terry Davis to the New York correspondent of RFE/RL. In
    the interview Terry Davis disclosed some details of his meeting with the RA
    Prime Minister Serge Sargsian, held during the visit of the Armenian
    delegation to Brussels and Strasbourg on December 9-11. During the meeting
    the upcoming presidential elections in Armenia were discussed, in
    particular, the media activities, including the positive coverage of Serge
    Sargsian and the negative - of his opponents. "Of course, I agree that any
    acting Prime Minister (...) will receive much more publicity than people who
    are not prime minister. You have to take that into account. As I was
    explaining to the Prime Minister of Armenia, it's not the number of
    references to him or to his political opponents that matters; it was the
    overwhelming analysis which showed that the comments were favorable to the
    Prime Minister and unfavorable for his opponents. And that's wrong, that's
    biased, and that's what's wrong in a democracy", Terry Davis noted. Summing
    up his impressions about the meeting with the Armenian Prime Minister, the
    CoE Secretary General made the following assessment: "I think the situation,
    as it is analyzed today with the media in Armenia, does not meet the
    standards of the Council of Europe to a large extent. There is evidence,
    done not by the Council of Europe, but by people on the ground there, in
    Yerevan. There's a very good nongovernmental organization called the Press
    Club of Yerevan - they have done the analysis and I referred to their
    analysis when I was talking to the Prime Minister."

    On December 20 the statement of the co-rapporteur of the Monitoring
    Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Georges
    Colombier on the visit to Armenia on December 3-5, 2007, was published. As
    regards the role of media, Georges Colombier noted that according to the
    Armenian law and the assurances received from the Armenian authorities,
    there should be equal coverage of the presidential candidates during the
    official electoral campaign of Armenia, that is only as of 21 January, 2008.
    However, at present, according to media monitoring conducted by the Yerevan
    Press Club, there is excessive coverage of the Prime Minister, who
    accumulates this capacity with that of presidential candidate, and very
    negative coverage of another candidate, Levon Ter-Petrosian. "I insisted
    that a more balanced access to the public television should be guaranteed
    for all 9 presidential candidates, at least as of 7 December 2007, when all
    of them officially submitted their nomination documents to the CEC", the
    statement of co-rapporteur of PACE Monitoring Committee noted.

    On his behalf, on December 19 the RA Prime Minister Serge Sargsian spoke
    about the media situation during the meeting in Yerevan with the EU Special
    Representative for the South Caucasus Peter Semneby. "When a European
    official expresses an opinion on the partial media coverage, it should be
    born in mind that this opinion is based on unobjective materials presented
    to him. If this structure or representative is interested in real situation,
    they can contract a specialized organization that would undertake a complete
    monitoring, including both electronic and print media. In that case no one
    would have any objections regarding impartiality", Serge Sargsian said,
    noting that "today it is necessary to have negotiations with a reputable
    international organization to ensure a full-scale monitoring of media
    coverage of elections with high professional quality" (quoted by the
    communication of December 19, 2007, placed on the RA Government's web-site).

    On December 26 Yerevan Press Club and "TEAM" Research Center disseminated
    the following statement.

    "During the meeting with Peter Semneby, the EU Special Representative for
    the South Caucasus, the Prime Minister of Armenia Serge Sargsian qualified
    the information about the situation in Armenian media ahead of presidential
    elections 20008 that "some European officials" take into account as not
    objective, as well as proposed that a "specialized organization" should
    undertake a "complete monitoring" that includes both broadcast and print
    media.

    Because the day before this meeting critical remarks on Armenian media with
    a reference to Yerevan Press Club were made by the Council of Europe
    Secretary General Terry Davis in his interview to Radio Liberty, we think it
    reasonable to take that the RA Prime Minister implied the reports of "TEAM"
    Research Center and Yerevan Press Club about the monitoring of 8 broadcast
    channels in October and November 2007 to be the "unobjective information".
    At least this was the interpretation that a number of media gave to the
    words of the head of the Government.

    Assessments similar to the one made by the Prime Minister were also voiced
    by some other high-ranked officials; however, it is unclear what the basis
    for their statements is. If relevant research had been undertaken, it would
    be of public value to know what their findings are and what methodology was
    used. If the accusations of our "unobjectiveness" are not substantiated by
    specific facts we urge to abstain from such categorical statements.

    With all due responsibility we announce that the doubts of our objectiveness
    are completely groundless. "TEAM" has been engaged in media research since
    1996, and Yerevan Press Club since the same time monitored the coverage of
    all national elections or took part in similar researches in partnership
    with other local and foreign organizations. The technology of these
    researches was constantly improved and is currently as valid as possible. It
    is based on the methodology, developed by the leading international
    organizations, on our many-year experience, as well as profound knowledge of
    the subject due to our permanent focus on Armenian media. What else is
    necessary to be considered a "specialized organization"?

