Tweet
EurasiaNet, NY
Feb. 26, 2008
Armenia: Dueling Protests Occur in Yerevan, as President Calls on
Opponents to Sober-Up
By Gayane Abrahamyan: 02/26/08
Yerevan was the scene of competing rallies on February 26. A protest
mounted by supporters of opposition presidential hopeful Levon
Ter-Petrosian extended into its seventh day, while, only a kilometer
away, Serzh Sarkisian, the man declared the winner of the
controversial February 19 presidential election, mustered his
loyalists in an attempt to promote the legitimacy of the balloting
results. The visiting chief of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe could only describe the situation as
`complicated.'
Ter-Petrosian backers, claiming widespread fraud, are calling for the
annulment of the presidential official election results, which handed
Sarkisian a slim majority of the ballots cast, or just enough to
obviate a run-off against Ter-Petrosian, the second leading
vote-getter. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. The
OSCE initially characterized the conduct of the election as a step
forward for Armenia's democratization process. At the same time,
election monitors noted poor practices in several areas that could
have influenced the outcome, especially given the tiny margin by
which the run-off was avoided.
Evidently concerned that the Ter-Petrosian protest movement is
gaining traction, supporters of Sarkisian, the sitting prime minister
and putative president-elect, felt compelled to organize a
demonstration of their own. According to some reports, government
employees were required to attend. At the rally, Sarkisian sought to
play the role of conciliator, a politician who could bring the
country back together after the divisive election. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive]. `We are here to heal the wounds
that have opened on the body of our nation after the election,'
Sarkisian said. `We must overcome the trial; we must make the wounds
heal quickly.'
The role of bad cop was left to outgoing President Robert Kocharian,
who in comments broadcast on Public Television harangued
Ter-Petrosian as irresponsible, and warned that his patience with
anti-government activity was running out. `No country would tolerate
illegal rallies for more than a day. It's time everybody gets sober
and realizes no one can come to power via coercive measures,'
Kocharian stated. The president also called on people `not to become
an instrument in the hands of irresponsible politicians. It is not
your game. You won't win it, you will only lose and the country will
lose.'
Despite the presidential words of warning, the ranks of Ter-Petrosian
supporters show no signs of breaking. Indeed, pressure seems to be
mounting on both sides. On February 25, for example, the leadership
of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation issued a statement that
denounced the election irregularities. The vote was `guided by
varying degrees of abuses. The leading candidates' supporters engaged
in rampant, obvious and veiled bribery. [And] in some precincts
ballot stuffing and [the use of] brutal force were observed,' the
statement asserted.
The ARF statement stressed that it was imperative for Armenia to
avoid `post-election polarization.' Thus, the party leadership opted
to acknowledge Sarkisian to be the election winner, and wished him
`the best of luck.' At the same time, ARF members stated that they
had no desire to serve in Sarkisian's cabinet, and called for a
thorough, impartial investigation into the election abuses, as well
as the creation of an electoral system that `does not allow bribery,
the participation of non-political, semi-criminal elements and the
use of administrative resources.' Under Kocharian, the ARF was part
of the governing coalition.
There were several signs that officials are nervous about the
strength of the pro-Ter-Petrosian protests. For example, a spokesman
for the State Security Service, Karen Ter-Stepanian, accused
opposition supporters of conspiring to attempt the armed take-over of
Public Television studios, the Russian news website Gazeta.ru
reported. The conspirators supposedly wanted to broadcast a
Ter-Petrosian statement denouncing the election results.
Meanwhile, government arrests of suspected opponents are continuing.
[For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. On February 26, six
more high-profile politicians, including Suren Sureniants, a leading
member of the political council of the opposition Republic Party,
were taken into custody. Sureniants is reportedly accused of
violating legislation governing public demonstrations.
Armen Harutiunian, Armenia's ombudsman, has visited the detainees in
jail, and has been in contact with 10 opposition activists who are
conducting a hunger strike to protest the election results.
Harutiunian announced that a task force has been established to
monitor developments. `The detained have lawyers,' Harutiunian said.
`Some of [the] hunger strike[rs] suffer from various types of
illnesses, so the necessity for medical help may occur at any time.'
The OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Finnish Foreign Minister Ilka Kanerva,
visited Yerevan on February 26 for a first-hand look at the brewing
crisis. Kanerva endorsed the initial findings of the OSCE election
monitoring mission, while striving to foster `political dialogue'
that can promote `legal solutions' and end the current stand-off.
`The post-election period at the moment is quite complicated and the
post-election tensions are obvious,' he said.
What appears to be the only legal avenue still open to Ter-Petrosian
forces is an appeal to the Constitutional Court. Any legal challenge,
however, faces several obstacles. For one, the deadline for
recounting ballots has passed without the vast majority of ballots
being reexamined.
Some cases where the votes were double-checked turned up wide
discrepancies with the original results. The most infamous adjustment
occurred in ballots cast at electoral district 9/31, where the
original total of 709 votes for Sarkisian was reduced to 395.
Meanwhile, only 3 of the 120 ballots cast for the ARF candidate Vahan
Hovhannisian were properly recorded, with the others mysteriously
awarded to Sarkisian. In addition, 50 votes for third-place finisher
Artur Baghdasarian were not counted.
Not only the vote itself, but the recount has come under attack by
opposition leaders. Baghdasarian, told EurasiaNet that the recount
was being manipulated `to mislead the international community.'
At a February 26 news conference, a member of the Heritage Party
leadership and MP, Zaruhi Postanjian, characterized the recounts
collectively as a `false procedure.'
`What recount can we talk about, when representatives of candidates
were kidnapped and beaten for [whistle-blowing] against [ballot-box]
stuffing on Election Day,' Postanjian said. `Nothing can be changed
by recounting the ballots' that were cast illegally in the first
place, he added.
Baghdasarian said that he personally could not place much faith in
the Constitutional Court to deliver an impartial verdict in any
electoral dispute. `Having the unsuccessful experience of appealing
to the Constitutional Court after the parliamentary election 2007, I
don't believe we will achieve any result. Everybody knows the court
system in the Republic of Armenia is not independent,' he said.
Editor's Note: Gayane Abrahamyan is a reporter for the ArmeniaNow.com
weekly in Yerevan.
Feb. 26, 2008
Armenia: Dueling Protests Occur in Yerevan, as President Calls on
Opponents to Sober-Up
By Gayane Abrahamyan: 02/26/08
Yerevan was the scene of competing rallies on February 26. A protest
mounted by supporters of opposition presidential hopeful Levon
Ter-Petrosian extended into its seventh day, while, only a kilometer
away, Serzh Sarkisian, the man declared the winner of the
controversial February 19 presidential election, mustered his
loyalists in an attempt to promote the legitimacy of the balloting
results. The visiting chief of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe could only describe the situation as
`complicated.'
Ter-Petrosian backers, claiming widespread fraud, are calling for the
annulment of the presidential official election results, which handed
Sarkisian a slim majority of the ballots cast, or just enough to
obviate a run-off against Ter-Petrosian, the second leading
vote-getter. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. The
OSCE initially characterized the conduct of the election as a step
forward for Armenia's democratization process. At the same time,
election monitors noted poor practices in several areas that could
have influenced the outcome, especially given the tiny margin by
which the run-off was avoided.
Evidently concerned that the Ter-Petrosian protest movement is
gaining traction, supporters of Sarkisian, the sitting prime minister
and putative president-elect, felt compelled to organize a
demonstration of their own. According to some reports, government
employees were required to attend. At the rally, Sarkisian sought to
play the role of conciliator, a politician who could bring the
country back together after the divisive election. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive]. `We are here to heal the wounds
that have opened on the body of our nation after the election,'
Sarkisian said. `We must overcome the trial; we must make the wounds
heal quickly.'
The role of bad cop was left to outgoing President Robert Kocharian,
who in comments broadcast on Public Television harangued
Ter-Petrosian as irresponsible, and warned that his patience with
anti-government activity was running out. `No country would tolerate
illegal rallies for more than a day. It's time everybody gets sober
and realizes no one can come to power via coercive measures,'
Kocharian stated. The president also called on people `not to become
an instrument in the hands of irresponsible politicians. It is not
your game. You won't win it, you will only lose and the country will
lose.'
