Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crucial Directions In Armenia-Diaspora Relations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crucial Directions In Armenia-Diaspora Relations

    Crucial Directions In Armenia-Diaspora Relations
    By Prof. Onnig Beylerian

    http://www.keghart.com/op90.htm
    31 July 2008
    Ottawa

    I should like to thank everyone who took time to reflect on the
    subjects I raised in my PowerPoint presentation, which was not the
    best tool to express the nuances of one's own thoughts. It is also
    encouraging to see that Armenia-Diasporan relations do generate
    passionate arguments and debate.

    That is yet another indication there is a great future for Armenia
    and its Diaspora.

    To put things in their context, I was asked by Dr. Dikran Abrahamian
    to present findings based on my own observations of Armenia-Diaspora
    relations, as they relate with policy development. My views did not
    in any way reflect those institutions I could be or am associated
    with. They are truly my own contributions as a distant and admittedly
    non-influential member of Canada's Armenian community.

    In this response, I can only be brief and respond to what I think
    are the most important issues raised by those who have been gentle
    enough to consider and comment my findings and observations.

    1. Undoubtedly the Diaspora is already involved in Armenia. To
    say the Diaspora should not interfere in Armenia's affairs is not to
    recognize reality. The main question is how the Diaspora's involvement
    can be more effective. Seeking remittances and cash disbursements
    or relying on the go odwill of individual Diasporans is insufficient
    and misplaced in many ways.

    Money is not everything; the real wealth of the Diaspora resides is
    in its knowhow, cumulative experience and global networks, which are
    not noticeable if one goes to a typical Armenian church on a Sunday
    morning. These are the ingredients Armenia is after and which it wants
    to tap. The problem is that this is a treasure chest that can only
    be opened through a set of policies that provides Diasporans with
    concrete incentives to participate in Armenia's development. Without
    these incentives, I don't see how the Diaspora will develop its
    present engagement to higher levels. Hence my suggestion that Armenia
    should provide the Diaspora with means to participate effectively
    in the Armenian political process and institution building, and not
    necessarily in the decision-making process; even though Armenia's
    foreign policy was and still is led by personalities largely supported
    and well-regarded by the Diaspora. By participating in the political
    process, I mean Diasporan representatives sitting in the Parliament
    in some capacity, or competent Diasporans sitting on government
    consultative bodies, such as commissions to fight corruption or setting
    up a professional and non partisan public service. The Diaspora
    could also be entrusted to set up an independent body to monitor
    and report the validity of results of future elections. There are
    many other20useful tasks the Diaspora could do if it was seriously
    asked as a means to effectively contribute to Armenia's political
    and economic development. The Diaspora may not have the experience at
    first to undertake these tasks, but lack of experience is no excuse
    for not trying to do the best it can.

    2. Does the Diaspora possess the capacity to do all of the latter? To
    answer this question one needs to make a distinction between community
    organizations situated at the level of host countries and full-fledged
    Diasporan organizations that represent several community organizations
    at once. Forcibly, such organizations would span across several
    host countries, such as the United States and Canada. Today, while
    there is appreciable traffic between Armenians living in different
    countries who collaborate on multiple projects and issues, there are
    no permanent consultative or coordinating bodies whose mission is to
    address the interests and needs of Armenian communities throughout
    the world. Conventional wisdom amongst Armenians is to keep their
    business low-key as there are obvious advantages to get the job done
    in the traditional and time-tested Armenian way. But there are also
    disadvantages in that it does not contribute to institution-building
    and it leaves a lot of Armenians out of the loop.

    Therefore it is not surprising that the Diaspora is not ready to play
    any useful role at this moment, because it has no institutional and
    organizational transnational existence and because the opportunity to
    create that context was simply never attempted, despite the goodwill
    of influential Diasporans very keen in creating their self-styled
    personal Congresses. One would have wished that the initiative to
    build the Diaspora's transnational institutions came from its own
    ranks. But unfortunately that did not happen thus far. So Armenia
    stepped in since it does face immediate and serious challenges even
    more so that it can use state means to establish some process to have
    access to the Diaspora's resources.