    YPC and "TEAM" never gave any reason to be suspected of political bias.
    Being independent non-governmental organizations with mission to support the
    free expression, we repeatedly criticized the official structures of
    Armenia, but in all cases this criticism followed from principled stance,
    commitments to democratic values, but not from bias. Neither through
    activities nor through public statements did our organizations ever support
    a certain candidate or political force. Unfortunately, in modern Armenia the
    responsible professional stance is not viewed as an advantage.

    In this regard we on our behalf suggest that European structures, within
    their observation of RA presidential elections, make an assessment of the
    methodology and the findings of the monitoring implemented by "TEAM" and
    Yerevan Press Club. Our work has always been transparent, and its principles
    have invariably been explained to public at length: all reports are
    presented at press-conferences and are accompanied by a detailed description
    of the methodology of the study. Any independent expert, proposed by
    international organizations observing the elections, can step into the
    monitoring we implement and be convinced of the impartiality of our data and
    analysis.

    We also support the idea of parallel media monitoring by a specialized
    international organization, selected by the structures, invited to observe
    the elections. Similar research was undertaken at all RA elections, starting
    >From 1995, and their data never ran contrary to ours. If anything could have
    created certain technical difficulties of media monitoring this time, it is
    the rather belated - only a month before the start of the official
    pre-election promotion - invitation of the international observation
    missions by the RA National Assembly. If our authorities were truly
    interested in monitoring, it would have been reasonable to attend to the
    matter in advance, not waiting to be criticized by high-ranked international
    officials. The involvement of competent foreign partners in this work will
    allow eliminating all doubt regarding the objectiveness of this or that
    study.

    The broader the coverage of media monitoring is, the fuller the picture to
    be obtained. In this regard the suggestion of the RA Prime Minister to
    include print media in monitoring effort is quite justified. At this stage
    "TEAM" and YPC restricted the scope of media studied by 8 broadcasters for
    several reasons: firstly, due to the limited resource and the
    appropriateness of focus on those media that pay the greatest attention to
    political process in the country and have the broadest audience; secondly,
    due to the need to guarantee the high quality of research that calls for
    availability of sufficient number of competent monitors; thirdly - and most
    importantly - due to the obvious circumstance that broadcast media, using a
    public resource, the frequency, have a certain commitment to the public to
    have impartial reporting. The approach lies at the heart of international
    documents and the national legislation of Armenia.

    The appropriate principles of the Council of Europe are reflected in
    Recommendation No.R (99)15 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on
    Measures Concerning Media Coverage of Election Campaigns. "(...) Aware of
    the need to take account of the significant differences which exist between
    the print and the broadcast media", the Committee of Ministers recommends:
    "(...) Regulatory frameworks on media coverage of elections should not
    interfere with the editorial independence of newspapers or magazines or with
    their right to express any political preference (...)." At the same time,
    "(...) with due respect for the editorial independence of broadcasters,
    regulatory frameworks should also provide for the obligation to cover
    electoral campaigns in a fair, balanced and impartial manner in the overall
    programme services of broadcasters. Such an obligation should apply to both
    public service broadcasters as well as private broadcasters in their
    relevant transmission areas".

    The RA legislation, even though not fully, reflects the provisions of this
    and other recommendations of the CoE Committee of Ministers, but also
    imposes on broadcast media far greater responsibility than on print press.
    Firstly and foremostly, this refers to the public broadcaster, in the
    programs of which, according to the RA Law "On Television and Radio", "it is
    prohibited to have a predominant political stance". This prohibition is
    valid for all activities of the Public TV and Radio Company, and not only
    for the period has that preceded the elections. The specifics of broadcast
    media and importance of overseeing their compliance with laws and license
    terms are emphasized by a setup of a special regulatory body, the National
    Commission on Television and Radio, whereas our legislation stipulates no
    licensing or special regulation of print media activities.

    Hence, should monitoring of print - and hopefully also the online - media be
    undertaken, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between its results
    and the findings for broadcast media. The work of television and radio
    during elections, the level of their objectiveness are a direct
    characteristic of how compliant the state is with its political commitments
    to international partners. Apparently, this very circumstance shaped the
    opinion of the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus Peter
    Semneby about the responsibility of the authorities for the pre-election
    tone of media that caused another dissatisfied comment from the official
    Yerevan.

