Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Proposals Of Pace Resolution Must Be Addressed To Everyone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Proposals Of Pace Resolution Must Be Addressed To Everyone

    THE PROPOSALS OF PACE RESOLUTION MUST BE ADDRESSED TO EVERYONE
    Arthur Hovhannisyan

    Hayots Ashkhar Daily
    une 27, 2008
    Armenia

    Interview with RPA deputy chairman, MP Razmik Zohrabyan regarding PACE last
    resolution.

    "The PACE resolution regarding Armenia particularly states that
    from now on the authorities must not put improper restrictions on
    the demonstrations organized by the opposition. It seems PACE is not
    satisfied with the amendments and supplementations made in the law on
    "Holding rallies, demonstrations and protest marches" What would you
    say in this respect?"

    "As we know the law on making amendments and supplementations in that
    law has already been passed by the National Assembly and has already
    come into force. As regards the requirements made by the opposition,
    to hold demonstrations wherever and whenever they want, then I must
    say that it is up to the authorities to decide. The Municipality
    has the right to propose a proper place for holding demonstrations,
    based on the security of the citizens. And it cannot be considered
    an improper restriction."

    "The Parliamentary Assembly considers intolerable to conduct criminal
    persecutions based only on the testimony of the police. Is it a
    legally acceptable proposal to ignore the testimony of the police,
    in case of the absence of other testimonies?"

    "From the legal point of view it is an unacceptable proposal and
    doesn't meet the requirements of RA Criminal Code, and by the way
    not only RA. Besides that it is up to the court to consider the
    testimonies trustworthy or false. The demands and the proposals must
    be close to reality."

    "The resolution also proposes the President to appeal to the National
    Assembly with the law on "Amnesty", which will provide an opportunity
    to release those detained in connection with March 1-2 developments,
    who didn't commit violent actions. Which means only physical violence
    is considered a crime, do you think only physical violence is dangerous
    for the people?"

    "Of course no. The criminal code envisages punishment not only for
    conducting physical crime, but also for instigating, organizing,
    and assisting violence, murder, firings and other types of crimes.

    For example if it comes clear due to the investigation that the
    organizer or organizers made attempts to take power by force or
    breached the constitutional order of the Republic of Armenia, then
    they will face charges according to article 300 of RA Criminal Code,
    even if they failed to bring their violence to the end.

    In my personal opinion the actions of Levon Ter-Petrosyan's supporters
    were mainly aimed at taking power by force and breaching the country's
    constitutional order. But they failed because the authorities did
    their best to avert dangerous consequences."

    "The new resolution attaches great importance to the activity of the
    temporary committee investigating March 1-2 developments, especially
    to the independence and transparency of the committee's activity,
    as well as raising public trust."

    "Firstly I would like to mention that the before mentioned committee
    is a parliamentary committee and it hasn't got investigative
    functions. The readiness of the authorities to include experts in
    the works of this committee is the very step aimed at raising public
    trust towards the committee.

    As regards the proposal made by PACE, it should be addressed both
    to the authorities and the opposition. They should particularly take
    into account the fact that by refusing to have their representative
    in the committee, one wing of the opposition, "Heritage" party,
    to be more precise their faction represented in the Parliament,
    doesn't contribute to raising public trust towards the committee.

    This step of the opposition displays that no matter how transparent
    the work of the committee is going to be, opposition will anyway
    criticize it. PACE must have exhorted them to participate in the works
    of the committee by their own representative and contribute to the
    fair investigation. However I believe the authorities simply have to
    form a really independent body, to investigate what has happened and
    represent its standpoint.
Working...
X