    So far Armenia organized three conferences and despite the huge
    enthusiasm generated by those venues, no permanent bodies came out
    if it. Everybody returned home to continue their daily Diasporan
    chores and we're still wondering as to what really happened. The
    last conference looked like an academic symposium instead of being
    a true Assembly of Armenians (or more aptly Hayotz Hamazhoghov --
    I'm sure Viken will correct my Western Armenian); which should be
    the equivalent of the General Estates where a nation takes stock of
    the issues it faces but also of its strength .

    It's like drawing up an inventory of one's capabilities and
    ultimately power so as to address major challenges. If at the
    fourth Armenia-Diaspora conference there is clear political will
    to conduct the proceedings in that way and with the clear intent of
    establishing permanent bodies to develop and implement major policies
    and programmes, then a huge step will be taken in the right direction
    as many capable and skilful Diasporans will in time step forward.

    It should remain a hope that the Dialogue Committee set up by Armenia's
    Foreign Affairs will broach this issue and eventually adopt practical
    measures to reach out to many Diasporans.

    3. Some have argued that the Diaspora is in such a sorry state when it
    comes to its own internal political processes that it would be arrogant
    on the Diaspora's part to claim that it can "interfere" at will in
    Armenia' internal affairs. First, I do not share the dire conclusions
    of the institutional state of Armenian communities. On the contrary
    it is hard not to fully recognize those who did contribute to the
    building of schools and churches to protect and nurture small islands
    of Armenia in distant lands. It is also hard to dismiss either all
    those who selflessly contributed to the genocide recognition campaigns
    or those who responded to the calls of Armenians in distress in 1988,
    1991 and onwards, such as Charles Aznavour who had forgotten his roots
    until the earthquakes shook him up to his core. Many of the Diaspora's
    efforts are those of unsung heroes of Armenian communities across the
    globe and whose histories have yet to be written. In short, let u s
    not short change the enormous achievements of individual communities.

    However the institutional weaknesses of community organizations --and
    there are many--we need to hang on to them at all costs. The only sure
    way that Armenian life in the Diaspora can flourish is to modernize
    these community organizations and to welcome back all those who have
    left it for good or those who among the younger generation do not
    see any interest in being part of it. I do not have readymade answers
    as to how that feat can be realized. But I do know that exceptional
    young Diasporans did not wait for that modernization to happen and
    therefore moved to discover the deepest dimensions of Armenia and hence
    of themselves. In this discovery, the hub is in Armenia but also in
    individual communities where there is need for more transparency and
    inclusiveness. Without really noticing, a new global Armenian identity
    is emerging where it will be difficult to draw a clear line between
    the Diaspora and Armenia. The contours of that identity remain quite
    hazy, but one way to find that out is to draw together individual
    communities spread across the globe in workable forums. I believe
    that mustering the Diaspora's power in its own organizations or
    institutions with the full support of Armenia as its base represents
    one way of initiating and promoting this modernization.

    However, we have to be realists and correctly e valuate the stage
    at which the Diaspora and Armenia are so as to move from that point
    onwards, slowly but surely. In many ways both are at same level
    of political development. Therefore they are called upon to work
    in tandem as the Diaspora will never disappear: it has proven it
    can survive and regroup even after the worst disaster. Nor will it
    dissolve in some big repatriation scheme.

    Armenia has the ingredients to help the Diaspora to get its act
    together and the Diaspora has the ingredients to help Armenia even more
    effectively, provided that the Diaspora is given the opportunity to
    do so. Both sides have everything to gain if they can only identify
    what is to be done. This entails that they accept to work hard in
    making this happen. It's not an easy task and it will take several
    generations.

    I hope I answered to some of the questions which were raised.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X