    In this regard we urge the RA authorities not to seek reasons of the
    criticism by international organizations in the monitoring we implement,
    which is purely a mirror, reflecting the extremely unfavorable media
    situation, but to take measures to improve it instead. Our distress with
    statements that negatively tell on the international image of Armenia is in
    no way inferior to that of the country authorities. Yet we are convinced
    that the best way of not having "one's dirty linen washed in public" is to
    keep it clean", the statement of "TEAM" Research Center and YPC said.

    "Haikakan Zhamanak" daily on December 22, 2007 informed that, in the opinion
    of the RA Central Election Commission Chairman Garegin Azarian, the report
    of the Need Assessment Mission of the OSCE/ODIHR on the visit to Armenia on
    December 4-5 and published on December 13, 2007 is partial. The newspaper
    went further to say that "the report presents the climate existing on the
    Armenian TV air, in which the TV companies keep endorsing one presidency
    candidate, Serge Sargsian", while an opposition candidate Levon
    Ter-Petrosian is constantly criticized by the same broadcasters. According
    to "Haikakan Zhamanak", Garegin Azarian answered negatively the question of
    whether the CEC Chairman is aware of the findings of the media monitoring,
    conducted by Yerevan Press Club, noting at the same time he has no desire to
    see them, either.

    On December 24 the YPC President Boris Navasardian addressed a letter to the
    Chairman of the RA CEC Garegin Azarian. "You have not refuted the report by
    'Haikakan Zhamanak' daily, so we have every ground to believe that you
    really qualify the mentioned report of OSCE/ODIHR as partial", the letter
    said in particular. Noting that the statement by OSCE/ODIHR observers about
    the bias of the TV companies was supported also by the findings of the
    monitoring, implemented by "TEAM" Research Center and Yerevan Press Club for
    two months and a half, and that the CEC Chairman has not expressed a wish to
    see the results of this study, Boris Navasardian assumed that CEC itself had
    administered monitoring and has facts at its disposal, proving the
    partiality of OSCE/ODIHR report. In this regard the letter author asked to
    explain: whether CEC or - upon its commission - any other organization has
    monitored TV air and has come up with different findings; if such study has
    been undertaken, what its methodology was, how many TV companies and how
    much airtime were studied. Besides, the letter contained a request to
    present the results of the monitoring if such has been implemented.

    As of the day the YPC Weekly Newsletter was issued, no response from CEC was
    received.

    NEW YPC PUBLICATIONS

    In late 2007 three publications were produced by Yerevan Press Club:
    "Karabagh Issue and Armenian-Turkish Relations in the Pre-Election Rhetoric
    of Armenian Political Figures", "Media and Elections", "Media
    Self-Regulation: First Steps in Armenia".

    "Karabagh Issue and Armenian-Turkish Relations in the Pre-Election Rhetoric
    of Armenian Political Figures" book analyzes the findings of monitoring on
    coverage of the Mountainous Karabagh problem and Armenian-Turkish relations
    in 7 print media of Armenia during the election campaign for the RA National
    Assembly (April-May 2007). One of the main tasks of the research was to
    determine the completeness and adequacy of the press reflection of the
    stances of parties, running for seats in the parliament, on the two
    important issues on the foreign policy agenda of Armenia. Besides, a number
    of adjacent issues were studied: the specifics of the press coverage of
    Armenian-Azerbaijani and Armenian-Turkish relations; the accuracy and
    reliability of the information published; the existence of ideas and
    proposals regarding the normalization of Armenia's relations with the
    neighbor countries in the statements of the politicians and in articles,
    etc. The book is published in Armenian, English and Russian languages
    (within one cover) with the support of Friedrich Ebert Foundation.

    "Media and Elections" book is a certain manual for journalists covering
    election campaigns. It, in particular, presents the provisions of the RA
    Constitution on freedom of expression and clauses of RA legislation on
    pre-election promotion; Recommendation R (99)15 of the Council of Europe
    Committee of Ministers of September 9, 1999, on Measures concerning Media
    Coverage of Election Campaigns and its Appendix; fragments from the final
    reports of the OSCE/ODIHR observation missions concerning the media
    activities during the Armenian parliament and presidential elections of 2003
    and parliament elections of 2007; reports of Yerevan Press Club on
    monitoring the Armenian media coverage during the election campaigns for the
    RA National Assembly and the elections of the RA President in 2003, as well
    as the report of the "TEAM" Research Center and YPC on monitoring the
    Armenian media coverage of the parliamentary elections of 2007.

    "Media Self-Regulation: First Steps in Armenia" contains materials on the
    activities of the Media Ethics Observatory since its foundation on March 10,
    2007. The brochure includes the Code of Conduct of Media Representatives and
    its appendix, the Declaration on Election and Referendum Coverage
    Principles; the list of media who signed the documents; the composition of
    the MEO and its judgments.

