Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secretary Rice Speaks At American-Turkish Council Luncheon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Secretary Rice Speaks At American-Turkish Council Luncheon

    SECRETARY RICE SPEAKS AT AMERICAN-TURKISH COUNCIL LUNCHEON

    US Fed News
    April 15, 2008 Tuesday 9:29 PM EST
    USA

    The U.S. Department of State issued the following transcript of
    remarks by the U.S. Secretary of State:

    Secretary Condoleezza Rice:

    Thank you very much. Thank you very much to Eli Alharal. Thank you for
    that wonderful introduction. I'd also like to thank my great friend
    and mentor, General Brent Scowcroft. I hear he was telling you stories
    about when I was younger. I hope he didn't tell you too many.

    I could tell you a few about him, too. (Laughter.) But Brent, thank
    you for your work with this great organization, but also for your
    continuing leadership and your great public service.

    I'd like to thank the Turkish Minister of State for Trade, Mr. Kursat
    Tuzmen, whom I had a chance to meet just recently. The Minister of
    Defense is here, Mr. Vecdi Gonul and also I see that the Ambassador
    to the United States from Turkey is here and the American Ambassador
    to Turkey is here. So we have a very distinguished group of people,
    all of whom are dedicated and devoted to furthering this extremely
    important relationship, a relationship that has only grown in
    importance over the recent years in the complicated environment in
    which we find ourselves in the world. It's wonderful to see so many
    other friends here from the Diplomatic Corps.

    Turkey is a vital and strategic partner of the United States, and so
    it's fitting that this year's conference theme is: "Regional Allies
    and Global Partners." I did indeed visit Turkey, first as Secretary
    of State, in my very first trip in 2005 because the centrality of
    this relationship is very clear to me and has been for a number
    of years. But a year later, my then counterpart, Foreign Minister
    Gul, now President Gul, and I decided to create a strategic vision
    statement for U.S.-Turkish relations, because we wanted to show that
    the relationship between Turkey and the United States was evolving
    and was moving toward the challenges of the 21st century. That it,
    of course, was a relationship that had important elements as military
    allies and NATO. But it was much more than that. It was a relationship
    of growing economic ties. It was a relationship of growing diplomatic
    responsibility for the challenges in the world.

    And perhaps, most importantly, it was a growing relationship between
    our peoples. I am always very much mindful that, while the relationship
    between governments is important, the relationship between peoples is
    what really brings a firm foundation to a relationship between nations.

    Now, as NATO allies over many decades, our cooperation today is closer
    and more necessary than ever - in fighting terrorism, in promoting
    freedom and democracy, and in ensuring that all people within the
    region can live safely and securely without fear. Our commitment to
    these goals also leads us beyond the region, to cooperate on a global
    basis for the advancement of peace and prosperity and freedom. The
    United States views our great democratic ally, Turkey, as an active
    shaper of positive global trends, and it is a mission that is uniting
    us more and more in the 21st century.

    It was Turkey's founder, Kemal Ataturk, who famously described the
    new Republic's vision as, "Peace at home, peace in the world." He
    recognized back then the importance of promoting peace as a key
    policy objective of the Turkish Republic - just as our own founder
    Thomas Jefferson did for the United States when he said, "Peace
    and friendship with all mankind is our wisest policy." Our mutual
    cooperation is helping to ensure a region and a world that are freer,
    more at peace, and more secure.

    Turkey and the United States in pursuing that vision share a commitment
    to a united Iraq that is secure, stable, prosperous, at peace with its
    neighbors, and free from all forms of terrorism. Let me be very clear:
    the United States recognizes the PKK as a common enemy of Turkey,
    Iraq, and the United States. Our nations, together with our European
    partners, are pursuing a comprehensive strategy to eliminate the PKK's
    safe haven in Northern Iraq and to cut off its criminal and financial
    networks in Europe. At the same time, we are working for positive
    change in Iraq to ensure the stability of Iraq through the neighbors
    process. Turkey hosted the last expanded Iraq neighbors ministerial
    in November in Istanbul. And we will meet later this month in Kuwait
    to address the challenges that we face and the progress that has been
    made in Iraq.

    Turkey and the United States are also working side-by-side in
    Afghanistan. I was just with my Turkish colleagues, including
    President Gul and Foreign Minister Babacan in Bucharest this week -
    last week with our NATO allies to reaffirm our long-term commitment to
    Afghanistan's success. Turkey has been integral to NATO's success in
    supporting the Karzai government, in limiting the Taliban's influence,
    and in providing humanitarian and reconstruction assistance for the
    Afghan people. Together we recognize that sustainable democratic
    development in Afghanistan is the key to sustainable peace.

