Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: This is no Armenia, you giaour!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: This is no Armenia, you giaour!

    Turkish Daily News
    Sept 6 2008

    This is no Armenia, you giaour!
    Saturday, September 6, 2008

    Yusuf KANLI

    A lawyer, in the heart of Ankara in the morning hours of the day,
    tried to warn a dolmuÅ? driver to stop dangerous driving. The
    dolmuÅ? driver stopped his taxi. Get off. With a knife in his
    hand, engaged in a heated verbal fight with the lawyer. How dare the
    lawyer advise him about good manners! He noticed that the lawyer was
    smoking a cigarette. It was 10:30 in the morning. The holy month of
    Ramadan, the month of fasting, started several days ago. `This is no
    Armenia, you giaour!' shouted the dolmuÅ? driver as ` thank God
    he managed to control his outburst to that extent ` he started to beat
    the lawyer with the handle of the knife ¦ It was of course an
    isolated and definitely an individual case that should not be
    generalized to the entirety of the pious Muslim people of Turkey.

    The lawyer, Erdal Güzel was shocked ¦ He just wanted to
    warn the dolmuÅ? driver that he must stop changing lanes
    dangerously and virtually violating all traffic rules as if he was the
    lord of roads¦ But, after making a dangerous abrupt stop in front
    of the lawyer's car -- so abrupt that the lawyer hardly managed not to
    hit the back of the dolmuÅ? -- the dolmush driver got oit of his
    taxi and seeing that the `other driver' who challenged his `reign on
    the roads' was smoking a cigarette on a Ramadan day `in violation' of
    the sunrise to sunset fasting practice of the practicing Muslims, he
    shouted `This is no Armenia, you giaour!' and beat him up.

    The lawyer could not understand what had happened. He was thinking
    that he was living in a secular democracy where there were no
    `religious police' beating up people disobeying rules of religion in
    the streets with their sticks and where people could decide themselves
    what to do and what not to do within the limits of civil laws. And, as
    a lawyer, he of course believed that he was living in a country where
    the use of the word `giaour', a degrading and insulting reference to
    non-Muslims, was banned and classified as a serious offense back in
    1856 with the Reform Degree.

    Flurry of isolated cases:

    What lawyer Güzel lived through was of course an individual
    and isolated case¦ The municipal police beating up shop owner in
    the Keçiören district of Ankara two weeks ago on grounds
    that he did not close down his grocery shop -- where he was selling
    alcoholic products as well -- as he was ordered to, at 23:00
    hours. That grocery was one of the remaining few shops in that area
    selling alcoholic products. The grocer, who because of the trauma he
    was subjected to has since than has been suffering from a speech
    disorder, must have, of course, taken into consideration that the
    prime minister's house was several hundred meters away and the
    municipal police would undertake everything possible to make the prime
    minister happy¦ What happened to the grocer, was of course, not an
    act of `peer pressure' but just an `isolated incident, which should
    not be generalized¦'

    In Istanbul, a group of boys in their 20s were sipping beer and
    exchanging jokes on a summer night as they walk through one of the old
    bridges of the city. Municipal police intervened `to save the honor
    and pride of the neighborhood.'

    The young boys did not give up ¦ They refused to stop as they
    believed they had not committed any crime. Nearby shop owners and some
    citizens who just happened to be around, tried to soothe the tension
    between the boys and the municipal police. They were all beaten up,
    while shops were devastated ¦ Of course, that was as well an
    individual case, which should not be generalized.

    A nice fish restaurant overlooking the Maiden Tower ¦ It is a
    facility owned by municipality and which until recently was run by a
    private company. Now, Istanbul municipality has taken it over, is
    renovating it and soon will open it back into service as a `municipal
    fish restaurant open to public.' But, are other restaurants not open
    to public? Why there was need to say it would be a `municipal fish
    restaurant open to public'? That was the catch phrase ¦ If it is
    `open to public' that means at that facility alcohol will not be
    served ¦ While the government is engaged in privatizing whatever
    the state has, municipalities administered by the representatives of
    political Islam are `nationalizing' restaurants and converting them
    into places `open to public.' And, of course, there is nothing in
    generalizing such practices ¦ Individual cases, that's all.

    Anyhow, let's hope the trip of President Abdullah Gül to
    `Giaour Armenia' today will serve something good; further than the two
    presidents watching a soccer game together.
Working...
X