    Both books mentioned are published in Armenian language with the support of
    the Open Society Institute.

    All three publications will soon be placed on YPC web-site www.ypc.am

    OSCE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCIDENTS
    WITH ARMENIAN MEDIA

    On December 24, 2007 the cameraman of "GALA" TV company Grigor Shaghoyan
    challenged with the RA General Prosecutor's Office the resolution of the
    investigative department of Shirak Region of the Chief Investigative
    Department of the RA Police about the discontinuation of the investigation
    on impeding the legitimate professional activities of the journalist.

    As it has been reported, on October 22 the owner of "CHAP" LLC, founding
    company of "GALA", Vahan Khachatrian issued a statement regarding the
    attempts of various power agencies to exert pressure on the TV channel. The
    document stressed the infallibility of the TV channel's stance and the
    readiness to prevent any attempt of intervention into its editorial policy.
    One week after the statement a tax audit started at "CHAP", after which the
    RA State Tax Service reported the violations revealed. In particular, this
    referred to concealed amounts of TV advertising and illegal use of the city
    tower owned by the Gyumri municipality. The Gyumri Tax Inspection and the
    city administration filed respective suits, and the RA Commercial Court
    started hearing both suits. The process of the tax audit itself was covered
    by "GALA" TV company. On November 6 an incident occurred between the TV
    company cameraman Grigor Shaghoyan and a representative of the RA State Tax
    Service. The latter attacked the cameraman, took him by the throat and tried
    to take the camera away. On the same day Grigor Shaghoyan addressed the
    Gyumri Police Department with an appeal of his legitimate professional
    activities being impeded. On December 12 the Head of the OSCE Office in
    Yerevan, Ambassador Sergey Kapinos addressed a letter to the Head of the RA
    Police Haik Harutiunian, the Head of the Gyumri Police Department Hakob
    Ghevondian and the Governor of Shirak region Lidia Nanian, requesting to
    inform the OSCE Office whether a criminal case had been filed on the
    incident. The Ambassador also stressed the need for proper investigation
    into the matter. On December 18 Grigor Shaghoyan was notified that criminal
    proceedings will not be instituted due to absence of corpus delicti (see
    details in YPC Weekly Newsletter, December 14-20, 2007).

    On December 21 the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Miklos
    Haraszti announced he was concerned that "GALA" TV company may cease
    broadcasting as a result of pressure by authorities. "The recent cases of
    harassment and violence against independent and opposition media have
    contributed to an atmosphere of intimidation and fear in the journalistic
    community of Armenia", said the letter of Miklos Haraszti to the Armenian
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Vardan Oskanian. In his letter Miklos Haraszti
    expressed hope that "the local authorities will not make arbitrary decisions
    and demonstrate goodwill for a compromise settlement, so that 'GALA' TV can
    continue broadcasting".

    The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media also expressed his concern
    regarding the explosion at the entrance of "Chorrord Ishkhanutiun" newspaper
    that occurred in the early morning of December 13 (see YPC Weekly
    Newsletter, December 7-13, 2007). "I urge Armenia's law enforcement bodies
    to punish the perpetrators not just for the sake of justice, but also to
    give support to freedom of expression in the country", Miklos Haraszti
    stated, expressing hope that the Government of Armenia will fulfill its OSCE
    commitments to ensure safe and favorable working conditions for the media,
    so that the media can contribute to a fair election campaign.

    CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED VERSUS "HAIKAKAN ZHAMANAK" DAILY

    On December 20, 2007 the RA General Prosecutor's Office instituted criminal
    proceedings on Articles 135 ("Libel") and 136 ("Insult") of the RA Criminal
    Code versus "Haikakan Zhamanak" daily. The case investigation is assumed by
    the Police of the Center community of Yerevan. According to the RA General
    Prosecutor's Office, the criminal proceedings were instituted upon an appeal
    by the leader of the National Democratic Union Vazgen Manukian. As it has
    been reported, the statement that Vazgen Manukian released on December 19
    said that on December 15, 2007 "Haikakan Zhamanak" had published an article
    "Mein Kampf - 'My Struggle' of Vazgen Manukian". In the beginning of the
    publication the newspaper stated that its quotes fragments from a manuscript
    titled "How to Do", authored by Vazgen Manukian and discovered on September
    27, 1996 during the search at the office of the National Democratic Union.
    According to "Haikakan" Zhamanak", the manuscript narrates a series of steps
    necessary to implement for Vazgen Manukian to become the President of
    Armenia. Vazgen Manukian announced he was not the author of this manuscript
    and explained his appeal to the Prosecutor's Office by "the urgency of the
    issue as well as the cynicism, with which the newspaper attempted to insult,
    libel" him. "I would not have gone to the Prosecutor's Office, had the
    Editor of the newspaper taken my offer - to send the document for an expert
    assessment jointly with my representative", the statement of Vazgen Manukian
    stressed (see YPC Weekly Newsletter, December 14-20, 2007).