    Turkey and the United States will continue to work together to
    defend and promote freedom and opportunity for the people of Iraq,
    Afghanistan, and Kosovo. As President Bush has said, "Freedom can be
    resisted, and freedom can be delayed, but freedom cannot be denied."

    Turkey's own long legacy of advancing modern and democratic reforms
    as a Muslim majority society can inspire those throughout the broader
    Middle East and beyond who seek to meet their own national challenges
    democratically.

    Governments that are democratic and free must also strive to ensure
    that their citizens are prosperous. Turkey and the United States have
    been promoting economic freedom, open markets, and increased trade,
    not only with each other but also with our partners around the world.

    Our dialog on these issues is very deep, it's frequent, and it's
    wide-ranging. In fact, this Thursday, as we hold our annual Economic
    Partnership Commission, this will be in full view. This meeting
    addresses the central economic issues that tie Turkey and the
    United States ever closer together in an ever more mature economic
    relationship - including investment, trade, innovation, cooperation
    in building prosperity in states that neighbor, states like Pakistan
    and Afghanistan. And of course, there is a significant portion of
    our work that is devoted to reliable energy.

    We fully understand that the growth of both our economies increasingly
    depends on new, more efficient, and more environmentally friendly
    sources of energy. Currently, Turkey occupies a strategic location
    in the region's energy supply chain. Eight percent of the world's
    oil transits Turkey each day, and its position becomes increasingly
    more important with the construction of each new pipeline on Turkish
    soil. Turkey and the United States are now building on the success
    of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, and we are developing a new
    generation of natural gas infrastructure that will help Europe secure
    its energy supplies at prices set by markets, not by monopolists. The
    Turkey-Greece-Italy and Nabucco pipelines are emerging as a new
    Southern Corridor connecting gas supplies in Azerbaijan and the
    Caspian Basin, as well as Iraq, with Turkey and other European markets.

    The United States and Turkey will from time to time disagree on how
    best to pursue our goals on all the issues I have mentioned today. It
    happens among friends. But we will also - always do so, remaining
    firmly united by our shared democratic values, like tolerance and
    respect for human dignity and human rights. Throughout history,
    both Turkey and the United States have struggled to be true to these
    values. And while we have each made many advances, many struggles
    lie ahead.

    The United States was founded on great principles, but our founding
    documents did not recognize equal rights for my ancestors or for
    women. In fact, when our Founding Fathers said "We the People,"
    they didn't actually mean me. It took the Great Emancipator, Abraham
    Lincoln, to overcome the compromise in our Constitution that made the
    founding of the United States of America possible, but that made my
    ancestors three-fifths of a man and enslaved them for another hundred
    years. Many courageous individuals fought for many years to improve
    American democracy, and to ensure that it is truly representative of
    all American citizens and that process continues even today. Thus, when
    we see the process of building and perfecting democracy in a friend
    like Turkey, we know that the road is not easy; it is, indeed, hard.

    In the 84 years since the founding of the Turkish Republic, Turkish
    citizens have continually built on Ataturk's commitment to democracy
    and secularism. As with all countries, it is a work in progress. We
    have seen Turkey strive to improve and transform its democracy and
    to modernize its economy in its bid to join the European Union. We
    continue strongly to support Turkey's EU candidacy. It will be good for
    Turkey and it will be good for Europe. Ankara's openness to renewed
    efforts on the divided island of Cyprus to reach an agreement on
    bizonal, bicommunal federation is also a key part of the process of
    Europe's construction.

    In 2007, we witnessed the maturity and vibrancy of Turkey's democracy
    as it weathered and came out stronger. It was a challenging political
    year that included a delay in the presidential election, and then the
    carrying out of both parliamentary and presidential elections. You
    may know that the struggles continue. But Turkish - the Turkish
    people, the Turkish voters, will resolve the difficulties before them
    within their secular democratic context and their secular democratic
    principles. All that can be asked of a democratic society is to stay
    true to those principles as it goes through difficult times.

    Indeed, as Winston Churchill once said, "democracy is the worst form
    of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried
    from time to time." Still, both we and Turkey know that democracy is
    the best system we have to ensure that human rights and fundamental
    freedoms are ensured for all. On that note, we commend Prime Minister
    Erdogan for stating recently that parliament will amend Article 301 of
    the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalizes insulting "Turkishness." We
    encourage this. Expressing one's beliefs is not an insult to the state;
    it is one of the highest forms of citizenship.

