Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Iran Called On To Join New Format On South Caucasus. Tehran Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Iran Called On To Join New Format On South Caucasus. Tehran Ad

    IRAN CALLED ON TO JOIN NEW FORMAT ON SOUTH CAUCASUS. TEHRAN ADOPTS WAIT-AND-SEE POSITION
    by E. Valiyev

    Zerkalo
    Sept 10 2008
    Azerbaijan

    Five-way cooperation

    The galvanization of Turkey's and Russia's policy in the South
    Caucasus has heralded the beginning of a new stage in the struggle
    for high stakes in the "great game" for geopolitical influence in the
    region. A new negotiating format with the participation of Russia,
    Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia is gradually becoming highlighted
    within the framework of the Platform of Stability and Security
    in the Caucasus proposed by Ankara. However, the format of this
    platform, despite the lack of prospects in this regard, might expand
    in the near future for a number of reasons: it could be extended to
    five-way cooperation by including Iran. Thus, in the opinion of Armen
    Rustamyan, representative of the supreme body of the Armenian ARFD
    [Armenian Revolutionary Federation - Dashnaktsutyun] and chairman of
    the permanent parliamentary assembly for foreign relations, Teheran's
    involvement in the settlement of the conflicts in the South Caucasus
    could partially mitigate tensions in relations between Russia and
    Iran which appeared as a result of Moscow's inconsistent position
    vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear programme.

    Given the intensifying confrontation with the countries of the West,
    Russia cannot afford losing an ally as important as Iran.

    [Passage omitted on Armenia's strong interest in involving Iran]

    Currently, there is a number of disagreements between Armenia and
    Russia which prevent Yerevan from fully "trusting" the Kremlin in the
    issue of regional security. The Russian leadership keeps a distance
    from and shows virtually no interest in the processes unfolding on
    the territory of Armenia which could lead to the loss of influence in
    this region in the long run. In turn, the Armenian leadership, unsure
    if it could pin hopes on Russia's support should the events unfold in
    such a manner, is compelled to conduct a two-way policy, manoeuvring
    and trying to maintain friendly relations with the representatives of
    Russia and Turkey respectively. Russia's indistinct position in the
    South Caucasus and the likelihood that it does not have a strategy
    of bilateral relations with Armenia create a considerable risk of a
    political crisis taking shape in the future.

    According to experts, however, Iran is not an influential enough player
    in the Caucasus and the peace process in the region is unlikely to
    "blow up" without its participation. "Tehran's foreign policy is based
    on the Caucasus being the zone of the Russian Federation's interests,
    this is why it does not lay claims on any critical influence here. Its
    activeness in the region was and will be minimal," Racab Safarov,
    director of the Centre of Modern Iranian Studies, told RBK daily.

    Of course, Iran's inclusion in the five-way format of the Platform of
    Stability and Security in the Caucasus could partially tone down the
    tensions in relations between Moscow and Tehran which appeared after
    the UN Security Council passed three anti-Iranian resolution on this
    country's nuclear programme with Russia's approval. Now Russia has
    a chance of rectifying everything by starting from a demonstration
    of its interest in settling problems in the Caucasus that are vital
    for it with Iran's participation.

    Russian-Iranian relations

    It is worth reminding that the contours of the Russian policy vis-a-vis
    Iran started to become clearly highlighted at the most recent session
    of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO]. President Ahmadinezhad
    failed to convince Moscow and its partners to provide guarantees
    of security to Iran or to receive Russia's support in switching the
    trade in oil from dollars to euros. Russia once again called on Iran
    to show flexibility and engage in reserved negotiations on the issue
    of its nuclear programme. Nevertheless, Moscow also expressed support
    to Iran's actions directed at the development of the nuclear energy
    for civilian use.

    On the other hand, Safarov believes that further pressure on the part
    of NATO and the West will inevitably push Russia towards Iran. In
    the expert's opinion, a military-political alliance of Russia and
    Iran is one of the most effective ways of delivering a blow to the
    interests of the West and making it adjust its aggressive policy
    vis-a-vis Moscow and Tehran.

    The Russian-Iranian alliance will become a powerful player in
    the conditions of rapid changes of the balance of powers in
    the international arena which were prompted by the war in South
    Ossetia. The expansion of military-technical cooperation between
    the two countries could lead to the stationing of Russian military
    bases on Iranian territory. In Safarov's opinion, East Azarbayjan
    [province] and Qeshm Island [in Hormuzgan Province] in the Persian Gulf
    are the most promising centres of the Russian Federation's military
    presence here. "A base in East Azarbayjan would allow Russia to take
    control over the situation in the Republic of Azerbaijan, Georgia and
    Turkey while its presence in the Persian Gulf would give Moscow an
    unprecedented opportunity to control the actions of the United States
    and NATO in the zone of the Persian Gulf, Iraq and other Arab states,"
    the expert said.

    The struggle for control over energy carriers of the South Caucasus and
    Central Asia is becoming fiercer. Since the energy route from Central
    Asia to Europe, due to a number of reasons, can only go through the
    South Caucasus, those who control the Caucasian energy corridor can
    count on the successful completion of [the project of] the Central
    Asian gas transportation to the West in the future. Therefore, military
    and political domination in the South Caucasus will play a decisive
    role in the determination of the conflicting sides' energy policy.

    >From this viewpoint and given that Iran remains a zone of potential
    risk in the medium term, the participation of this country in
    any security system carries a risk first and foremost for the
    countries-participants in this system.

    Dividends from conflict

    On the other hand, the Iranian leadership has not yet shown
    any interest in participating in the platform and has assumed a
    wait-and-see position. Iran has already received certain dividends
    from the conflict in the South Caucasus. First, it is very likely
    that the positions of the SCO and Iran will be further harmonized,
    which will allow Tehran establish special, possibly military relations
    with this organization.

    Second, the prospects of crafting a military-strategic alliance
    directly with Russia are already in place for Iran. Third, Iran now
    has greater chances of exporting Iranian energy carriers to Europe
    and Tehran is already taking steps to develop alternative routes for
    their delivery.

    And finally, the military-political situation in the South Caucasus
    without any platform will adjust Russian-Iranian relations in terms of
    the elaboration of a common position vis-a-vis the region. Every time
    the political situation in the region changes, it delivers a blow on
    the existing route of oil transportation from Azerbaijan to Europe,
    which will help Iran become established as an alternative supplier
    of energy resources.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X