    With regard to the publication in "Haikakan Zhamanak" "Aravot" daily on
    December 27, 2007 quoted the interview of the Chief Editor of "Hayastani
    Hanrapetutiun" daily Tigran Farmanian to the Armenian Service of Radio Free
    Europe/Radio Liberty. In particular, Tigran Farmanian said that the
    fragments of manuscript, allegedly authored by Vazgen Manukian, were
    published in "02" newspaper on October 17 and 31, 1996. The newspaper was
    the print organ of the RA Ministry of Interior and at that time was headed
    by Tigran Farmanian. In the lead to the first publication, Tigran Farmanian
    noted, it was mentioned that the manuscript was found on the table of Vazgen
    Manukian during the search, however, it was not maintained that he was the
    author.

    A TRIBUTE TO TIGRAN NAGHDALIAN AND GARNIK ANANIAN

    On December 28, 2007 at Journalism Department of Yerevan State University a
    lecture room was inaugurated, named after the Chairman of the Council of the
    Public TV and Radio Company of Armenia Tigran Naghdalian, assassinated this
    day five years ago. The Tigran Naghdalian lecture room was set up with the
    assistance of Public TV and Radio Company. During the ceremony it was
    announced the PTRC has also established a special Tigran Naghdalian
    Scholarship for YSU journalism students.

    On the same day the Center of Multimedia Journalism at YSU Journalism
    Department was given the name of one of its founder, the corresponding
    member of the RA National Science Academy, Professor Garnik Ananian, the
    many-year dean of journalism school, who passed away in November 2007.

    SUIT OF ARMENIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT VERSUS "SHANT" TV REFUSED

    On January 9, 2008 the court of primary jurisdiction of Arabkir and
    Kanaker-Zeytun communities of Yerevan announced the ruling on the suit of
    Armenian National Movement (ANM) versus "Shant" TV company. As it has been
    reported, the plaintiff demanded that the TV company refute the information
    discrediting to the party that was communicated on November 30, 2007 on the
    evening "Horizon" newscast of "Shant" TV channel. The newscast reported an
    anonymous phone call to the newsroom with threats to explode the TV company
    if it aired libel on the First President of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosian once
    again. The information had also a comment from the program host: "We condemn
    any terrorist step, any threat - whether from ANM or any other political
    force." In the opinion of the plaintiff, in "Shant" communication the
    anonymous phone threat was unduly linked to ANM, which discredited the
    reputation and dignity of the party and its members. The court hearing
    started on December 13, 2007 (see details in YPC Weekly Newsletter, December
    14-20, 2007).

    At the session of January 9 the suit of ANM was refused. In the opinion of
    the court, the communication of "Shant" TV company contained no elements
    discrediting to ANM.

    "YERKIR" WEEKLY TEMPORARILY BECOMES A DAILY

    On January 8, 2008 "Yerkir" newspaper, the official organ of the Supreme
    Body of "Dashnaktsutiun" party of Armenia, started to be published five
    times a week. As YPC was told by the editorial staff of the newspaper, the
    transition from weekly publication to daily is related to the upcoming
    presidential elections, after which "Yerkir" will become a weekly again.

    "ZHAMANAK-YEREVAN": A NEW EDITOR IN THE NEW YEAR

    Starting since 2008 the executive editor of "Zhamanak-Yerevan" daily is
    Aydin Morikian, previously the head of "Hayastani Hanrapetutiun", "Orran",
    "Avangard" newspapers, "Hayatsk Yerevanits" magazine.


    When reprinting or using the information above, reference to the Yerevan
    Press Club is required.

    You are welcome to send any comment and feedback about the Newsletter to:
    [email protected]

    Subscription for the Newsletter is free. To subscribe or unsubscribe from
    this mailing list, please send a message to: [email protected]

    Editor of YPC Newsletter - Elina POGHOSBEKIAN
    _____________________________________ _______
    Yerevan Press Club
    9B, Ghazar Parpetsi str.
    0002, Yerevan, Armenia
    Tel.: (+ 374 10) 53 00 67; 53 35 41; 53 76 62
    Fax: (+374 10) 53 56 61
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Web Site: www.ypc.am

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X