    Democracy is also the best way to protect peoples' right to practice
    religion freely. We appreciate the support that Turkey has given to
    the people across the broader Middle East and North Africa - impatient
    patriots in those places who are working to strengthen civil society
    and build democratic institutions as the guarantee for their freedom
    of conscience. These freedoms are essential to defeating extremism
    and terror. We have worked together, too, in the Middle East to try
    and promote a process through the Annapolis process, that would give
    the Palestinian people also an alternative to extremism and terror in
    their own state. And I want to thank the Turkish Government for the -
    its presence at Annapolis and its continuing support to that process.

    Both of our nations want to be the best champions of these values that
    we can within the region, and therefore we must continue to strengthen
    these values at home in our own democracies. We continue to encourage
    Turkey to recognize and protect civil rights of all religious and
    ethnic groups, such as by reopening the Ecumenical Patriarchate's
    Halki Seminary as a vocational school.

    The United States and Turkey will continue to support freedom,
    democracy and prosperity in the broader Middle East and well
    beyond because we know from hard experience that it is the best way
    for diverse peoples to live together, and to share power, and to
    resolve their differences in peace without oppression of anyone, or
    exclusion, or worse. These values are the foundation of everything we
    do together. And they are why I believe Lord Palmerston got it wrong
    when he said that "nations have no permanent allies." The United States
    does have permanent allies and those are nations with which we share
    values and we have, therefore, a permanent friend and ally in Turkey.

    Thank you very much. (Applause.)

    MODERATOR: Secretary Rice has graciously agreed to take some questions,
    and I'll assist. The lights are bright, so we'll do our best to see
    hands, but we've got - let's see, what have we got?

    SECRETARY RICE: I see somebody over there, yes.

    MODERATOR: ?mit, we've got a microphone right here. All right, we're
    going to go for a non-journalist first. (Laughter.) Here's one right
    here. Please.

    QUESTION: Madame Secretary, the United States had supported when the
    Annan plan vote was proceeding that it will support the ending of
    the isolation of the northern Cypriot people, the Turkish Republic of
    Northern Cyprus. As an incentive to the new momentum that is building
    up on the island, is there any opening toward that? Thank you, ma'am.

    SECRETARY RICE: Thank you. Yes, there is a new momentum building on
    the island, and we very much support efforts to use this new momentum
    to perhaps finally come to a solution. We were disappointed, frankly,
    a couple of years ago when the efforts of Kofi Annan, we thought,
    were very close to producing a result and, frankly, should have
    produced a result. And we made it known that we felt the Turkish
    Government had supported that solution, and we therefore acted to
    make some small steps to help to end the isolation of the Turkish
    Cypriots. I received, for instance, members of that government.

    It's a more hopeful period and a more hopeful sign now. But ultimately,
    some difficult choices are going to have to be made.

    People are going to have to overcome political differences and,
    really, political resistance from both sides. And so we will be
    very supportive of the UN process there. We will be active in the
    diplomacy, as we were the last time. I can tell you, for instance,
    when the referendum was up, the President personally made phone calls
    to try and carry it across. And so we're going to do everything we
    can to encourage the parties, but there is a different spirit now
    and we should build on that momentum.

    QUESTION: Thank you. Madame Secretary, thank you very much. It was
    a great speech. Perhaps you could share with us, since you were in
    Bucharest here not too long ago, since we have two great NATO allies
    here, maybe you could share with us a little bit of your sensing of how
    did the summit go and what were some of the great takeaways that came,
    particularly like in Afghanistan. Could you share that with us, please?

    SECRETARY RICE: Absolutely. It was a terrific summit. It was, in
    particular, a terrific summit because it was rather unscripted and
    people didn't read from their note cards. They actually worked at the
    summit. And it was a summit that I think will be remembered for four
    very important achievements.

    The first actually has to do with Afghanistan. The alliance issued
    a vision statement on Afghanistan that clearly commits the alliance
    for the long term in Afghanistan. And I don't mean military forces.

    Hopefully, the time will come in the relatively near future where
    Afghans can largely carry out security on their own. But we have
    to remain committed to that country because, of course, the Taliban
    is a tough enemy. It's an enemy, by the way, that isn't winning on
    the battlefield, so it's decided to do what terrorists do; it's
    decided to kill innocent people instead. And that's why you have
    the car bombs and the suicide bombs and those techniques, and the
    kidnappings. That's a sign, to my mind, that they don't want to take
    on NATO in military formations; they want to - they want instead to
    kill innocent civilians.

    And so it's a hard problem. It's a counterinsurgency strategy that
    has to be met by clearing these areas, by giving security, building
    police forces, and then reconstruction and development. And a lot
    of the discussion was about how to get a better reconstruction and
    development civilian component to the counterinsurgency. But the allies
    did talk about troops levels. We received new forces from France. The
    United States made some commitments. And I'm confident that NATO is
    going to take that mission and carry it to its successful conclusion.