Despite the presidential words of warning, the ranks of Ter-Petrosian
supporters show no signs of breaking. Indeed, pressure seems to be
mounting on both sides. On February 25, for example, the leadership
of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation issued a statement that
denounced the election irregularities. The vote was `guided by
varying degrees of abuses. The leading candidates' supporters engaged
in rampant, obvious and veiled bribery. [And] in some precincts
ballot stuffing and [the use of] brutal force were observed,' the
statement asserted.
The ARF statement stressed that it was imperative for Armenia to
avoid `post-election polarization.' Thus, the party leadership opted
to acknowledge Sarkisian to be the election winner, and wished him
`the best of luck.' At the same time, ARF members stated that they
had no desire to serve in Sarkisian's cabinet, and called for a
thorough, impartial investigation into the election abuses, as well
as the creation of an electoral system that `does not allow bribery,
the participation of non-political, semi-criminal elements and the
use of administrative resources.' Under Kocharian, the ARF was part
of the governing coalition.
There were several signs that officials are nervous about the
strength of the pro-Ter-Petrosian protests. For example, a spokesman
for the State Security Service, Karen Ter-Stepanian, accused
opposition supporters of conspiring to attempt the armed take-over of
Public Television studios, the Russian news website Gazeta.ru
reported. The conspirators supposedly wanted to broadcast a
Ter-Petrosian statement denouncing the election results.
Meanwhile, government arrests of suspected opponents are continuing.
[For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. On February 26, six
more high-profile politicians, including Suren Sureniants, a leading
member of the political council of the opposition Republic Party,
were taken into custody. Sureniants is reportedly accused of
violating legislation governing public demonstrations.
Armen Harutiunian, Armenia's ombudsman, has visited the detainees in
jail, and has been in contact with 10 opposition activists who are
conducting a hunger strike to protest the election results.
Harutiunian announced that a task force has been established to
monitor developments. `The detained have lawyers,' Harutiunian said.
`Some of [the] hunger strike[rs] suffer from various types of
illnesses, so the necessity for medical help may occur at any time.'
The OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Finnish Foreign Minister Ilka Kanerva,
visited Yerevan on February 26 for a first-hand look at the brewing
crisis. Kanerva endorsed the initial findings of the OSCE election
monitoring mission, while striving to foster `political dialogue'
that can promote `legal solutions' and end the current stand-off.
`The post-election period at the moment is quite complicated and the
post-election tensions are obvious,' he said.
What appears to be the only legal avenue still open to Ter-Petrosian
forces is an appeal to the Constitutional Court. Any legal challenge,
however, faces several obstacles. For one, the deadline for
recounting ballots has passed without the vast majority of ballots
being reexamined.
Some cases where the votes were double-checked turned up wide
discrepancies with the original results. The most infamous adjustment
occurred in ballots cast at electoral district 9/31, where the
original total of 709 votes for Sarkisian was reduced to 395.
Meanwhile, only 3 of the 120 ballots cast for the ARF candidate Vahan
Hovhannisian were properly recorded, with the others mysteriously
awarded to Sarkisian. In addition, 50 votes for third-place finisher
Artur Baghdasarian were not counted.
Not only the vote itself, but the recount has come under attack by
opposition leaders. Baghdasarian, told EurasiaNet that the recount
was being manipulated `to mislead the international community.'
At a February 26 news conference, a member of the Heritage Party
leadership and MP, Zaruhi Postanjian, characterized the recounts
collectively as a `false procedure.'
`What recount can we talk about, when representatives of candidates
were kidnapped and beaten for [whistle-blowing] against [ballot-box]
stuffing on Election Day,' Postanjian said. `Nothing can be changed
by recounting the ballots' that were cast illegally in the first
place, he added.
Baghdasarian said that he personally could not place much faith in
the Constitutional Court to deliver an impartial verdict in any
electoral dispute. `Having the unsuccessful experience of appealing
to the Constitutional Court after the parliamentary election 2007, I
don't believe we will achieve any result. Everybody knows the court
system in the Republic of Armenia is not independent,' he said.
Editor's Note: Gayane Abrahamyan is a reporter for the ArmeniaNow.com
weekly in Yerevan.