    Secondly, we had very great successes on missile defense. The truth
    is that this is not, of course, missile defense as we conceived it
    in the 1980s when it was meant to be a kind of shield against the
    mutually assured destruction of facing thousands and thousands of
    Soviet warheads. Rather, this recognizes that the region, including,
    by the way, the region in which Turkey lives, faces the emerging threat
    of small missile threats from the region, and that countries ought to
    be able to defend themselves. And so NATO has agreed on a program of
    cooperation on missile defense, and we then went on to Sochi to talk to
    the Russians, where I think there was general agreement that we, with
    Europe and Russia, should pursue the possibilities of missile defense.

    Third, I think it will be remembered as a summit where new members
    were admitted: Albania and Croatia. I know that the enlargement of
    NATO is controversial in some quarters, but I can tell you that when
    I sit in this alliance where now, 12 of the 26 members are former
    captive nations, it is an alliance that is reborn by the fact that
    it has members who have recent experience with tyranny. They are the
    people who remind us what NATO really was about, which was an umbrella
    for security among democracies.

    And when you sit with Poles and Czechs and Hungarians and Latvians and
    other Balts, you know what NATO is and why it has been so important
    to peace and security in the world. And so, the admission of Albania
    and Croatia was great. It was unfortunate that Macedonia could not
    be admitted. And as soon as that name issue is resolved, it will be
    admitted, and that came through very closely - very clearly.

    Finally, it was - it was a summit that I think will be remembered for
    having said that NATO's lines will not stop at Ukraine, that in fact,
    Ukraine and Georgia should eventually have membership in NATO when
    they meet the criteria. And while there was lots of reporting about
    the membership action plan, this or that, I would just point people
    to one of the first sentences of that statement, which literally said
    that they will be members of NATO. And that's an important signal,
    because there is a struggle, still, in much of this part of the world
    for whether or not these are going to be countries that are going to
    be immersed in transatlantic values and transatlantic institutions.

    And this was a strong signal.

    Turkey was a good partner in all of those. I, myself, believe that
    the European construction, which has been really very rapidly moving
    along in the last few years since the end of the Cold War, will not
    really be complete until Turkey is in the European Union. But this
    was another opportunity to show that transatlantic institutions have
    tremendous power to transform nations and peoples in accordance with
    the values that won the Cold War.

    MODERATOR: The Secretary knows that the hand waving frantically in
    the background is a Turkish journalist and she says that's fine.

    (Laughter.) ?mit?

    QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. One thing, there is a legal
    closure case against Turkey's ruling party. What's your take on that?

    Thank you.

    SECRETARY RICE: Yes. We are following very closely this case,
    of course, and it is a matter, obviously, for Turks to decide. We
    believe and hope that this will be decided within Turkey's secular
    democratic context and by its secular democratic principles. But
    I think it is in everybody's interest that it be done in this way,
    that the voters will be heard. Turkey has democratic institutions,
    and it is our great hope that it will be resolved in that context.

    MODERATOR: One more question. I saw another hand back here a minute
    ago. Right here. Cengiz.

    QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. As a dual citizen of Turkey
    and U.S., I'm going to ask a tough question if you'll allow me. When
    the Soviet Union was dissolved, then-Secretary of State Baker sent
    a letter to each republic as a precondition of democratic relation
    - diplomatic relations. There were four conditions, one of which
    was no change in prevailing borders with use of arms. Subsequently,
    20 percent of Azerbaijan was occupied by Armenia. And United States
    initiated sanctions against Azerbaijan. And 20 percent of Azerbaijan
    continues to be occupied at the moment. How are we going to solve that
    problem for the benefit of all the people, including the Armenians?

    SECRETARY RICE: Yes. Well, I am very much of the view that the
    Nagorno-Karabakh issue is one that could be resolved, and actually,
    with just a little bit of will, could be resolved relatively quickly.

    We have been close several times within the Minsk process, where
    we have the cooperation of several countries including Russia, the
    European Union, the United States. It is just going to take taking
    a couple of difficult decisions and getting an agreement between
    Azerbaijan and Armenia on Nagorno-Karabakh.

    It needs to be done. I have made the case to both the Armenian
    Government and to the Azeri Government that they are falling behind
    the rest of the region because they will not resolve this conflict
    between them. And frankly, there is plenty of, if you wish to use
    the word blame, to go around on both sides. This could be done if
    there's political will and it ought to - it ought to be done.

    MODERATOR: Thank you very much, Madame Secretary. Please remain at
    your seats. The Secretary will say hello to our head table and we want
    to thank her very much for a wonderful speech and for being with us
    this afternoon.

    SECRETARY RICE: Thanks, Jim. Thank you. (Applause.)
Working...
X